Comparison of perioperative outcomes and cost of robotic-assisted laparoscopy, laparoscopy and laparotomy for endometrial cancer

被引:99
作者
Coronado, Pluvio J. [1 ]
Herraiz, Miguel A. [1 ]
Magrina, Javier F. [2 ]
Fasero, Maria [3 ]
Vidart, Jose A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Complutense Madrid, Hosp Clin San Carlos, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, E-28040 Madrid, Spain
[2] Mayo Clin Scottsdale, Dept Gynecol Surg, Scottsdale, AZ USA
[3] Hosp La Zarzuela Madrid, Madrid, Spain
关键词
Endometrial cancer; Robotic; Laparoscopy; Survival; Cost; SURGICAL OUTCOMES; HYSTERECTOMY; LYMPHADENECTOMY; SURGERY; PROGRAM; SAFETY; OBESE; WOMEN;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejogrb.2012.07.006
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: To analyze the perioperative outcomes and cost of three surgical approaches in the treatment of endometrial cancer: robotic, laparoscopy and laparotomy. Study design: We studied 347 patients with endometrial cancer treated in a single institution: 71 patients were operated by robotics, 84 by conventional laparoscopy and 192 by laparotomy. All patients underwent total hysterectomy, bilateral salpingoophorectomy and pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy depending on the pathological features. Results: Operative time was longer in the laparoscopy group as compared to robotics and laparotomy (218.2 min, 189.2 min, and 157.4 min respectively, p = 0.000). The estimated blood loss was lower in the robotic group relative to the other groups (99.4 ml in robotic, 190.0 ml in laparoscopy and 231.5 ml in laparotomy, p = 0.000). Similar findings were observed for the pre- and post-operative mean hemoglobin levels (-1.3 g/dl, -2.3 g/dl and -2.5 g/dl respectively, p = 0.000), and transfusion rate (4.2%, 7.1% and 14.1% respectively, p = 0.036). The length of hospital stay was higher in the laparotomy group compared to robotics and laparoscopy (8.1, 3.5 and 4.6 days respectively; p = 0.000). The conversion rate to laparotomy was lower for robotics (2.4% for robotics and 8.1% for laparoscopy, p = 0.181). Overall complications were similar for robotics and laparoscopy (21.1%, 28.5%) (p = 0.079). Robotic complications were significantly lower as compared to laparotomy (21.2 vs 34.9% (p = 0.036). No differences were found relative to disease-free or overall survival among the three groups. The global costs were similar for the three approaches (p = 0.566). Conclusion: Robotics is a safe alternative to laparoscopy and laparotomy for endometrial cancer patients, offering improved perioperative outcomes and similar cost as compared to the other two surgical approaches. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:289 / 294
页数:6
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2010, Cancer Facts Figures 2010
[2]   Comparison of outcomes and cost for endometrial cancer staging via traditional laparotomy, standard laparoscopy and robotic techniques [J].
Bell, Maria C. ;
Torgerson, Jenny ;
Seshadri-Kreaden, Usha ;
Suttle, Allison Wierda ;
Hunt, Sharon .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2008, 111 (03) :407-411
[3]   Ergonomic problems associated with laparoscopic surgery [J].
Berguer, R ;
Forkey, DL ;
Smith, WD .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY-ULTRASOUND AND INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 1999, 13 (05) :466-468
[4]   A case-control study of robot-assisted type III radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymph node dissection compared with open radical hysterectomy [J].
Boggess, John F. ;
Gehrig, Paola A. ;
Cantrell, Leigh ;
Shafer, Aaron ;
Ridgway, Mildred ;
Skinner, Elizabeth N. ;
Fowler, Wesley C. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2008, 199 (04) :357.e1-357.e7
[5]   Surgical outcomes of robotic-assisted surgical staging for endometrial cancer are equivalent to traditional laparoscopic staging at a minimally invasive surgical center [J].
Cardenas-Goicoechea, Joel ;
Adams, Sarah ;
Bhat, Suneel B. ;
Randall, Thomas C. .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2010, 117 (02) :224-228
[6]   Robotically assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy for endometrial cancer [J].
DeNardis, Sara A. ;
Holloway, Robert W. ;
Bigsby, Glenn E. ;
Pikaart, Dirk P. ;
Ahmad, Sarfraz ;
Finkler, Neil J. .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2008, 111 (03) :412-417
[7]   Robotic radical hysterectomy [J].
Fanning, James ;
Fenton, Bradford ;
Purohit, Manisha .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2008, 198 (06) :649.e1-649.e4
[8]  
Ferlay J., 2010, IARC CancerBase, V10
[9]   Robotic-Assisted Hysterectomy for Endometrial Cancer Compared With Traditional Laparoscopic and Laparotomy Approaches A Systematic Review [J].
Gaia, Giorgia ;
Holloway, Robert W. ;
Santoro, Luigi ;
Ahmad, Sarfraz ;
Di Silverio, Elena ;
Spinillo, Arsenio .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2010, 116 (06) :1422-1431
[10]   What is the optimal minimally invasive surgical procedure for endometrial cancer staging in the obese and morbidly obese woman? [J].
Gehrig, Paola A. ;
Cantrell, Leigh A. ;
Shafer, Aaron ;
Abaid, Lisa N. ;
Mendivil, Alberto ;
Boggess, John F. .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2008, 111 (01) :41-45