Combined inner and outer loop feedback in an intelligent tutoring system for statistics in higher education

被引:8
作者
Tacoma, Sietske [1 ]
Drijvers, Paul [1 ]
Jeuring, Johan [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Utrecht, Freudenthal Inst, POB 85170, NL-3508 AD Utrecht, Netherlands
[2] Univ Utrecht, Dept Informat & Comp Sci, Utrecht, Netherlands
[3] Open Univ Netherlands, Dept Comp Sci, Heerlen, Netherlands
关键词
domain reasoner; feedback; inspectable student models; intelligent tutoring systems; statistics education; FORMATIVE ASSESSMENT; MODEL;
D O I
10.1111/jcal.12491
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Intelligent tutoring systems (ITSs) can provide inner loop feedback about steps within tasks, and outer loop feedback about performance on multiple tasks. While research typically addresses these feedback types separately, many ITSs offer them simultaneously. This study evaluates the effects of providing combined inner and outer loop feedback on social sciences students' learning process and performance in a first-year university statistics course. In a 2 x 2 factorial design (elaborate inner loop vs. minimal inner loop and outer loop vs. no outer loop feedback) with 521 participants, the effects of both feedback types and their combination were assessed through multiple linear regression models. Results showed mixed effects, depending on students' prior knowledge and experience, and no overall effects on course performance. Students tended to use outer loop feedback less when also receiving elaborate inner loop feedback. We therefore recommend introducing feedback types one by one and offering them for substantial periods of time.
引用
收藏
页码:319 / 332
页数:14
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]   Evaluating the Effect of Uncertainty Visualisation in Open Learner Models on Students' Metacognitive Skills [J].
Al-Shanfari, Lamiya ;
Epp, Carrie Demmans ;
Baber, Chris .
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN EDUCATION, AIED 2017, 2017, 10331 :15-27
[2]   Cognitive tutors: Lessons learned [J].
Anderson, JR ;
Corbett, AT ;
Koedinger, KR ;
Pelletier, R .
JOURNAL OF THE LEARNING SCIENCES, 1995, 4 (02) :167-207
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2007, International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, DOI 10.1007/3-540-47952-X_31
[4]  
Arroyo I, 2007, FRONT ARTIF INTEL AP, V158, P195
[5]  
Brusilovsky P., 2007, The Adaptive Web. Methods and Strategies of Web Personalization, P3, DOI 10.1007/978-3-540-72079-9_1
[6]   The Value of Social: Comparing Open Student Modeling and Open Social Student Modeling [J].
Brusilovsky, Peter ;
Somyurek, Sibel ;
Guerra, Julio ;
Hosseini, Roya ;
Zadorozhny, Vladimir .
USER MODELING, ADAPTATION AND PERSONALIZATION, 2015, 9146 :44-55
[7]   SMILI (sic): a Framework for Interfaces to Learning Data in Open Learner Models, Learning Analytics and Related Fields [J].
Bull, Susan ;
Kay, Judy .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN EDUCATION, 2016, 26 (01) :293-331
[8]  
Castro Sotos A. E., 2007, Educational Research Review, V2, P98, DOI [DOI 10.1016/J.EDUREV.2007.04.001, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2007.04.001]
[9]  
Drijvers P., 2013, P ICMI STUD 22 TASK, P52
[10]   Making Sense of Assessment Feedback in Higher Education [J].
Evans, Carol .
REVIEW OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH, 2013, 83 (01) :70-120