CONSTRUCT VALIDITY OF THE DSM-5 SECTION III MALADAPTIVE TRAIT DOMAINS IN OLDER ADULTS

被引:25
作者
Debast, Inge [1 ]
Rossi, Gina [1 ]
van Alphen, S. P. J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Vrije Univ Brussel, Dept Clin & Lifespan Psychol, Pleinlaan 2, B-1050 Brussels, Belgium
关键词
BORDERLINE PERSONALITY-DISORDER; COMMUNITY SAMPLE; AGE-NEUTRALITY; CRITERIA; INVENTORY; DIAGNOSIS; INDEXES; ISSUES; MODEL; PID-5;
D O I
10.1521/pedi_2017_31_274
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
The DSM-5 Section III model of personality disorders remains largely unexplored in older adults. More specifically, there is a need for further research on the generalizability of the five trait domains in old age. The development of a short operationalization to screen for maladaptive trait domains, the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 Brief Form (PID-5-BF), can stimulate the use of the alternative DSM-5 model in older adults by addressing the need for short instruments. The primary goal of this study was to examine the construct validity of the PID-5-BF by comparing its structural model and nomological network with the original PID-5 in terms of relations with domains of personality functioning and a gero-specific personality disorder indicator. A five-factor model was supported, but the domain Disinhibition was not replicated in the original PID-5, and some PID-5-BF items showed weak loadings. Nevertheless, the nomological network was similar and showed meaningful relations, supporting the use of the Brief PID-5 in older clinical samples.
引用
收藏
页码:671 / 688
页数:18
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]  
American Psychiatric Association, 2013, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders: DSM-5, V5th ed, DOI 10.1176/appi.books.9780890425596
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2010, Mplus user's guide
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2014, [DSM-5 Personality Inventory. Dutch translation of The PersonalityInventory for DSM-5® (PID-5)-Adult, 2011(American Psychiatric Association)]
[4]   The Alternative DSM-5 Personality Disorder Traits Criterion: A Comparative Examination of Three Self-Report Forms in a Danish Population [J].
Bach, Bo ;
Maples-Keller, Jessica L. ;
Bo, Sune ;
Simonsen, Erik .
PERSONALITY DISORDERS-THEORY RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2016, 7 (02) :124-135
[5]   An item response theory analysis of DSM-IV personality disorder criteria across younger and older age groups [J].
Balsis, Steve ;
Gleason, Marci E. J. ;
Woods, Carol M. ;
Oltmanns, Thomas F. .
PSYCHOLOGY AND AGING, 2007, 22 (01) :171-185
[6]   Revising the Personality Disorder Diagnostic Criteria for the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-Fifth Edition (DSM-V): Consider the Later Life Context [J].
Balsis, Steve ;
Segal, Daniel L. ;
Donahue, Cailin .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHOPSYCHIATRY, 2009, 79 (04) :452-460
[7]   The Construct Validity of the Dutch Personality Inventory for DSM-5 Personality Disorders (PID-5) in a Clinical Sample [J].
Bastiaens, Tim ;
Claes, Laurence ;
Smits, Dirk ;
De Clercq, Barbara ;
De Fruyt, Filip ;
Rossi, Gina ;
Vanwalleghem, Dominique ;
Vermote, Rudi ;
Lowyck, Benedicte ;
Claes, Stephan ;
De Hert, Marc .
ASSESSMENT, 2016, 23 (01) :42-51
[8]   CORE FEATURES OF PERSONALITY DISORDER: DIFFERENTIATING GENERAL PERSONALITY DYSFUNCTIONING FROM PERSONALITY TRAITS [J].
Berghuis, Han ;
Kamphuis, Jan H. ;
Verheul, Roel .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY DISORDERS, 2012, 26 (05) :704-716
[9]   Constructing validity: Basic issues in objective scale development [J].
Clark, LA ;
Watson, D .
PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT, 1995, 7 (03) :309-319
[10]  
Cohen J, 2013, Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences, DOI [10.4324/9780203771587, DOI 10.4324/9780203771587]