Assessing and Mapping Reading and Writing Motivation in Third to Eight Graders: A Self-Determination Theory Perspective

被引:23
作者
De Smedt, Fien [1 ]
Rogiers, Amelie [1 ,2 ]
Heirweg, Sofie [3 ]
Merchie, Emmelien [1 ]
Van Keer, Hilde [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ghent, Dept Educ Studies, Ghent, Belgium
[2] VIVES Univ Appl Sci, Social Innovat Expertise Ctr, Kortrijk, Belgium
[3] Howest Univ Appl Sci, Presch & Primary Educ, Brugge, Belgium
来源
FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY | 2020年 / 11卷
关键词
reading motivation; writing motivation; self-determination theory; elementary education; secondary education; COVARIANCE STRUCTURE-ANALYSIS; BASIC PSYCHOLOGICAL NEEDS; INTRINSIC MOTIVATION; ACADEMIC MOTIVATION; THEORETICAL-MODELS; FIT INDEXES; ACHIEVEMENT; ADOLESCENCE; PREDICTORS; LANGUAGE;
D O I
10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01678
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The twofold aim of this study was to substantiate the validity of the Self-Regulation Questionnaire-Reading Motivation and Self-Regulation Questionnaire-Writing Motivation for third to eight graders and to map motivational trends in elementary and secondary education students' academic and recreational reading and writing. More specifically, we adopted the innovative and coherent theoretical framework of the Self-Determination Theory to study qualitatively different motives for reading and writing and to examine the relationships between them. In total, 2,343 students from third to eighth grade were involved. Based on confirmatory factor analyses, a two-factor model, distinguishing between autonomous and controlled motivation, for academic and recreational reading and writing was confirmed in all grades. Furthermore, the scales were reliable, and the measurement models were invariant across students' gender and their general achievement level. Despite the absence of strong invariance for the measurement models across each of the different grades, we found evidence that students within the same grade level (i.e., middle elementary, upper elementary, and lower secondary grade) interpreted the SRQ-Reading and Writing scale items in a conceptually similar way. Factor correlations confirmed the interrelatedness of reading and writing motives, as well as strong associations between students' motivation to read and write in either academic and recreational contexts. Finally, concerning the motivational trends, the present results advert to a significant decline of students' autonomous motivation to read and write, both in and outside school. Accordingly, we point out that the late elementary and the lower secondary grades are crucial phases to engage students in motivating literacy activities. In light of these alarming results, we recommend future experimental research studies to focus on evaluating the effectiveness of instructional reading and writing activities that foster students' innate need for autonomy, competence, and relatedness.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 78 条
[1]   Longitudinal Relationships of Levels of Language in Writing and Between Writing and Reading in Grades 1 to 7 [J].
Abbott, Robert D. ;
Berninger, Virginia W. ;
Fayol, Michel .
JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2010, 102 (02) :281-298
[2]   Students' Objectively Measured Physical Activity Levels and Engagement as a Function of Between-Class and Between-Student Differences in Motivation Toward Physical Education [J].
Aelterman, Nathalie ;
Vansteenkiste, Maarten ;
Van Keer, Hilde ;
Van den Berghe, Lynn ;
De Meyer, Jotie ;
Haerens, Leen .
JOURNAL OF SPORT & EXERCISE PSYCHOLOGY, 2012, 34 (04) :457-480
[3]   Developmental Relations Between Reading and Writing at the Word, Sentence, and Text Levels: A Latent Change Score Analysis [J].
Ahmed, Yusra ;
Wagner, Richard K. ;
Lopez, Danielle .
JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2014, 106 (02) :419-434
[4]   CLASSROOMS - GOALS, STRUCTURES, AND STUDENT MOTIVATION [J].
AMES, C .
JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1992, 84 (03) :261-271
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2020, USERS GUIDE MLWIN V3
[6]   SELF-EFFICACY - TOWARD A UNIFYING THEORY OF BEHAVIORAL CHANGE [J].
BANDURA, A .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1977, 84 (02) :191-215
[7]  
Bandura A., 1997, Self-efficacy: The exercise of control
[8]   Intrinsic and Extrinsic Reading Motivation as Predictors of Reading Literacy A Longitudinal Study [J].
Becker, Michael ;
McElvany, Nele ;
Kortenbruck, Marthe .
JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2010, 102 (04) :773-785
[9]   Alpha, Dimension-Free, and Model-Based Internal Consistency Reliability [J].
Bentler, Peter M. .
PSYCHOMETRIKA, 2009, 74 (01) :137-143
[10]   Writing and reading: Connections between language by hand and language by eye [J].
Berninger, VW ;
Abbott, RD ;
Abbott, SP ;
Graham, S ;
Richards, T .
JOURNAL OF LEARNING DISABILITIES, 2002, 35 (01) :39-56