Diabetes Management According to Health Status in Older Adults with Type 2 Diabetes Staying in Geriatric Care Facilities

被引:1
作者
Libiseller, Angela [1 ]
Lichtenegger, Katharina M. [1 ]
de Campo, Antonella [2 ]
Wiesinger, Tatjana [2 ]
Cuder, Gerald [1 ]
Donsa, Klaus [3 ]
Hoell, Bernhard [3 ]
Beck, Peter [3 ]
Plank, Johannes [1 ]
Schippinger, Walter [2 ]
Pieber, Thomas R. [3 ]
机构
[1] Med Univ Graz, Div Endocrinol & Diabetol, Auenbruggerpl 15, A-8036 Graz, Austria
[2] Geriatr Hlth Ctr City Graz, Steiermark, Austria
[3] JOANNEUM Res Forsch Gesell MbH, Graz, Austria
关键词
algorithm; clinical decision support; diabetes therapy; digitalization; elderly; quality of care; NURSING-HOME; POSITION STATEMENT; WORKING PARTY; PEOPLE EDWPOP; MELLITUS; HYPERGLYCEMIA; HYPOGLYCEMIA; ASSOCIATION; UPDATE;
D O I
10.1177/1932296820905827
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: About 25% of adults >70years suffer from type 2 diabetes. Due to the heterogeneity of the geriatric population, guidelines emphasize the need to individualize glycemic goals and simplify treatment strategies with the main focus of avoiding hypoglycemia. The aim of this study was to assess glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes in geriatric care facilities based on their individual health status. Methods: 170 medical records of older adults with type 2 diabetes in geriatric care facilities were retrospectively assessed (64.7% female, age 809years; glycated hemoglobin 6.8%3.6% [51 +/- 16mmol/mol]; body mass index 27.9 +/- 5.8kg/m(2)). Based on the individual health status, patients were allocated to three groups (healthy n=27, complex n=86, and poor n=57). Results: The overall blood glucose (BG) value was highest in the poor health group with 188 +/- 47mg/dL (poor) vs 167 +/- 42mg/dL (complex) vs 150 +/- 34mg/dL (healthy). BG values of 1.6% (poor) vs 2.8% (complex) vs 1.5% (healthy) of patients were below 90mg/dL. 36.8% (poor) vs 23.4% (complex) vs 18.5% (healthy) of patients received insulin as the main diabetes therapy, but of these only 14.3% (poor) vs 20% (complex) vs 40% (healthy) were treated with basal insulin. Conclusions: Overall, BG values were higher in the poor and complex health group. There were a few low BG values in all groups. Although recommended by international guidelines, basal insulin therapy with its low complexity and low hypoglycemic risk is still underused, especially in the poor health group. Therefore, simplification of diabetes therapy should be considered further.
引用
收藏
页码:615 / 621
页数:7
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]   Management of Type 2 Diabetes in Older People [J].
Abdelhafiz, Ahmed H. ;
Sinclair, Alan J. .
DIABETES THERAPY, 2013, 4 (01) :13-26
[2]   Older Adults: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes-2018 [J].
不详 .
DIABETES CARE, 2018, 41 :S119-S125
[3]   10. Older Adults [J].
不详 .
DIABETES CARE, 2016, 39 :S81-S85
[4]   Standards of medical care in diabetes 2008 [J].
不详 .
DIABETES CARE, 2008, 31 :S12-S54
[5]   Economic Costs of Diabetes in the U.S. in 2012 [J].
Yang W. ;
Dall T.M. ;
Halder P. ;
Gallo P. ;
Kowal S.L. ;
Hogan P.F. ;
Petersen M. .
DIABETES CARE, 2013, 36 (04) :1033-1046
[6]   Nursing home patients with diabetes: Prevalence, drug treatment and glycemic control [J].
Andreassen, Lillan Mo ;
Sandberg, Sverre ;
Kristensen, Gunn Berit Berge ;
Solvik, Una Orvim ;
Kjome, Reidun Lisbet Skeide .
DIABETES RESEARCH AND CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2014, 105 (01) :102-109
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2013, MAN OLD PEOPL TYP 2
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2010, Diabetes management in the long-term care setting
[9]  
Bahrmann A, 2015, Z GERONTOL GERIATR, V48, P246, DOI 10.1007/s00391-014-0626-9
[10]  
Bahrmann A, 2010, Z GERONTOL GERIATR, V43, P386, DOI 10.1007/s00391-010-0104-y