Resistant hypertension? Assessment of adherence by toxicological urine analysis

被引:364
作者
Jung, Oliver [1 ]
Gechter, Janis L. [1 ]
Wunder, Cora [2 ]
Paulke, Alexander [2 ]
Bartel, Christine [1 ]
Geiger, Helmut [1 ]
Toennes, Stefan W. [2 ]
机构
[1] Goethe Univ Frankfurt, Dept Nephrol, D-60054 Frankfurt, Germany
[2] Goethe Univ Frankfurt, Inst Legal Med, Forens Toxicol Dept, D-60054 Frankfurt, Germany
关键词
adherence; liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry; resistant hypertension; toxicological screening; urine analysis; BLOOD-PRESSURE CONTROL; CHROMATOGRAPHY-MASS-SPECTROMETRY; BETA-BLOCKERS; MEDICATION ADHERENCE; COST-EFFECTIVENESS; RENAL DENERVATION; UNITED-STATES; THERAPY; DRUG; IDENTIFICATION;
D O I
10.1097/HJH.0b013e32835e2286
中图分类号
R6 [外科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100210 ;
摘要
Objective: Uncontrolled hypertension under antihypertensive multidrug regimen is not necessarily always true resistance. Incomplete adherence is one of several possible causes of uncontrolled hypertension. Nonadherence remains largely unrecognized and is falsely interpreted as treatment resistance, as it is difficult to confirm or exclude objectively. This is the first study assessing adherence in patients with apparent resistant hypertension systematically via toxicological urine screening. Methods: All patients referred from primary care physicians because of uncontrolled hypertension between 2004 and 2011 were analysed. Adherence was assessed in all patients with uncontrolled hypertension despite the concurrent use of at least four antihypertensive agents by using liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry analysis for antihypertensive drugs or their corresponding metabolites in urine. Results: A total of 375 patients with uncontrolled hypertension were referred. After optimization of drug therapy and exclusion of white coat hypertension, 108 patients met criteria for resistant hypertension. Of those, 15 patients had secondary causes of hypertension and 17 achieved goal blood pressure with quadruple antihypertensive therapy. Of the remaining 76 patients, 40 patients (53%) were found to be nonadherent. Among nonadherent patients, 30% had complete and 70% had incomplete adherence; 85% of the latter had taken less than 50% of drugs prescribed. Lack of adherence was almost evenly distributed between different classes of antihypertensive drugs. Conclusion: Low adherence was the most common cause of poor blood pressure control in patients with apparent resistant hypertension, being twice as frequent as secondary causes of hypertension. Incomplete adherence was far more common than complete nonadherence; thus, assessment of adherence in patients on multiple drug regime is only reliable when all drugs are included in assessment. Assessing adherence by toxicological urine screening is a useful tool in detecting low adherence, especially in the setting of multidrug regimen as a cause of apparently resistant hypertension.
引用
收藏
页码:766 / 774
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]   Resistant Hypertension Bad and Getting Worse [J].
Ahmed, Mustafa I. ;
Calhoun, David A. .
HYPERTENSION, 2011, 57 (06) :1045-1046
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2004, COCHRANE DATABASE SY
[3]   How common is true resistant hypertension? [J].
Bunker, J. ;
Callister, W. ;
Chang, C-L ;
Sever, P. S. .
JOURNAL OF HUMAN HYPERTENSION, 2011, 25 (02) :137-140
[4]   Monitoring compliance in resistant hypertension: an important step in patient management [J].
Burnier, M ;
Santschi, V ;
Favrat, B ;
Brunner, HR .
JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 2003, 21 :S37-S42
[5]   Electronic compliance monitoring in resistant hypertension:: the basis for rational therapeutic decisions [J].
Burnier, M ;
Schneider, MP ;
Chioléro, A ;
Stubi, CLF ;
Brunner, HR .
JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 2001, 19 (02) :335-341
[6]   Resistant hypertension: Diagnosis, evaluation, and treatment - A scientific statement from the American Heart Association Professional Education Committee of the Council for High Blood Pressure Research (Reprinted from Hypertension, vol 51, pg 1403-1419, 2008) [J].
Calhoun, David A. ;
Jones, Daniel ;
Textor, Stephen ;
Goff, David C. ;
Murphy, Timothy P. ;
Toto, Robert D. ;
White, Anthony ;
Cushman, William C. ;
White, William ;
Sica, Domenic ;
Ferdinand, Keith ;
Giles, Thomas D. ;
Falkner, Bonita ;
Carey, Robert M. .
CIRCULATION, 2008, 117 (25) :E510-E526
[7]   The cost and effectiveness of adherence-improving interventions for antihypertensive and lipid-lowering drugs [J].
Chapman, R. H. ;
Ferrufino, C. P. ;
Kowal, S. L. ;
Classi, P. ;
Roberts, C. S. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2010, 64 (02) :169-181
[8]   The Clinical and Economic Burden of Nonadherence with Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Therapy in Hypertensive Patients [J].
Cherry, Spencer B. ;
Benner, Joshua S. ;
Hussein, Mohamed A. ;
Tang, Simon S. K. ;
Nichol, Michael B. .
VALUE IN HEALTH, 2009, 12 (04) :489-497
[9]  
CHOBANIAN AV, 2003, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC, V289, P2560, DOI DOI 10.1161/01.HYP.0000107251.49515.C2
[10]   The Implications of Therapeutic Complexity on Adherence to Cardiovascular Medications [J].
Choudhry, Niteesh K. ;
Fischer, Michael A. ;
Avorn, Jerry ;
Liberman, Joshua N. ;
Schneeweiss, Sebastian ;
Pakes, Juliana ;
Brennan, Troyen A. ;
Shrank, William H. .
ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2011, 171 (09) :814-822