The role of capital costs in decarbonizing the electricity sector

被引:131
作者
Hirth, Lion [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Steckel, Jan Christoph [2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Neon Neue Energieokonom GmbH Neon, Berlin, Germany
[2] Mercator Res Inst Global Commons & Climate Change, Berlin, Germany
[3] Potsdam Inst Climate Impact Res PIK, Potsdam, Germany
[4] Tech Univ Berlin TU Berlin, Berlin, Germany
关键词
carbon pricing; renewable energy; capital costs; climate change mitigation; WIND POWER; VARIABLE RENEWABLES; MARKET VALUE; SOLAR POWER; ENERGY; SYSTEM; VARIABILITY; GENERATION; DESIGN;
D O I
10.1088/1748-9326/11/11/114010
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Low-carbon electricity generation, i.e. renewable energy, nuclear power and carbon capture and storage, is more capital intensive than electricity generation through carbon emitting fossil fuel power stations. High capital costs, expressed as high weighted average cost of capital (WACC), thus tend to encourage the use of fossil fuels. To achieve the same degree of decarbonization, countries with high capital costs therefore need to impose a higher price on carbon emissions than countries with low capital costs. This is particularly relevant for developing and emerging economies, where capital costs tend to be higher than in rich countries. In this paper we quantitatively evaluate how high capital costs impact the transformation of the energy system under climate policy, applying a numerical techno-economic model of the power system. We find that high capital costs can significantly reduce the effectiveness of carbon prices: if carbon emissions are priced at USD 50 per ton and the WACC is 3%, the cost-optimal electricity mix comprises 40% renewable energy. At the same carbon price and a WACC of 15%, the cost-optimal mix comprises almost no renewable energy. At 15% WACC, there is no significant emission mitigation with carbon pricing up to USD 50 per ton, but at 3% WACC and the same carbon price, emissions are reduced by almost half. These results have implications for climate policy; carbon pricing might need to be combined with policies to reduce capital costs of low carbon options in order to decarbonize power systems.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2015, Energy technology perspectives: Mobilizing innovation to accelerate climate actions
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2015, WORLD EN OUTL
[3]  
[Anonymous], WIND TECHN MARK REP
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2016, The Power to Change: Solar and Wind Cost Reduction Potential to 2025
[5]   Adding wind energy to hydropower [J].
Bélanger, C ;
Gagnon, L .
ENERGY POLICY, 2002, 30 (14) :1279-1284
[6]   Carbon lock-in through capital stock inertia associated with weak near-term climate policies [J].
Bertram, Christoph ;
Johnson, Nils ;
Luderer, Gunnar ;
Riahi, Keyvvan ;
Isaac, Morna ;
Eom, Jiyong .
TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2015, 90 :62-72
[7]   The Private and Public Economics of Renewable Electricity Generation [J].
Borenstein, Severin .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVES, 2012, 26 (01) :67-92
[8]  
Cramton P, 2016, GLOBAL CARBON PRICIN
[9]   Commitment accounting of CO2 emissions [J].
Davis, Steven J. ;
Socolow, Robert H. .
ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2014, 9 (08)
[10]   Future CO2 Emissions and Climate Change from Existing Energy Infrastructure [J].
Davis, Steven J. ;
Caldeira, Ken ;
Matthews, H. Damon .
SCIENCE, 2010, 329 (5997) :1330-1333