Individual- and trial-level surrogacy in colorectal cancer

被引:62
作者
Buyse, Marc [1 ,2 ]
Burzykowski, Tomasz [2 ]
Michiels, Stefan [3 ]
Carroll, Kevin [4 ]
机构
[1] IDDI, Louvain, Belgium
[2] Hasselt Univ, Ctr Stat, Diepenbeek, Belgium
[3] Inst Gustave Roussy, Biostat & Epidemiol Unit, Villejuif, France
[4] Astra Zeneca Res & Dev, Oncol Therapy Area, Macclesfield, Cheshire, England
关键词
D O I
10.1177/0962280207081864
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Two conditions must be fulfilled for an intermediate endpoint to be an acceptable surrogate for a true clinical endpoint: (1) there must be a strong association between the surrogate and the true endpoint, and (2) there must be a strong association between the effects of treatment on the surrogate and the true endpoint. We rest whether these conditions are fulfilled for disease-free survival (DFS) and progression-free Survival (PFS) on data from 20 clinical trials comparing experimental treatments with standard treatments for early and advanced colorectal cancer. The effects of treatment on DFS jot ITS in advanced disease) and OS were quantified through log hazard ratios (log HR), estimated through a Weibull model stratified for trial. The rank correlation coefficients between DFS and OS, and trial-specific treatment effects, were estimated using a bivariate copula distribution for these endpoints. A linear regression model between the estimated log hazard ratios was used to compute the "surrogate threshold effect", which is the minimum treatment effect on IFS required to predict a non-zero treatment effect on OS in a future trial. In early disease, the rank correlation coefficient between DFS and OS was equal to 0.96, (CI 0.95-0.97). The correlation coefficient between the log hazard ratios was equal to 0.94 (CI 0.87-1.01). The risk reductions were approximately 3% smaller on OS than on DFS, and the surrogate threshold effect corresponded to a DFS hazard ratio of 0.93. In advanced disease, the rank correlation coefficient between PFS and OS was equal to 0.82 (CI 0.82-0.83). The correlation coefficient between the log hazard ratios was equal to 0.99 (CI 0.94-1.04). The risk reductions were approximately, 19%, smaller on OS than on ITS, and the surrogate threshold effect corresponded to a PFS hazard ratio of 0.86. One trial with a large treatment effect on PFS and OS had a strong influence on the results in advanced disease. DFS (and PFS in advanced disease) are acceptable surrogates for OS in colorectal cancer.
引用
收藏
页码:467 / 475
页数:9
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1987, ROBUST REGRESSION OU
[2]   Validation of surrogate end points in multiple randomized clinical trials with failure time end points [J].
Burzykowski, T ;
Molenberghs, G .
JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES C-APPLIED STATISTICS, 2001, 50 :405-422
[3]  
Burzykowski T., 2005, EVALUATION SURROGATE
[4]   Surrogate endpoints: wishful thinking or reality? [J].
Burzykowski, Tomasz .
STATISTICAL METHODS IN MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2008, 17 (05) :463-466
[5]   Surrogate threshold effect: An alternative measure for meta-analytic surrogate endpoint validation [J].
Burzykowski, Tomasz ;
Buyse, Marc .
PHARMACEUTICAL STATISTICS, 2006, 5 (03) :173-186
[6]   Relation between tumour response to first-line chemotherapy and survival in advanced colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis [J].
Buyse, M ;
Thirion, P ;
Carlson, RW ;
Burzykowski, T ;
Molenberghs, G ;
Piedbois, P .
LANCET, 2000, 356 (9227) :373-378
[7]   Criteria for the validation of surrogate endpoints in randomized experiments [J].
Buyse, M ;
Molenberghs, G .
BIOMETRICS, 1998, 54 (03) :1014-1029
[8]  
Buyse M, 2000, Biostatistics, V1, P49, DOI 10.1093/biostatistics/1.1.49
[9]   Progression-free survival is a surrogate for survival in advanced colorectal cancer [J].
Buyse, Marc ;
Burzykowski, Tomasz ;
Carroll, Kevin ;
Michiels, Stefan ;
Sargent, Daniel J. ;
Miller, Langdon L. ;
Elfring, Gary L. ;
Pignon, Jean-Pierre ;
Piedbois, Pascal .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2007, 25 (33) :5218-5224
[10]  
COX DR, 1972, J R STAT SOC B, V34, P187