Review in life cycle assessment of biomass conversion through pyrolysis-issues and recommendations

被引:32
作者
Yu, Zhaozhuo [1 ]
Ma, Haoxiang [2 ]
Liu, Xiangjun [1 ]
Wang, Miao [1 ]
Wang, Junqi [1 ]
机构
[1] Xi An Jiao Tong Univ, Sch Human Settlements & Civil Engn, Xian 710049, Peoples R China
[2] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Deep Sea Sci & Engn, Deep Sea Engn Div, Sanya 572000, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Life cycle assessment; Pyrolysis; Global warming potential; Agricultural residues; Forest residues; Microalgae; BIOFUEL PRODUCTION; BIOCHAR SYSTEMS; THERMOCHEMICAL CONVERSION; MICROALGAE BIOMASS; DIESEL PRODUCTION; ENERGY; LCA; TECHNOLOGIES; CONSEQUENCES; OPTIMIZATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.gce.2022.08.002
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
Biomass, widespread and carbon-neutral energy, can provide electric energy and replace fossil fuel-derived production. Pyrolysis is the main way of converting biomass to different bioenergy products with the consumption of material and energy, which will cause environmental impacts. To confirm the actual environmental impact of biomass conversion, life cycle assessment (LCA) is used for analyzing the process. Due to choosing different LCA methods, the results for the same thing in different reports will show obvious fluctuation. This review is devoted to providing recommendations on how to handle methodological issues when analyzing LCA study, by which researchers can better realize the similarities and differences in biomass conversion system. In this review, multiple clarifications and methodological recommendations on the four steps of the LCA process (including goal and scope definition, life cycle inventory, life cycle impact assessment, and interpretation) are provided. Furthermore, the LCA results are discussed systematically, in which the global warming potential gets extra attention. Meanwhile, different biomass feedstocks are divided into agricultural residues, forest residues, and microalgae carefully. Finally, the current challenges and future framework of biomass conversion are expounded in detail from the perspective of LCA.
引用
收藏
页码:304 / 312
页数:9
相关论文
共 82 条
[1]   Environmental sustainability of small-scale biomass power technologies for agricultural communities in developing countries [J].
Aberilla, Jhud Mikhail ;
Gallego-Schmid, Alejandro ;
Azapagic, Adisa .
RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2019, 141 :493-506
[2]  
Adeniyi AG, 2021, BIOFUELS-UK, V12, P879, DOI [10.1080/17597269.2018.1554949, 10.1080/17597269.2019.1613751]
[3]   Review of methodological choices in LCA of biorefinery systems - key issues and recommendations [J].
Ahlgren, Serina ;
Bjorklund, Anna ;
Ekman, Anna ;
Karlsson, Hanna ;
Berlin, Johanna ;
Borjesson, Pal ;
Ekvall, Tomas ;
Finnveden, Goran ;
Janssen, Matty ;
Strid, Ingrid .
BIOFUELS BIOPRODUCTS & BIOREFINING-BIOFPR, 2015, 9 (05) :606-619
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2014, 14046 ISO
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2006, ENV MAN LIF CYCL ASS
[6]   Economic Allocation in Life Cycle Assessment The State of the Art and Discussion of Examples [J].
Ardente, Fulvio ;
Cellura, Maurizio .
JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ECOLOGY, 2012, 16 (03) :387-398
[7]   Lifecycle assessment of microalgae to biofuel: Comparison of thermochemical processing pathways [J].
Bennion, Edward P. ;
Ginosar, Daniel M. ;
Moses, John ;
Agblevor, Foster ;
Quinn, Jason C. .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2015, 154 :1062-1071
[8]   Survey of approaches to improve reliability in LCA [J].
Björklund, AE .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2002, 7 (02) :64-72
[9]  
Brassard P., 2016, CSBE SCGAB 2016 ANN
[10]   Greater future global warming inferred from Earth's recent energy budget [J].
Brown, Patrick T. ;
Caldeira, Ken .
NATURE, 2017, 552 (7683) :45-+