Randomized comparative trial of mizoribine versus mycophenolate mofetil in combination with tacrolimus for living donor renal transplantation

被引:24
|
作者
Takahara, Shiro [1 ]
Takahashi, Kota [2 ]
Akiyama, Takahiro [3 ]
Uchida, Kazuharu [4 ]
Tanabe, Kazunari [5 ]
Amada, Noritoshi [6 ]
Toma, Hiroshi [5 ]
机构
[1] Osaka Univ, Dept Adv Technol Transplantat, Suita, Osaka 5650871, Japan
[2] Niigata Univ, Dept Urol, Niigata, Japan
[3] Sakai Onshinkai Hosp, Sakai, Osaka, Japan
[4] Nagoya Daini Red Cross Hosp, Dept Surg, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan
[5] Tokyo Womens Med Univ, Dept Urol, Shinjuku Ku, Tokyo, Japan
[6] Sendai Shakaihoken Hosp, Dept Surg, Sendai, Miyagi, Japan
关键词
Renal transplantation; Tacrolimus; Mycophenolate mofetil; Mizoribine; Randomized comparative study; BREDININ;
D O I
10.1007/s10157-013-0780-1
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Mizoribine (MZR) was approved in 1984 in Japan for the suppression of rejection in renal transplantation with an approved administration dosage of 1-3 mg/kg/day. The action of MZR resembles that of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), but MZR dosing is markedly lower than that of MMF. To examine whether higher dosing of MZR could obtain efficacy similar to MMF in renal transplantation, we conducted a comparative study of MZR and MMF using a high daily dose of MZR. A prospective, randomized comparative study of MZR versus MMF using tacrolimus (FK) and steroids as the base was conducted in 35 patients who had undergone living-donor renal transplantation (ABO-incompatible patients were not included) at 8 institutions in Japan between July 2005 and June 2007. Starting doses were 12 mg/kg/day for MZR and 2 g/day for MMF. Dosages of FK and steroids were set according to the protocol of each institution. Patient and graft survival rate at 1 year after transplantation was 100 % in each group, with no significant difference in rejection rate apparent between groups. Adverse events found in both groups were characteristic, frequently involving infection and digestive organ disorder in the MMF group and elevated uric acid levels in the MZR group. Based on these results, MZR and MMF are considered almost equivalent in terms of efficacy and safety.
引用
收藏
页码:899 / 904
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A prospective, randomized trial of tacrolimus in combination with sirolimus or mycophenolate mofetil in kidney transplantation: Results at 1 year
    Mendez, R
    Gonwa, T
    Yang, HC
    Weinstein, S
    Jensik, S
    Steinberg, S
    TRANSPLANTATION, 2005, 80 (03) : 303 - 309
  • [22] Comparison of Mizoribine and Mycophenolate Mofetil With a Tacrolimus-Based Immunosuppressive Regimen in Living-Donor Kidney Transplantation Recipients: A Retrospective Study in China
    Shi, Y.
    Liu, H.
    Chen, X. -G.
    Shen, Z. -Y.
    TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2017, 49 (01) : 26 - 31
  • [23] Steroid sparing with tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil in renal transplantation
    Borrows, R
    Loucaidou, M
    Van Tromp, J
    Cairns, T
    Griffith, M
    Hakim, N
    McLean, A
    Palmer, A
    Papalois, V
    Taube, D
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2004, 4 (11) : 1845 - 1851
  • [24] A Randomized Trial With Steroids and Antithymocyte Globulins Comparing Cyclosporine/Azathioprine Versus Tacrolimus/Mycophenolate Mofetil (CATM2) in Renal Transplantation
    Vacher-Coponat, Henri
    Moal, Valerie
    Indreies, Monica
    Purgus, Raj
    Loundou, Anderson
    Burtey, Stephane
    Brunet, Philippe
    Moussi-Frances, Julie
    Daniel, Laurent
    Dussol, Bertrand
    Berland, Yvon
    TRANSPLANTATION, 2012, 93 (04) : 437 - 443
  • [25] Tacrolimus (FK506) and mycophenolate mofetil combination therapy versus tacrolimus in adult liver transplantation
    Eckhoff, DE
    McGuire, BM
    Frenette, LR
    Contreras, JL
    Hudson, SL
    Bynon, JS
    TRANSPLANTATION, 1998, 65 (02) : 180 - 187
  • [26] Graft survival following living-donor renal transplantation: A comparison of tacrolimus and cyclosporine microemulsion with mycophenolate mofetil and steroids
    Bunnapradist, S
    Daswani, A
    Takemoto, SK
    TRANSPLANTATION, 2003, 76 (01) : 10 - 15
  • [27] Randomized Trial of Mycophenolate Mofetil Versus Enteric-Coated Mycophenolate Sodium in Primary Renal Transplantation With Tacrolimus and Steroid Avoidance: Four-Year Analysis
    Ciancio, Gaetano
    Gaynor, Jeffrey J.
    Zarak, Alberto
    Sageshima, Junichiro
    Guerra, Giselle
    Roth, David
    Brown, Randolph
    Kupin, Warren
    Chen, Linda
    Tueros, Lissett
    Hanson, Lois
    Ruiz, Phillip
    Burke, George W., III
    TRANSPLANTATION, 2011, 91 (11) : 1198 - 1205
  • [28] Randomized, multicenter trial comparing tacrolimus plus mycophenolate mofetil to tacrolimus plus steroids in hepatitis C virus-positive recipients of living donor liver transplantation
    Takada, Yasutsugu
    Kaido, Toshimi
    Asonuma, Katsuhiro
    Sakurai, Hiroyuki
    Kubo, Shoji
    Kiuchi, Tetsuya
    Inomata, Yukihiro
    Isaji, Shuji
    Tsumura, Hayami
    Teramukai, Satoshi
    Matsubara, Yoshihiro
    Sakabayashi, Satomi
    Uemoto, Shinji
    LIVER TRANSPLANTATION, 2013, 19 (08) : 896 - 906
  • [29] Azathioprine Versus Mycophenolate Mofetil in Combination with Tacrolimus and Steroids Maintenance in Pediatric Kidney Transplantation
    Al-Mowaina, Sahar
    TRANSPLANTATION, 2018, 102 : S839 - S839
  • [30] Mycophenolate mofetil and sirolimus combination in renal transplantation
    Grinyo, J. M.
    Cruzado, J. M.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2006, 6 (09) : 1991 - 1999