Online and social media presence of Australian and New Zealand urologists

被引:36
作者
Davies, Nicholas [1 ]
Murphy, Declan G. [2 ]
van Rij, Simon [2 ]
Woo, Henry H. [4 ]
Lawrentschuk, Nathan [2 ,3 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Royal Hobart Hosp, Hobart, Tas, Australia
[2] Univ Melbourne, Div Canc Surg, Peter MacCallum Canc Ctr, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[3] Univ Melbourne, Dept Surg, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[4] Univ Sydney, Sch Clin, Sydney Adventist Hosp, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
[5] Austin Hosp, Olivia Newton John Canc Res Inst, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
关键词
social media; urology; Twitter; medico-legal; internet; ASSOCIATION; TWITTER;
D O I
10.1111/bju.13159
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective To assess the online and social media presence of all practising Australian and New Zealand urologists. Subjects and Methods In July 2014, all active members of the Urological Society of Australia and New Zealand (USANZ) were identified. A comprehensive search of Google and each social media platform (Facebook, Twitter, Linked In and You Tube) was undertaken for each urologist to identify any private websites or social media profiles. Results Of the 435 urologists currently practising in Australia and New Zealand, 305 (70.1%) have an easily identifiable social media account. Linkedln (51.3%) is the most commonly used form of social media followed by Twitter (33.3%) and private Facebook (30.1%) accounts. About half (49.8%) have a private business website. The average numb: of social media accounts per urologist is 1.42 and 16 urologists (3.7%) have an account with all searched social media platforms. Over half of those with a Twitter account (55.9%) follow a dedicated urology journal club and have a median (range) number of 'followers' of 12 (1-2 862). Social media users had a median (range) of 2 (0-8 717) 'tweets' on Twitter, 2 (1-45) Linkedln posts and 1 (1-14) YouTube video. Conclusion This study represents a unique dataset not relying on selection or recall bias but using data freely available to patients and colleagues to gauge social media presence of urologists. Most Australian and New Zealand urologists have a readily identifiable online and social media presence, with wideq)read and consistent use across both countries,
引用
收藏
页码:984 / 989
页数:6
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], REGISTER
[2]  
Australian Bureau of Statistics, AUSTR DEM STAT 2014
[3]  
Azu MC, 2012, AM SURGEON, V78, P555
[4]   A multilingual evaluation of current health information on the Internet for the treatments of benign prostatic hyperplasia [J].
Chen, Emily C. ;
Manecksha, Rustom P. ;
Abouassaly, Robert ;
Bolton, Damien M. ;
Reich, Oliver ;
Lawrentschuk, Nathan .
PROSTATE INTERNATIONAL, 2014, 2 (04) :161-168
[5]   Professionalism: Social media mishaps [J].
Collier, Roger .
CANADIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 2012, 184 (12) :E627-E628
[6]  
Duggan M., 2013, Social media update 2013
[7]   Online Reviews of 500 Urologists [J].
Ellimoottil, Chandy ;
Hart, Alissa ;
Greco, Kristin ;
Quek, Marcus L. ;
Farooq, Ahmer .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2013, 189 (06) :2269-2273
[8]  
Fox S., 2013, HLTH ONLINE 2013
[9]   Early adopters or laggards? Attitudes toward and use of social media among urologists [J].
Fuoco, Michael ;
Leveridge, Michael J. .
BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2015, 115 (03) :491-497
[10]   Oncology Health Information Quality on the Internet: a Multilingual Evaluation [J].
Lawrentschuk, Nathan ;
Sasges, Deborah ;
Tasevski, Robert ;
Abouassaly, Robert ;
Scott, Andrew M. ;
Davis, Ian D. .
ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2012, 19 (03) :706-713