Selective approach in the treatment of esophageal perforations

被引:54
作者
Amir, AI
von Dullemen, H
Plukker, JTM
机构
[1] Univ Groningen Hosp, Dept Surg, NL-9700 RB Groningen, Netherlands
[2] Univ Groningen Hosp, Dept Gastroenterol, NL-9700 RB Groningen, Netherlands
关键词
esophageal perforation; selective individualized treatment;
D O I
10.1080/00365520410004316
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Treatment of esophageal perforation remains controversial and recommendations vary from initially non-operative to aggressive surgical management. Several factors are responsible for this life-threatening event, which has led to more individualized treatment ensuring adequate pleuromediastinal drainage with sufficient irrigation. We analyzed our data, evaluating morbidity and mortality in this selective approach. Methods: During 1985 to 2001, 17 of the 38 patients with esophageal perforation treated in our hospital underwent primarily a thoracotomy, wide drainage and debridement of chest/mediastinum and enteral hyperalimentation. Twenty-one patients (55%) initially were treated non-operatively (NPO, nasogastric tube, hyperalimentation, antibiotics and chest tube), but surgery was required in 9 patients (43%). Results: Most perforations were iatrogenic (45%; 17/38) followed by spontaneous perforations (32%; 12/38). Cervical perforations were managed earlier (<24 h) than thoracic tears, 8/10 (80%) and 17/28 (61%) respectively. Initial conservative treatment failed in all spontaneous ruptures and more in thoracic lesions (62%) than in cervical lesions (13%). Most patients with thoracic perforations and 'free' intrathoracic contamination underwent primary surgery. Surgery with adequate drainage (n = 23) was based on signs of sepsis, empyema and progression of pneumomediastinum/thorax. Mortality occurred in one patient (3%), initially treated conservatively. Median intensive care and duration of hospitalization were not different between the conservative (5 and 7 days, respectively) and the primary surgical approach (21 and 27 days, respectively), but were higher after secondary surgery (13 and 50 days, respectively). Conclusions: Spontaneous esophageal perforations require early surgical exploration with drainage and irrigation of mediastinum and pleural cavity, while most iatrogenic lesions can be managed conservatively. Cervical perforations can be treated adequately non-operatively, but thoracic perforations often require surgical intervention.
引用
收藏
页码:418 / 422
页数:5
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]   Nonoperative management of esophageal perforations - Is it justified? [J].
Altorjay, A ;
Kiss, J ;
Voros, A ;
Bohak, A .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 1997, 225 (04) :415-421
[2]   The role of esophagectomy in the management of esophageal perforations [J].
Altorjay, A ;
Kiss, J ;
Vörös, A ;
Szirányi, E .
ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 1998, 65 (05) :1433-1436
[3]   ESOPHAGEAL-PERFORATION - A THERAPEUTIC CHALLENGE [J].
ATTAR, S ;
HANKINS, JR ;
SUTER, CM ;
COUGHLIN, TR ;
SEQUEIRA, A ;
MCLAUGHLIN, JS .
ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 1990, 50 (01) :45-51
[4]   Treatment of endoscopic esophageal perforation [J].
Fernandez, FF ;
Richter, A ;
Freudenberg, S ;
Wendl, K ;
Manegold, BC .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY-ULTRASOUND AND INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 1999, 13 (10) :962-966
[5]  
FLYNN AE, 1989, ARCH SURG-CHICAGO, V124, P1211
[6]   Assessment of spontaneous pneumomediastinum: Experience with 12 patients [J].
Jougon, JB ;
Ballester, M ;
Delcambre, F ;
Mac Bride, T ;
Dromer, CEH ;
Velly, JF .
ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2003, 75 (06) :1711-1714
[7]   Multimodality treatment of esophageal disruptions [J].
Kotsis, L ;
Kostic, S ;
Zubovits, K .
CHEST, 1997, 112 (05) :1304-1309
[8]  
Maier A, 2001, HEPATO-GASTROENTEROL, V48, P1368
[9]   Thoracoscopic management of postoperative esophageal leak [J].
Nguyen, NT ;
Follette, DM ;
Roberts, PF ;
Goodnight, JE .
JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2001, 121 (02) :391-392
[10]   PRIMARY REPAIR OF IATROGENIC THORACIC ESOPHAGEAL-PERFORATION AND BOERHAAVES-SYNDROME [J].
OHRI, SK ;
LIAKAKOS, TA ;
PATHI, V ;
TOWNSEND, ER ;
FOUNTAIN, SW .
ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 1993, 55 (03) :603-606