Social comparisons in adults with type 2 diabetes: Patients' reasons for target selection

被引:11
作者
Arigo, Danielle [1 ]
Cornell, Max [1 ]
Smyth, Joshua M. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Scranton, Dept Psychol, Scranton, PA 18510 USA
[2] Penn State Univ, Biobehav Hlth & Med, University Pk, PA 16802 USA
关键词
social comparison; type; 2; diabetes; chronic illness; mood; self-care motivation; COMPARISON INFORMATION; CANCER-PATIENTS; GLYCEMIC CONTROL; SELF-MANAGEMENT; IMPACT; MOTIVATION; MODEL; NEUROTICISM; ADJUSTMENT; DEPRESSION;
D O I
10.1080/08870446.2018.1432759
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Objective: To examine reasons for selecting a social comparison target (i. e. a specific other for relative self-evaluation), and their influence on affect and motivation for self-care, in type 2 diabetes (T2DM). Design: Adults with T2DM (n = 180, MA1c = 7.6%) chose to read about one of four targets. Participants rated five reasons for their choice (strongly disagree -strongly agree), and rated affect and self-care motivation before and after reading. Results: To boost confidence in my ability to manage diabetes was rated highest overall (ps < 0.01), though choosing worse-off (vs. better-off) targets was associated with to gain useful information about how to improve (p = 0.04, g2p = 0.05). Selection in order to feel better worked for those who chose better- off targets; choosing worse-off targets for this purpose worsened mood and stress (ps < 0.04, g2p s = 0.02). Choosing worse-off targets to learn about similar others reduced self-care motivation (p < 0.01, g2p = 0.05). Selection in order to boost confidence showed increased motivation only among those who chose better-off targets (p = 0.01). Conclusions: Patients' reasons for a particular comparison are associated with short-term changes in affect and self-care motivation, and warrant greater empirical and clinical attention.
引用
收藏
页码:906 / 924
页数:19
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]   The impact of barriers and self-efficacy on self-care behaviors in type 2 diabetes [J].
Aljasem, LI ;
Peyrot, M ;
Wissow, L ;
Rubin, RR .
DIABETES EDUCATOR, 2001, 27 (03) :393-404
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1959, The psychology of affiliation: Experimental studies of the sources of gregariousness
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1997, Health, coping, and wellbeing: Perspectives from social comparison theory/social comparisons and occupational stress: The identification contrast model
[4]   Perceptions of similarity and response to selected comparison targets in type 2 diabetes [J].
Arigo, Danielle ;
Smyth, Joshua M. ;
Suls, Jerry M. .
PSYCHOLOGY & HEALTH, 2015, 30 (10) :1206-1220
[5]   The social context of the relationship between glycemic control and depressive symptoms in type 2 diabetes [J].
Arigo, Danielle ;
Smyth, Joshua M. ;
Haggerty, Kyle ;
Raggio, Greer A. .
CHRONIC ILLNESS, 2015, 11 (01) :33-43
[6]   Social comparisons and chronic illness: research synthesis and clinical implications [J].
Arigo, Danielle ;
Suls, Jerry M. ;
Smyth, Joshua M. .
HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 2014, 8 (02) :154-214
[7]  
Austin MM, 2005, US ENDOCRINOL, V1, P16, DOI [10.17925/USE.2005.00.01.16, DOI 10.17925/USE.2005.00.01.16]
[8]   SELF-REGULATORY MECHANISMS GOVERNING THE IMPACT OF SOCIAL-COMPARISON ON COMPLEX DECISION-MAKING [J].
BANDURA, A ;
JOURDEN, FJ .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1991, 60 (06) :941-951
[9]   Social comparison and patient information: what do cancer patients want? [J].
Bennenbroek, FTC ;
Buunk, BP ;
van der Zee, KI ;
Grol, B .
PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2002, 47 (01) :5-12
[10]   Motivated use of information about others: Linking the 2 2 achievement goal model to social comparison propensities and processes [J].
Bounoua, Lenda ;
Cury, Francois ;
Regner, Isabelle ;
Huguet, Pascal ;
Barron, Kenneth E. ;
Elliot, Andrew J. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2012, 51 (04) :626-641