Multiattribute utility function for a comprehensive health status classification system - Health Utilities Index Mark 2

被引:691
作者
Torrance, GW
Feeny, DH
Furlong, WJ
Barr, RD
Zhang, YM
Wang, QN
机构
[1] MCMASTER UNIV,DEPT CLIN EPIDEMIOL & BIOSTAT,HAMILTON,ON L8S 4L8,CANADA
[2] MCMASTER UNIV,SCH BUSINESS MANAGEMENT SCI SYST,HAMILTON,ON L8S 4L8,CANADA
[3] MCMASTER UNIV,DEPT ECON,HAMILTON,ON L8S 4L8,CANADA
[4] MCMASTER UNIV,DEPT PEDIAT,HAMILTON,ON L8S 4L8,CANADA
[5] MCMASTER UNIV,DEPT PATHOL,HAMILTON,ON L8S 4L8,CANADA
[6] MCMASTER UNIV,DEPT MED,HAMILTON,ON L8S 4L8,CANADA
[7] NANYANG TECHNOL UNIV,SINGAPORE 2263,SINGAPORE
关键词
D O I
10.1097/00005650-199607000-00004
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
The Health Utilities Index Mark 2 (HUI:2) is a generic multiattribute, preference-based system for assessing health-related quality of life. Health Utilities Index Mark 2 consists of two components: a seven-attribute health status classification system and a scoring formula. The seven attributes are sensation, mobility, emotion, cognition, self-care, pain, and fertility. A random sample of general population parents were interviewed to determine cardinal preferences for the health states in the system. The health states were defined as lasting for a 60-year lifetime, starting at age 10. Values were measured using visual analogue scaling. Utilities were measured using a standard gamble technique. A scoring formula is provided, based on a multiplicative multiattribute utility function from the responses of 194 subjects. The utility scores are death-anchored (death = 0.0) and form an interval scale. Health Utilities Index Mark 2 and its utility scores can be useful to other researchers in a wide variety of settings who wish to document health status and assign preference scores.
引用
收藏
页码:702 / 722
页数:21
相关论文
共 55 条
[1]  
BANTA DH, 1981, CONSIDERATIONS HLTH
[2]  
BARR RD, 1993, AM J PEDIAT HEMATOL, V15, P284
[3]  
BARR RD, 1995, INT J PEDIAT HEM ONC, V2, P305
[4]  
BARR RD, 1994, INT J ONCOL, V4, P639
[5]   PERSPECTIVES ON UTILITY-THEORY [J].
BELL, DE ;
FARQUHAR, PH .
OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 1986, 34 (01) :179-183
[6]  
BERTHELOT JM, 1933, CALCULATIONS HLTH EX, V226, P161
[7]   ECONOMIC-EVALUATION OF NEONATAL INTENSIVE-CARE OF VERY-LOW-BIRTH-WEIGHT INFANTS [J].
BOYLE, MH ;
TORRANCE, GW ;
SINCLAIR, JC ;
HORWOOD, SP .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1983, 308 (22) :1330-1337
[8]  
CADMAN D, 1986, DEV HLTH STATUS INDE
[9]  
*CAN COORD OFF HLT, 1994, GUID EC EV PHARM
[10]   QUALITY-OF-LIFE ASSESSMENT - CAN WE KEEP IT SIMPLE [J].
COX, DR ;
FITZPATRICK, R ;
FLETCHER, AE ;
GORE, SM ;
SPIEGELHALTER, DJ ;
JONES, DR .
JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES A-STATISTICS IN SOCIETY, 1992, 155 :353-393