Reinventing marine spatial planning: a critical review of initiatives worldwide

被引:37
作者
Trouillet, Brice [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nantes, CNRS, UMR LETG, Chemin Censive Tertre,BP 81227, F-44000 Nantes, France
关键词
Marine spatial planning; spatial planning; strategic planning; zoning; critical review; GREAT-BARRIER-REEF; DANGEROUS TARGETS; PROTECTED AREAS; SEA; MANAGEMENT; POLICY; LAND; PERSPECTIVES; GOVERNANCE; CHALLENGES;
D O I
10.1080/1523908X.2020.1751605
中图分类号
F0 [经济学]; F1 [世界各国经济概况、经济史、经济地理]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
0201 ; 020105 ; 03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
Although marine spatial planning (MSP) is increasingly being applied worldwide, it appears to be based on an ambiguity that has arisen from its dichotomous role of ensuring both conservation and development. This elusive ideal hints at a possible discrepancy between theory and practice. This paper explores the hypothesis that beyond a performative narrative, MSP is actually better described as a variety of devices which fulfil other roles and converge in terms of planning type. To test this hypothesis, this paper analyses the content of past and present MSP initiatives from around the world. The findings show that these initiatives view MSP either as a strategic sectoral spatial planning tool or strategic planning tool, brought in to complement existing initiatives. Furthermore, these two approaches can actually be seen to converge in the type of planning used, through the role attributed to spatial aspects, and more specifically in the place given to zoning. There are two key implications of these findings: the need to open up theoretical debates more broadly to different disciplinary perspectives on MSP; and the need for crucial choices to be made to ensure that MSP does not become an illusion behind which other agendas lie.
引用
收藏
页码:441 / 459
页数:19
相关论文
共 87 条
  • [1] Dangerous targets? Unresolved issues and ideological clashes around marine protected areas
    Agardy, T
    Bridgewater, P
    Crosby, MP
    Day, J
    Dayton, PK
    Kenchington, R
    Laffoley, D
    McConney, P
    Murray, PA
    Parks, JE
    Peau, L
    [J]. AQUATIC CONSERVATION-MARINE AND FRESHWATER ECOSYSTEMS, 2003, 13 (04) : 353 - 367
  • [2] Agardy's Final Word Reply
    Agardy, Tundi
    [J]. ICES JOURNAL OF MARINE SCIENCE, 2018, 75 (03) : 1187 - 1187
  • [3] 'Dangerous Targets' revisited: Old dangers in new contexts plague marine protected areas
    Agardy, Tundi
    Claudet, Joachim
    Day, Jon C.
    [J]. AQUATIC CONSERVATION-MARINE AND FRESHWATER ECOSYSTEMS, 2016, 26 : 7 - 23
  • [4] Strategic (spatial) planning reexamined
    Albrechts, L
    [J]. ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING B-PLANNING & DESIGN, 2004, 31 (05) : 743 - 758
  • [5] Strategic spatial planning and regional governance in Europe
    Albrechts, L
    Healey, P
    Kunzmann, KR
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION, 2003, 69 (02) : 113 - 129
  • [6] Post-political spatial planning in England: a crisis of consensus?
    Allmendinger, Phil
    Haughton, Graham
    [J]. TRANSACTIONS OF THE INSTITUTE OF BRITISH GEOGRAPHERS, 2012, 37 (01) : 89 - 103
  • [7] [Anonymous], 2019, PISA 2018 RESULTS VO, VII, DOI [DOI 10.1787/9789264251724-EN, 10.1787/b5fd1b8f-en, DOI 10.1787/B5FD1B8F-EN]
  • [8] Beck M.W., 2009, Best Practices for Marine Spatial Planning
  • [9] Ocean data portals: Performing a new infrastructure for ocean governance
    Boucquey, Noelle
    St Martin, Kevin
    Fairbanks, Luke
    Campbell, Lisa M.
    Wise, Sarah
    [J]. ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING D-SOCIETY & SPACE, 2019, 37 (03) : 484 - 503
  • [10] The ontological politics of marine spatial planning: Assembling the ocean and shaping the capacities of 'Community' and 'Environment'
    Boucquey, Noelle
    Fairbanks, Luke
    St Martin, Kevin
    Campbell, Lisa M.
    McCay, Bonnie
    [J]. GEOFORUM, 2016, 75 : 1 - 11