Comparison of perioperative outcomes and cost of robotic-assisted laparoscopy, laparoscopy and laparotomy for endometrial cancer

被引:97
|
作者
Coronado, Pluvio J. [1 ]
Herraiz, Miguel A. [1 ]
Magrina, Javier F. [2 ]
Fasero, Maria [3 ]
Vidart, Jose A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Complutense Madrid, Hosp Clin San Carlos, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, E-28040 Madrid, Spain
[2] Mayo Clin Scottsdale, Dept Gynecol Surg, Scottsdale, AZ USA
[3] Hosp La Zarzuela Madrid, Madrid, Spain
关键词
Endometrial cancer; Robotic; Laparoscopy; Survival; Cost; SURGICAL OUTCOMES; HYSTERECTOMY; LYMPHADENECTOMY; SURGERY; PROGRAM; SAFETY; OBESE; WOMEN;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejogrb.2012.07.006
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: To analyze the perioperative outcomes and cost of three surgical approaches in the treatment of endometrial cancer: robotic, laparoscopy and laparotomy. Study design: We studied 347 patients with endometrial cancer treated in a single institution: 71 patients were operated by robotics, 84 by conventional laparoscopy and 192 by laparotomy. All patients underwent total hysterectomy, bilateral salpingoophorectomy and pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy depending on the pathological features. Results: Operative time was longer in the laparoscopy group as compared to robotics and laparotomy (218.2 min, 189.2 min, and 157.4 min respectively, p = 0.000). The estimated blood loss was lower in the robotic group relative to the other groups (99.4 ml in robotic, 190.0 ml in laparoscopy and 231.5 ml in laparotomy, p = 0.000). Similar findings were observed for the pre- and post-operative mean hemoglobin levels (-1.3 g/dl, -2.3 g/dl and -2.5 g/dl respectively, p = 0.000), and transfusion rate (4.2%, 7.1% and 14.1% respectively, p = 0.036). The length of hospital stay was higher in the laparotomy group compared to robotics and laparoscopy (8.1, 3.5 and 4.6 days respectively; p = 0.000). The conversion rate to laparotomy was lower for robotics (2.4% for robotics and 8.1% for laparoscopy, p = 0.181). Overall complications were similar for robotics and laparoscopy (21.1%, 28.5%) (p = 0.079). Robotic complications were significantly lower as compared to laparotomy (21.2 vs 34.9% (p = 0.036). No differences were found relative to disease-free or overall survival among the three groups. The global costs were similar for the three approaches (p = 0.566). Conclusion: Robotics is a safe alternative to laparoscopy and laparotomy for endometrial cancer patients, offering improved perioperative outcomes and similar cost as compared to the other two surgical approaches. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:289 / 294
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Comparison of Robotic-Assisted and Conventional Laparoscopy in the Management of Adnexal Masses
    El Khouly, N. I.
    Barr, R. L.
    Kim, B. B.
    Jeng, C. J.
    Nagarsheth, N. P.
    Fishman, D. A.
    Nezhat, F. R.
    Gretz, H. F.
    Chuang, L. T.
    JOURNAL OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE GYNECOLOGY, 2014, 21 (06) : 1071 - 1074
  • [22] Robotic-assisted surgery in the management of endometrial cancer
    Holloway, Robert W.
    Ahmad, Sarfraz
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY RESEARCH, 2012, 38 (01) : 1 - 8
  • [23] Comparison of robotic-assisted surgery outcomes with laparotomy for endometrial cancer staging in Turkey
    Ahmet Göçmen
    Fatih Şanlıkan
    Mustafa Gazi Uçar
    Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 2010, 282 : 539 - 545
  • [24] Surgical treatment of endometrial cancer: laparotomy or laparoscopy?
    Majchrzak-Baczmanska, Dominika
    Antosiak, Beata
    Malinowski, Andrzej
    MENOPAUSE REVIEW-PRZEGLAD MENOPAUZALNY, 2013, 12 (02): : 125 - 131
  • [25] Surgical treatment of endometrioid endometrial carcinoma - laparotomy versus laparoscopy
    Baum, Sascha
    Alkatout, Ibrahim
    Proppe, Louisa
    Kotanidis, Christos
    Rody, Achim
    Lagana, Antonio Simone
    Sommer, Soteris
    Gitas, George
    JOURNAL OF THE TURKISH-GERMAN GYNECOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION, 2022, 23 (04) : 233 - 240
  • [26] The role of laparoscopy in the surgical treatment of endometrial cancer
    Pawlowicz, Pawel S.
    Ajdacka, Urszula
    VIDEOSURGERY AND OTHER MINIINVASIVE TECHNIQUES, 2015, 10 (01) : 44 - 48
  • [27] Survival outcomes for robotic-assisted laparoscopy versus traditional laparoscopy in clinical stage I epithelial ovarian cancer
    Facer, Benjin
    Wang, Fei
    Grijalva, Carlos G.
    Alvarez, Ronald D.
    Shu, Xiao-Ou
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2020, 222 (05) : 474.e1 - 474.e12
  • [28] Herniation formation in women undergoing robotically assisted laparoscopy or laparotomy for endometrial cancer
    Schiavone, Maria B.
    Bielen, Maciej S.
    Gardner, Ginger J.
    Zivanovic, Oliver
    Jewell, Elizabeth L.
    Sonoda, Yukio
    Barakat, Richard R.
    Chi, Dennis S.
    Abu-Rustum, Nadeem R.
    Leitao, Mario M., Jr.
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2016, 140 (03) : 383 - 386
  • [29] Laparoscopic vs. robotic-assisted laparoscopy in endometrial cancer staging: large retrospective single-institution study
    Perrone, Emanuele
    Capasso, Ilaria
    Pasciuto, Tina
    Gioe, Alessandro
    Alletti, Salvatore Gueli
    Restaino, Stefano
    Scambia, Giovanni
    Fanfani, Francesco
    JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2021, 32 (03)
  • [30] Laparoscopy versus laparotomy for surgical treatment of obese women with endometrial cancer: A cost-benefit comparative analysis
    Capozzi, Vito Andrea
    Sozzi, Giulio
    Gambino, Giulia
    Cianciolo, Alessandra
    Ricco, Matteo
    Monfardini, Luciano
    Gaiano, Michela
    Chiantera, Vito
    Uccella, Stefano
    Berretta, Roberto
    MOLECULAR AND CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2019, 11 (04) : 335 - 342