Proton Pump Inhibitors vs. Histamine 2 Receptor Antagonists for Stress-Related Mucosal Bleeding Prophylaxis in Critically III Patients: A Meta-Analysis

被引:109
|
作者
Barkun, Alan N. [1 ,2 ]
Bardou, Marc [3 ,4 ]
Pham, C. Q. D. [5 ,6 ]
Martel, Myriam [1 ]
机构
[1] McGill Univ, McGill Univ Hlth Ctr, Div Gastroenterol, Montreal, PQ H3G 1A4, Canada
[2] McGill Univ, McGill Univ Hlth Ctr, Div Clin Epidemiol, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[3] CHU Dijon, INSERM CIC P 803, Dijon, France
[4] Univ Bourgogne, Dijon, France
[5] Univ Montreal, Fac Pharm, Montreal, PQ H3C 3J7, Canada
[6] Govt Canada, Hlth Canada, Ottawa, ON, Canada
来源
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY | 2012年 / 107卷 / 04期
关键词
INTENSIVE-CARE-UNIT; ILL PATIENTS; ULCER PROPHYLAXIS; INTRAVENOUS PANTOPRAZOLE; RISK-FACTORS; GASTRIC PH; OMEPRAZOLE; INFUSION; THERAPY; TRIALS;
D O I
10.1038/ajg.2011.474
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
OBJECTIVES: H2-receptor antagonists (H2RA) have been shown to reduce stress-related mucosal bleeding (SRMB), yet randomized controlled trials assessing proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) have yielded conflicting results. The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of PPIs vs. H2RAs in the prophylaxis of SRMB in critically ill adults with risk factors for bleeding. METHODS: Tailored literature searches of the past four decades were conducted. Outcomes measured were the decreases in rates of clinically significant bleeding (B, primary outcome of the meta-analysis), nosocomial pneumonia (P), and mortality (M) (secondary outcomes). Study heterogeneity was sought and quantified. Results are reported as odd ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: Eight fully published randomized controlled trials and five abstracts met the inclusion criteria. Prophylactic PPI administration significantly decreased the incidence of bleeding (N = 1,587 patients, OR = 0.30; 95 % CI: 0.17-0.54), number needed to treat = 39; 95% CI: 21-303 with no observed statistical heterogeneity among the relevant comparisons (P = 0.93, (sic) = 0.0 %). No statistical differences were noted for the development of nosocomial pneumonia (n = 7, N = 1,017 patients, OR = 1.05; 95% CI: 0.69-1.62) or mortality (n = 8, N = 1,260 patients, OR = 1.19; 95% CI: 0.84-1.68) or (and no heterogeneity was found for either: P = 0.85, (sic) = 0.0 %, and P = 0.96, (sic) = 0 %, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: In critically ill patients at risk for the development of SRMB, PPI prophylaxis significantly decreased rates of clinically significant bleeding compared with H2RA, without affecting the development of nosocomial pneumonia or mortality rates. The magnitude of the beneficial effect, and its clinical relevance, now requires further characterization using cost-effectiveness analysis considering the incidence of stress-related mucosal disease-related bleeding.
引用
收藏
页码:507 / 520
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Proton pump inhibitors vs. histamine 2 receptor antagonists for stress related mucosal bleeding prophylaxis in critically ill patients: a meta-analysis
    Bardou, M.
    Pham, C. Q.
    Barkun, A. N.
    Martel, M.
    Welage, L. S.
    FUNDAMENTAL & CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2007, 21 : 34 - 34
  • [2] PROTON PUMP INHIBITORS VERSUS HISTAMINE 2 RECEPTOR ANTAGONISTS FOR STRESS RELATED MUCOSAL BLEEDING PROPHYLAXIS IN CRITICALLY ILL PATIENTS: A META-ANALYSIS
    Pham, C. Q. D.
    Barkun, A. N.
    Bardou, M.
    Martel, M.
    Welage, L. S.
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL PHARMACY, 2008, 61 : 59 - 59
  • [3] Proton pump inhibitors versus histamine 2 receptor antagonists or sucralfate for stress related mucosal bleeding prophylaxis in critically ill patients: A follow-up meta-analysis
    Pham, Co Q.
    Barkun, Alan
    Bardou, Marc
    Martel, Myriam
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2008, 134 (04) : A731 - A731
  • [4] Proton Pump Inhibitors Versus Histamine 2 Receptor Antagonists for Stress Ulcer Prophylaxis in Critically III Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Alhazzani, Waleed
    Alenezi, Farhan
    Jaeschke, Roman Z.
    Moayyedi, Paul
    Cook, Deborah J.
    CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2013, 41 (03) : 693 - 705
  • [5] Interventions for Stress Ulcer Prophylaxis (SUP) - Proton Pump Inhibitors vs Histamine 2 Receptor Antagonists: An Updated Meta-Analysis
    Deliwala, Smit
    Hamid, Kewan
    Malladi, Srikanth
    Lakshman, Harini
    Jones, Shane
    Leon, Brianna
    Minh Thu An
    Santana, Maria
    Bachuwa, Ghassan
    Chawla, Saurabh
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2020, 115 : S303 - S304
  • [6] The efficacy and safety of proton pump inhibitors vs histamine-2 receptor antagonists for stress ulcer bleeding prophylaxis among critical care patients: A meta-analysis
    Lin, Pei-Chin
    Chang, Chia-Hsuin
    Hsu, Ping-I
    Tseng, Pi-Lai
    Huang, Yaw-Bin
    CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2010, 38 (04) : 1197 - 1205
  • [7] Proton Pump Inhibitors Versus Histamine-2-Receptor Antagonists for Stress Ulcer Prophylaxis in Critically Ill Patients A Meta-analysis and Trial Sequential Analysis
    Deliwala, Smit S.
    Hamid, Kewan
    Goyal, Hemant
    Ponnapalli, Anoosha
    Zayed, Yazan
    Bala, Areeg
    Lakshman, Harini
    Malladi, Shrikanth
    Jones, Shane
    Santana, Maria
    Leon, Brianna
    An, Minh T.
    Chawla, Saurabh
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2022, 56 (03) : 204 - 217
  • [8] Stress ulcer prophylaxis with proton pump inhibitors or histamine 2 receptor antagonists in critically ill adults - a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials with trial sequential analysis
    Xiaoyang Zhou
    Hanyuan Fang
    Jianfei Xu
    Peifu Chen
    Xujun Hu
    Bixin Chen
    Hua Wang
    Caibao Hu
    Zhaojun Xu
    BMC Gastroenterology, 19
  • [9] Proton pump inhibitors for stress ulcer prophylaxis in critically Ill patients: A meta-analysis
    Pham, Co Q. d.
    Barkun, Alan N.
    Bardou, Marc
    Martel, Myriam
    Welage, Lynda S.
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2007, 132 (04) : A497 - A497
  • [10] Prevention of stress-related mucosal bleeding with proton-pump inhibitors
    Maton, PN
    ALIMENTARY PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 2005, 22 : 45 - 52