Cow genotyping strategies for genomic selection in a small dairy cattle population

被引:35
作者
Jenko, J. [1 ,2 ]
Wiggans, G. R. [3 ]
Cooper, T. A. [3 ]
Eaglen, S. A. E. [1 ,2 ]
Luff, W. G. de L. [4 ]
Bichard, M. [5 ]
Pong-Wong, R. [1 ,2 ]
Woolliams, J. A. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Edinburgh, Sch Vet Studies, Roslin Inst, Easter Bush EH25 9RG, Midlothian, Scotland
[2] Univ Edinburgh, Sch Vet Studies, Royal Dick Sch Vet Studies, Easter Bush EH25 9RG, Midlothian, Scotland
[3] USDA ARS, Beltsville Agr Res Ctr, Anim Genom & Improvement Lab, Beltsville, MD 20705 USA
[4] World Guernsey Cattle Fed, 10 Clos des Goddards,Rue Goddards, Castel GY5 7JD, Guernsey, England
[5] English Guernsey Cattle Soc, 12 Southgate St, Launceston PL15 9DP, Cornwall, England
基金
英国生物技术与生命科学研究理事会;
关键词
genomic selection; genotyping cows; cow genotyping strategies; Guernsey; BREEDING VALUES; INFORMATION; PREDICTION; ACCURACY; ASSOCIATION; IMPUTATION; RELATIVES; PEDIGREE; SCHEMES; IMPACT;
D O I
10.3168/jds.2016-11479
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
This study compares how different cow genotyping strategies increase the accuracy of genomic estimated breeding values (EBV) in dairy cattle breeds with low numbers. In these breeds, few sires have progeny records, and genotyping cows can improve the accuracy of genomic EBV. The Guernsey breed is a small dairy cattle breed with approximately 14,000 recorded individuals worldwide. Predictions of phenotypes of milk yield, fat yield, protein yield, and calving interval were made for Guernsey cows from England and Guernsey Island using genomic EBV, with training sets including 197 de-regressed proofs of genotyped bulls, with cows selected from among 1,440 genotyped cows using different genotyping strategies. Accuracies of predictions were tested using 10-fold cross-validation among the cows. Genomic EBV were predicted using 4 different methods: (1) pedigree BLUP, (2) genomic BLUP using only bulls, (3) univariate genomic BLUP using bulls and cows, and (4) bivariate genomic BLUP. Genotyping cows with phenotypes and using their data for the prediction of single nucleotide polymorphism effects increased the correlation between genomic EBV and phenotypes compared with using only bulls by 0.163 +/- 0.022 for milk yield, 0.111 +/- 0.021 for fat yield, and 0.113 +/- 0.018 for protein yield; a decrease of 0.014 +/- 0.010 for calving interval from a low base was the only exception. Genetic correlation between phenotypes from bulls and cows were approximately 0.6 for all yield traits and significantly different from 1. Only a very small change occurred in correlation between genomic EBV and phenotypes when using the bivariate model. It was always better to genotype all the cows, but when only half of the cows were genotyped, a divergent selection strategy was better compared with the random or directional selection approach. Divergent selection of 30% of the cows remained superior for the yield traits in 8 of 10 folds.
引用
收藏
页码:439 / 452
页数:14
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]  
Angeles Perez-Cabal M., 2012, Frontiers in Genetics, V3, P27, DOI 10.3389/fgene.2012.00027
[2]   Strategies for single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) genotyping to enhance genotype imputation in Gyr (Bos indicus) dairy cattle: Comparison of commercially available SNP chips [J].
Boison, S. A. ;
Santos, D. J. A. ;
Utsunomiya, A. H. T. ;
Carvalheiro, R. ;
Neves, H. H. R. ;
Perez O'Brien, A. M. ;
Garcia, J. F. ;
Soelkner, J. ;
da Silva, M. V. G. B. .
JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2015, 98 (07) :4969-4989
[3]   EFFECT OF SELECTION ON GENETIC VARIABILITY [J].
BULMER, MG .
AMERICAN NATURALIST, 1971, 105 (943) :201-+
[4]   Combining cow and bull reference populations to increase accuracy of genomic prediction and genome-wide association studies [J].
Calus, M. P. L. ;
de Haas, Y. ;
Veerkamp, R. F. .
JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2013, 96 (10) :6703-6715
[5]   The importance of information on relatives for the prediction of genomic breeding values and the implications for the makeup of reference data sets in livestock breeding schemes [J].
Clark, Samuel A. ;
Hickey, John M. ;
Daetwyler, Hans D. ;
van der Werf, Julius H. J. .
GENETICS SELECTION EVOLUTION, 2012, 44 :4
[6]   Practical implementation of cost-effective genomic selection in commercial pig breeding using imputation [J].
Cleveland, M. A. ;
Hickey, J. M. .
JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2013, 91 (08) :3583-3592
[7]   Genomic evaluation, breed identification, and population structure of Guernsey cattle in North America, Great Britain, and the Isle of Guernsey [J].
Cooper, T. A. ;
Eaglen, S. A. E. ;
Wiggans, G. R. ;
Jenko, J. ;
Huson, H. J. ;
Morrice, D. R. ;
Bichard, M. ;
Luff, W. G. de L. ;
Woolliams, J. A. .
JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2016, 99 (07) :5508-5515
[8]   Short communication: Analysis of genomic predictor population for Holstein dairy cattle in the United States-Effects of sex and age [J].
Cooper, T. A. ;
Wiggans, G. R. ;
VanRaden, P. M. .
JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2015, 98 (04) :2785-2788
[9]  
Daetwyler H. D., 2009, THESIS
[10]   The Impact of Genetic Architecture on Genome-Wide Evaluation Methods [J].
Daetwyler, Hans D. ;
Pong-Wong, Ricardo ;
Villanueva, Beatriz ;
Woolliams, John A. .
GENETICS, 2010, 185 (03) :1021-1031