Comparison of perioperative outcomes and cost of robotic-assisted laparoscopy, laparoscopy and laparotomy for endometrial cancer

被引:97
作者
Coronado, Pluvio J. [1 ]
Herraiz, Miguel A. [1 ]
Magrina, Javier F. [2 ]
Fasero, Maria [3 ]
Vidart, Jose A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Complutense Madrid, Hosp Clin San Carlos, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, E-28040 Madrid, Spain
[2] Mayo Clin Scottsdale, Dept Gynecol Surg, Scottsdale, AZ USA
[3] Hosp La Zarzuela Madrid, Madrid, Spain
关键词
Endometrial cancer; Robotic; Laparoscopy; Survival; Cost; SURGICAL OUTCOMES; HYSTERECTOMY; LYMPHADENECTOMY; SURGERY; PROGRAM; SAFETY; OBESE; WOMEN;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejogrb.2012.07.006
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: To analyze the perioperative outcomes and cost of three surgical approaches in the treatment of endometrial cancer: robotic, laparoscopy and laparotomy. Study design: We studied 347 patients with endometrial cancer treated in a single institution: 71 patients were operated by robotics, 84 by conventional laparoscopy and 192 by laparotomy. All patients underwent total hysterectomy, bilateral salpingoophorectomy and pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy depending on the pathological features. Results: Operative time was longer in the laparoscopy group as compared to robotics and laparotomy (218.2 min, 189.2 min, and 157.4 min respectively, p = 0.000). The estimated blood loss was lower in the robotic group relative to the other groups (99.4 ml in robotic, 190.0 ml in laparoscopy and 231.5 ml in laparotomy, p = 0.000). Similar findings were observed for the pre- and post-operative mean hemoglobin levels (-1.3 g/dl, -2.3 g/dl and -2.5 g/dl respectively, p = 0.000), and transfusion rate (4.2%, 7.1% and 14.1% respectively, p = 0.036). The length of hospital stay was higher in the laparotomy group compared to robotics and laparoscopy (8.1, 3.5 and 4.6 days respectively; p = 0.000). The conversion rate to laparotomy was lower for robotics (2.4% for robotics and 8.1% for laparoscopy, p = 0.181). Overall complications were similar for robotics and laparoscopy (21.1%, 28.5%) (p = 0.079). Robotic complications were significantly lower as compared to laparotomy (21.2 vs 34.9% (p = 0.036). No differences were found relative to disease-free or overall survival among the three groups. The global costs were similar for the three approaches (p = 0.566). Conclusion: Robotics is a safe alternative to laparoscopy and laparotomy for endometrial cancer patients, offering improved perioperative outcomes and similar cost as compared to the other two surgical approaches. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:289 / 294
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A Comparison of Outcomes Between Open Hysterectomy and Robotic-Assisted Hysterectomy for Endometrial Cancer Using the National Cancer Database
    Safdieh, Joseph
    Lee, Yi-Chun
    Wong, Andrew
    Lee, Anna
    Weiner, Joseph P.
    Schwartz, David
    Schreiber, David
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2017, 27 (07) : 1508 - 1516
  • [32] Robotic radical hysterectomy: Comparison with laparoscopy and laparotomy
    Magrina, Javier F.
    Kho, Rosanne M.
    Weaver, Amy L.
    Montero, Regina P.
    Magtibay, Paul M.
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2008, 109 (01) : 86 - 91
  • [33] Comparison of Laparoscopy and Laparotomy for Management of Endometrial Carcinoma A Meta-analysis
    Ju, Woong
    Myung, Seung-Kwon
    Kim, Yeol
    Choi, Hyuck Jae
    Kim, Seung Cheol
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2009, 19 (03) : 400 - 406
  • [34] Sentinel lymph node biopsy for robotic-assisted endometrial cancer staging: further improvement of perioperative outcomes
    Casarin, Jvan
    Multinu, Francesco
    Tortorella, Lucia
    Cappuccio, Serena
    Weaver, Amy L.
    Ghezzi, Fabio
    Cilby, William
    Kumar, Amanika
    Langstraat, Carrie
    Glaser, Gretchen
    Mariani, Andrea
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2020, 30 (01) : 41 - 47
  • [35] Comparing robotic surgery with laparoscopy and laparotomy for endometrial cancer management: A cohort study
    Chiou, Hung-Yi
    Chiu, Li-Hsuan
    Chen, Ching-Hui
    Yen, Yuan-Kuei
    Chang, Ching-Wen
    Liu, Wei-Min
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2015, 13 : 17 - 22
  • [36] Comparison of tissue damage and inflammation for robotic laparoscopy and conventional laparoscopy in early endometrial cancer
    Meng, Shengnan
    Cao, Yanling
    Shen, Qingwei
    Dong, Ling
    Wang, Nan
    FRONTIERS IN MEDICINE, 2024, 11
  • [37] Adverse events associated with laparoscopy vs laparotomy in the treatment of endometrial cancer
    Barnett, Jason C.
    Havrilesky, Laura J.
    Bondurant, Amy E.
    Fleming, Nicole D.
    Lee, Paula S.
    Secord, Angeles Alvarez
    Berchuck, Andrew
    Valea, Fidel A.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2011, 205 (02) : 143.e1 - 143.e6
  • [38] Cost effectiveness of laparoscopy versus laparotomy in early stage endometrial cancer: A randomised trial
    Bijen, Claudia B.
    Vermeulen, Karin M.
    Mourits, Marian J.
    Arts, Henriette J.
    ter Brugge, Henk G.
    van der Sijde, Rob
    Wijma, Jacobus
    Bongers, Marlies Y.
    van der Zee, Ate G.
    de Bock, Geertruida H.
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2011, 121 (01) : 76 - 82
  • [39] Quality of Life in Patients Affected by Endometrial Cancer: Comparison Among Laparotomy, Laparoscopy and Vaginal Approach
    Berretta, Roberto
    Gizzo, Salvatore
    Noventa, Marco
    Marrazzo, Vivienne
    Franchi, Laura
    Migliavacca, Costanza
    Michela, Monica
    Merisio, Carla
    Modena, Alberto Bacchi
    Patrelli, Tito Silvio
    PATHOLOGY & ONCOLOGY RESEARCH, 2015, 21 (03) : 811 - 816