Effective and Organ Specific Radiation Doses from Videourodynamics in Children

被引:13
作者
Hsi, Ryan S. [2 ]
Dearn, Jean [1 ]
Dean, Melanie [1 ]
Zamora, David A. [3 ]
Kanal, Kalpana M. [3 ]
Harper, Jonathan D. [2 ]
Merguerian, Paul A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Seattle Childrens Hosp, Div Pediat Urol, Seattle, WA 98105 USA
[2] Univ Washington, Sch Med, Dept Urol, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[3] Univ Washington, Sch Med, Dept Radiol, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
关键词
fluoroscopy; pediatrics; radiation dosage; urodynamics; VOIDING DYSFUNCTION; PULSED FLUOROSCOPY; EXPOSURE; RISKS; URETEROSCOPY; RADIOGRAPHY; CT;
D O I
10.1016/j.juro.2013.05.023
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: Effective and organ specific doses of ionizing radiation during videourodynamics are unknown. We estimated radiation exposure in children undergoing videourodynamics, and identified patient and examination factors that contribute to higher dosing. Materials and Methods: Fluoroscopy data were collected from consecutive patients undergoing videourodynamics. Documented dose metrics were used to calculate entrance skin dose after applying a series of correction factors. Effective doses and organ specific doses (ovaries/testes) were estimated from entrance skin dose using Monte Carlo methods on a mathematical anthropomorphic phantom (ages 0, 1, 5, 10 and 15 years). Regression analysis was performed to determine patient and procedural factors associated with higher dosing. Results: A total of 100 children (45% male, mean +/- SD age 9.3 +/- 5.7 years) were studied. Diagnoses included neurogenic bladder (73%), anatomical abnormality (14%) and functional/nonneurogenic disorder (13%). Mean fluoroscopy time was 0.17 +/- 0.12 minutes. Mean age adjusted entrance skin dose, effective dose, and testis and ovary doses were 2.18 +/- 2.00 mGy, 0.07 +/- 0.05 mSv, 0.09 +/- 0.10 mGy and 0.20 +/- 0.13 mGy, respectively. On univariate analysis age, height, weight, body mass index, bladder capacity and fluoroscopy time were associated with effective dose. On multivariate adjusted analysis, body mass index, bladder capacity and fluoroscopy time were independently associated with effective dose. Conclusions: The average effective dose of ionizing radiation from videourodynamics was less compared to voiding cystourethrogram dose reported in the literature. Greater fluoroscopy time, body mass index and bladder capacity are independently associated with higher dosing.
引用
收藏
页码:1364 / 1369
页数:6
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2006, HLTH RISKS EXPOSURE, pxvi
[2]   Fluoroscopically Guided Interventional Procedures: A Review of Radiation Effects on Patients' Skin and Hair [J].
Balter, Stephen ;
Hopewell, John W. ;
Miller, Donald L. ;
Wagner, Louis K. ;
Zelefsky, Michael J. .
RADIOLOGY, 2010, 254 (02) :326-341
[3]   Current concepts - Computed tomography - An increasing source of radiation exposure [J].
Brenner, David J. ;
Hall, Eric J. .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2007, 357 (22) :2277-2284
[4]   Estimated risks of radiation-induced fatal cancer from pediatric CT [J].
Brenner, DJ ;
Elliston, CD ;
Hall, EJ ;
Berdon, WE .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2001, 176 (02) :289-296
[5]  
Bushberg J T., 2012, The essential physics of medical imaging, V3rd, pxii
[6]   Pulsed Fluoroscopy in Ureteroscopy and Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy [J].
Elkoushy, Mohamed A. ;
Shahrour, Walid ;
Andonian, Sero .
UROLOGY, 2012, 79 (06) :1230-1235
[7]   Evaluation of the utility of video-urodynamics in children with urinary tract infection and voiding dysfunction [J].
Glazier, DB ;
Murphy, DP ;
Fleisher, MH ;
Cummings, KB ;
Barone, JG .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1997, 80 (05) :806-808
[8]  
Hart D, 1994, 262 NRPB SR
[9]   Radiation exposure and the urologist: What are the risks? [J].
Hellawell, GO ;
Mutch, SJ ;
Thevendran, G ;
Wells, E ;
Morgan, RJ .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2005, 174 (03) :948-952
[10]   Assessment of lower urinary tract dysfunction in children with non-neuropathic bladder sphincter dysfunction [J].
Hoebeke, P ;
Vande Walle, J ;
Everaert, K ;
Van Laecke, E ;
Van Gool, JD .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 1999, 35 (01) :57-69