Randomized comparative trial of mizoribine versus mycophenolate mofetil in combination with tacrolimus for living donor renal transplantation

被引:24
|
作者
Takahara, Shiro [1 ]
Takahashi, Kota [2 ]
Akiyama, Takahiro [3 ]
Uchida, Kazuharu [4 ]
Tanabe, Kazunari [5 ]
Amada, Noritoshi [6 ]
Toma, Hiroshi [5 ]
机构
[1] Osaka Univ, Dept Adv Technol Transplantat, Suita, Osaka 5650871, Japan
[2] Niigata Univ, Dept Urol, Niigata, Japan
[3] Sakai Onshinkai Hosp, Sakai, Osaka, Japan
[4] Nagoya Daini Red Cross Hosp, Dept Surg, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan
[5] Tokyo Womens Med Univ, Dept Urol, Shinjuku Ku, Tokyo, Japan
[6] Sendai Shakaihoken Hosp, Dept Surg, Sendai, Miyagi, Japan
关键词
Renal transplantation; Tacrolimus; Mycophenolate mofetil; Mizoribine; Randomized comparative study; BREDININ;
D O I
10.1007/s10157-013-0780-1
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Mizoribine (MZR) was approved in 1984 in Japan for the suppression of rejection in renal transplantation with an approved administration dosage of 1-3 mg/kg/day. The action of MZR resembles that of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), but MZR dosing is markedly lower than that of MMF. To examine whether higher dosing of MZR could obtain efficacy similar to MMF in renal transplantation, we conducted a comparative study of MZR and MMF using a high daily dose of MZR. A prospective, randomized comparative study of MZR versus MMF using tacrolimus (FK) and steroids as the base was conducted in 35 patients who had undergone living-donor renal transplantation (ABO-incompatible patients were not included) at 8 institutions in Japan between July 2005 and June 2007. Starting doses were 12 mg/kg/day for MZR and 2 g/day for MMF. Dosages of FK and steroids were set according to the protocol of each institution. Patient and graft survival rate at 1 year after transplantation was 100 % in each group, with no significant difference in rejection rate apparent between groups. Adverse events found in both groups were characteristic, frequently involving infection and digestive organ disorder in the MMF group and elevated uric acid levels in the MZR group. Based on these results, MZR and MMF are considered almost equivalent in terms of efficacy and safety.
引用
收藏
页码:899 / 904
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Randomized Trial Comparing Tacrolimus and Steroid with Tacrolimus and Mycophenolate Mofetil among HCV-Positive Recipients of Living Donor Liver Transplantation
    Takada, Yasutsugu
    Kaido, Toshimi
    Asonuma, Katsuhiro
    Sakurai, Hiroyuki
    Kubo, Shoji
    Kiuchi, Tetsuya
    Inomata, Yukihiro
    Isaji, Shuji
    Uemoto, Shinji
    LIVER TRANSPLANTATION, 2012, 18 : S227 - S227
  • [12] A randomized, prospective, comparative trial of tacrolimus-mycophenolate mofetil and neoral-mycophenolate mofetil in kidney transplantation.
    Ahsan, N
    Holman, MJ
    Ulsh, PJ
    Langhoff, EG
    Yang, HC
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF NEPHROLOGY, 1997, 8 : A3130 - A3130
  • [13] Mizoribine in combination therapy with tacrolimus for living donor renal transplantation: analysis of a nationwide study in Japan
    Akiyama, T
    Okazaki, H
    Takahashi, K
    Hasegawa, A
    Tanabe, K
    Uchida, K
    Takahara, S
    Toma, H
    TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2005, 37 (02) : 843 - 845
  • [14] A prospective, randomized trial of tacrolimus/prednisone versus tacrolimus/prednisone mycophenolate mofetil in renal transplant recipients
    Shapiro, R
    Jordan, ML
    Scantlebury, VP
    Vivas, C
    Marsh, JM
    McCauley, J
    Johnston, J
    Randhawa, P
    Irish, W
    Gritsch, HA
    Naraghi, R
    Hakala, TR
    Fung, JJ
    Starzl, TE
    TRANSPLANTATION, 1999, 67 (03) : 411 - 415
  • [15] Randomized trial of tacrolimus (Prograf) in combination with azathioprine or mychophenolate mofetil versus cyclosporine (Neoral) with mycophenolate mofetil after cadaveric kidney transplantation
    Johnson, C
    Ahsan, N
    Gonwa, T
    Halloran, P
    Stegall, M
    Hardy, M
    Metzger, R
    Shield, C
    Rocher, L
    Scandling, J
    Sorensen, J
    Mulloy, L
    Light, J
    Corwin, C
    Danovitch, G
    Wachs, M
    VanVeldhuisen, P
    Salm, K
    Tolzman, D
    Fitzsimmons, WE
    TRANSPLANTATION, 2000, 69 (05) : 834 - 841
  • [16] Tacrolimus versus Cyclosporine in Combination with Mycophenolate Mofetil after Heart Transplantation - Ten Year Results of a Prospective Randomized Trial
    Guethoff, S.
    Meiser, B.
    Ueberfuhr, P.
    Eifert, S.
    Reichart, B.
    JOURNAL OF HEART AND LUNG TRANSPLANTATION, 2011, 30 (04): : S54 - S55
  • [17] Randomized trial of tacrolimus in combination with sirolimus or mycophenolate mofetil in kidney transplantation: Results at 6 months
    Gonwa, T
    Mendez, R
    Yang, HC
    Weinstein, S
    Jensik, S
    Steinberg, S
    TRANSPLANTATION, 2003, 75 (08) : 1213 - 1220
  • [18] Mycophenolate mofetil in combination with tacrolimus versus neoral after liver transplantation
    Klupp, J
    Glanemann, M
    Bechstein, WO
    Platz, KP
    Langrehr, JM
    Keck, H
    Settmacher, U
    Radtke, C
    Neuhaus, R
    Neuhaus, P
    TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 1999, 31 (1-2) : 1113 - 1114
  • [19] Comparative trial of Prograf (tacrolimus) in combination with azathioprine or mycophenolate mofetil vs. neoral (cyclosporine) with mycophenolate mofetil after kidney transplantation
    Gonwa, T
    Ahsan, N
    Halloran, P
    Stegall, M
    Hardy, M
    Metzger, R
    Shield, C
    Rocher, L
    Scandling, J
    Sorense, J
    Mulloy, L
    Light, J
    Corwin, C
    Danovitch, G
    Wachs, M
    Van Veldhuisen, P
    Salm, K
    Tolzman, D
    Fitzsimmons, W
    TRANSPLANTATION, 1999, 67 (07) : S239 - S239
  • [20] Ten-Year Results of a Randomized Trial Comparing Tacrolimus Versus Cyclosporine A in Combination With Mycophenolate Mofetil After Heart Transplantation
    Guethoff, Sonja
    Meiser, Bruno M.
    Groetzner, Jan
    Eifert, Sandra
    Grinninger, Carola
    Ueberfuhr, Peter
    Reichart, Bruno
    Hagl, Christian
    Kaczmarek, Ingo
    TRANSPLANTATION, 2013, 95 (04) : 629 - 634