Comparison of perioperative outcomes and cost of robotic-assisted laparoscopy, laparoscopy and laparotomy for endometrial cancer

被引:97
|
作者
Coronado, Pluvio J. [1 ]
Herraiz, Miguel A. [1 ]
Magrina, Javier F. [2 ]
Fasero, Maria [3 ]
Vidart, Jose A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Complutense Madrid, Hosp Clin San Carlos, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, E-28040 Madrid, Spain
[2] Mayo Clin Scottsdale, Dept Gynecol Surg, Scottsdale, AZ USA
[3] Hosp La Zarzuela Madrid, Madrid, Spain
关键词
Endometrial cancer; Robotic; Laparoscopy; Survival; Cost; SURGICAL OUTCOMES; HYSTERECTOMY; LYMPHADENECTOMY; SURGERY; PROGRAM; SAFETY; OBESE; WOMEN;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejogrb.2012.07.006
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: To analyze the perioperative outcomes and cost of three surgical approaches in the treatment of endometrial cancer: robotic, laparoscopy and laparotomy. Study design: We studied 347 patients with endometrial cancer treated in a single institution: 71 patients were operated by robotics, 84 by conventional laparoscopy and 192 by laparotomy. All patients underwent total hysterectomy, bilateral salpingoophorectomy and pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy depending on the pathological features. Results: Operative time was longer in the laparoscopy group as compared to robotics and laparotomy (218.2 min, 189.2 min, and 157.4 min respectively, p = 0.000). The estimated blood loss was lower in the robotic group relative to the other groups (99.4 ml in robotic, 190.0 ml in laparoscopy and 231.5 ml in laparotomy, p = 0.000). Similar findings were observed for the pre- and post-operative mean hemoglobin levels (-1.3 g/dl, -2.3 g/dl and -2.5 g/dl respectively, p = 0.000), and transfusion rate (4.2%, 7.1% and 14.1% respectively, p = 0.036). The length of hospital stay was higher in the laparotomy group compared to robotics and laparoscopy (8.1, 3.5 and 4.6 days respectively; p = 0.000). The conversion rate to laparotomy was lower for robotics (2.4% for robotics and 8.1% for laparoscopy, p = 0.181). Overall complications were similar for robotics and laparoscopy (21.1%, 28.5%) (p = 0.079). Robotic complications were significantly lower as compared to laparotomy (21.2 vs 34.9% (p = 0.036). No differences were found relative to disease-free or overall survival among the three groups. The global costs were similar for the three approaches (p = 0.566). Conclusion: Robotics is a safe alternative to laparoscopy and laparotomy for endometrial cancer patients, offering improved perioperative outcomes and similar cost as compared to the other two surgical approaches. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:289 / 294
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Robotic surgery for endometrial cancer: comparison of perioperative outcomes and recurrence with laparoscopy, vaginal/laparoscopy and laparotomy
    Magrina, J. F.
    Zanagnolo, V.
    Giles, D.
    Noble, B. N.
    Kho, R. M. C.
    Magtibay, P. M.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF GYNAECOLOGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2011, 32 (05) : 476 - 480
  • [2] Survival outcomes of robotic-assisted laparoscopy versus conventional laparoscopy and laparotomy for endometrial cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Fu, Hanlin
    Zhang, Jiahui
    Zhao, Shiyi
    He, Nannan
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2023, 174 : 55 - 67
  • [3] Learning Curve and Surgical Outcome for Robotic-Assisted Hysterectomy with Lymphadenectomy: Case-Matched Controlled Comparison with Laparoscopy and Laparotomy for Treatment of Endometrial Cancer
    Lim, Peter C.
    Kang, Elizabeth
    Park, Do Hwan
    JOURNAL OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE GYNECOLOGY, 2010, 17 (06) : 739 - 748
  • [4] Comparison of laparoscopy and laparotomy for endometrial cancer
    Zhang, Hui
    Cui, Jing
    Jia, Lin
    Hong, Shuhui
    Kong, Beihua
    Li, Dadong
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2012, 116 (03) : 185 - 191
  • [5] Perioperative Outcomes in Robotic-Assisted Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Treatment of Endometrial Cancer
    Nezhat, Farr R.
    Apostol, Radu
    Vega, Mario
    Sirota, Ido
    Vetere, Patrick F.
    JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGIC SURGERY, 2019, 35 (06) : 350 - 355
  • [6] Comparison of Perioperative Outcomes and Cost Between Robotic-Assisted and Conventional Laparoscopy for Transperitoneal Infrarenal Para-aortic Lymphadenectomy (TIPAL)
    Coronado, Pluvio J.
    Fasero, Maria
    Magrina, Javier F.
    Herraiz, Miguel A.
    Vidart, Jose A.
    JOURNAL OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE GYNECOLOGY, 2014, 21 (04) : 674 - 681
  • [7] Comparison of outcomes and cost for endometrial cancer staging via traditional laparotomy, standard laparoscopy and robotic techniques
    Bell, Maria C.
    Torgerson, Jenny
    Seshadri-Kreaden, Usha
    Suttle, Allison Wierda
    Hunt, Sharon
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2008, 111 (03) : 407 - 411
  • [8] Survival Impact of Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopy (RAL) vs. Conventional Laparoscopy (LPS) in the Treatment of Endometrial Cancer
    Delso, Vanesa
    Hoyo, Rafael Sanchez-del
    Sanchez-Barderas, Lucia
    Gracia, Myriam
    Baquedano, Laura
    Martinez-Maestre, Maria A.
    Fasero, Maria
    Coronado, Pluvio J.
    CANCERS, 2025, 17 (03)
  • [9] Costs of Robotic-Assisted Versus Traditional Laparoscopy in Endometrial Cancer
    Vuorinen, Riikka-Liisa K.
    Maenpaa, Minna M.
    Nieminen, Kari
    Tomas, Eija I.
    Luukkaala, Tiina H.
    Auvinen, Anssi
    Maenpaa, Johanna U.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2017, 27 (08) : 1788 - 1793
  • [10] Robot-Assisted Staging Using Three Robotic Arms for Endometrial Cancer: Comparison to Laparoscopy and Laparotomy at a Single Institution
    Jung, Yong Wook
    Lee, Dae Woo
    Kim, Sang Wun
    Nam, Eun Ji
    Kim, Jae Hoon
    Kim, Jae Wook
    Kim, Young Tae
    JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2010, 101 (02) : 116 - 121