Inter-University Sustainability Benchmarking for Canadian Higher Education Institutions: Water, Energy, and Carbon Flows for Technical-Level Decision-Making

被引:29
作者
Alghamdi, Abdulaziz [1 ]
Haider, Husnain [2 ]
Hewage, Kasun [1 ]
Sadiq, Rehan [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ British Columbia Okanagan, Sch Engn, 3333 Univ Way, Kelowna, BC V1V 1V7, Canada
[2] Qassim Univ, Coll Engn, Civil Engn Dept, Buraydah 52571, Qassim, Saudi Arabia
关键词
higher education institutions; sustainability assessment; benchmarking; energy flow; carbon flow; sustainable development; GREENHOUSE-GAS EMISSIONS; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; PERFORMANCE; INDICATORS; BUILDINGS; FRAMEWORK; CITIES; CHINA; TOOL;
D O I
10.3390/su11092599
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The education sector is one of the major contributors to the total greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in Canada, i.e., 16% of total emissions among 11 sectors. Canadian higher education institutions (HEIs) consume around 60% of the total energy fed to the educational sector. Existing tools holistically cover a wide array of functions to assess the sustainability of HEIs. The infrastructure (engineered) systems are the pivotal units responsible for the majority of energy and water consumption and may have been built, retrofitted, or replaced at different times using different materials and technologies. Consequently, infrastructures have varying efficiency, designs, building envelopes, and environmental impacts. For technical-level decision making for improving the engineered systems, HEIs need to be benchmarked on the basis of their water, energy, and carbon flows. A methodology is developed for sustainability assessment of 34 Canadian HEIs that are classified into small, medium, and large sizes based on their number of full-time equivalent students (FTE). Energy, water consumption, number of students, and floor area is measured in different units and are, thus, normalized. The study revealed that the energy source was the primary factor affecting the sustainability performance of an institution. The analysis also revealed that small-sized institutions outperformed medium-to-large-sized institutions.
引用
收藏
页数:26
相关论文
共 85 条
[1]  
AASHE, SUST TRACK ASS RAT S
[2]  
AASHE, SHER I TECHN ADV LEA
[3]  
AASHE, DALH U GREENH GAS EM
[4]  
AASHE, TECHN MAN VERS 2 1
[5]   Energy use assessment of educational buildings: Toward a campus-wide sustainable energy policy [J].
Agdas, Duzgun ;
Srinivasan, Ravi S. ;
Frost, Kevin ;
Masters, Forrest J. .
SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND SOCIETY, 2015, 17 :15-21
[6]   Towards a Definition of Environmental Sustainability Evaluation in Higher Education [J].
Alba-Hidalgo, David ;
Benayas del Alamo, Javier ;
Gutierrez-Perez, Jose .
HIGHER EDUCATION POLICY, 2018, 31 (04) :447-470
[7]  
Alberta E., 2015, ALBERTAS ELECTRICITY
[8]   Assessment tools' indicators for sustainability in universities: an analytical overview [J].
Alghamdi, Naif ;
den Heijer, Alexandra ;
de Jonge, Hans .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SUSTAINABILITY IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2017, 18 (01) :84-115
[9]   An integrated approach to achieving campus sustainability: assessment of the current campus environmental management practices [J].
Alshuwaikhat, Habib M. ;
Abubakar, Ismaila .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2008, 16 (16) :1777-1785
[10]   Energy efficiency interventions in UK higher education institutions [J].
Altan, Hasim .
ENERGY POLICY, 2010, 38 (12) :7722-7731