Social differences in lung cancer management and survival in South East England: a cohort study

被引:30
作者
Berglund, Anders [1 ,2 ]
Lambe, Mats [1 ,2 ]
Luechtenborg, Margreet [3 ]
Linklater, Karen [3 ]
Peake, Michael D. [4 ,5 ]
Holmberg, Lars [2 ,3 ]
Moller, Henrik [3 ]
机构
[1] Karolinska Inst, Dept Med Epidemiol & Biostat, Stockholm, Sweden
[2] Univ Uppsala Hosp, Reg Canc Ctr Cent Sweden, Uppsala, Sweden
[3] Kings Coll London, Sch Med, Div Canc Studies, Thames Canc Registry, London WC2R 2LS, England
[4] Glenfield Gen Hosp, Dept Resp Med, Leicester LE3 9QP, Leics, England
[5] Natl Canc Intelligence Network, London, England
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2012年 / 2卷 / 03期
关键词
SOCIOECONOMIC INEQUALITIES; STAGE; DIAGNOSIS; COMORBIDITY; DENMARK; NORWAY; MODELS; SWEDEN; ACCESS; TRENDS;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001048
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: To examine possible social variations in lung cancer survival and assess if any such gradients can be attributed to social differences in comorbidity, stage at diagnosis or treatment. Design: Population-based cohort identified in the Thames Cancer Registry. Setting: South East England. Participants: 15 582 lung cancer patients diagnosed between 2006 and 2008. Main outcome measures: Stage at diagnosis, surgery, radiotherapy, chemotherapy and survival. Results: The likelihood of being diagnosed as having early-stage disease did not vary by socioeconomic quintiles (p=0.58). In early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer, the likelihood of undergoing surgery was lowest in the most deprived group. There were no socioeconomic differences in the likelihood of receiving radiotherapy in stage III disease, while in advanced disease and in small-cell lung cancer, receipt of chemotherapy differed over socioeconomic quintiles (p<0.01). In early-stage disease and following adjustment for confounders, the HR between the most deprived and the most affluent group was 1.24 (95% CI 0.98 to 1.56). Corresponding estimates in stage III and advanced disease or small-cell lung cancer were 1.16 (95% CI 1.01 to 1.34) and 1.12 (95% CI 1.05 to 1.20), respectively. In early-stage disease, the crude HR between the most deprived and the most affluent group was approximately 1.4 and constant through follow-up, while in patients with advanced disease or small-cell lung cancer, no difference was detectable after 3 months. Conclusion: We observed socioeconomic variations in management and survival in patients diagnosed as having lung cancer in South East England between 2006 and 2008, differences which could not fully be explained by social differences in stage at diagnosis, co-morbidity and treatment. The survival observed in the most affluent group should set the target for what is achievable for all lung cancer patients, managed in the same healthcare system.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 41 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2008, R LANG ENV STAT COMP
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2000, NHS CANC PLAN PLAN I
  • [3] Age and comorbidity as independent prognostic factors in the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer: A review of national cancer institute of Canada clinical trials group trials
    Asmis, Timothy R.
    Ding, Keyue
    Seymour, Lesley
    Shepherd, Frances A.
    Leighl, Natasha B.
    Winton, Tim L.
    Whitehead, Marlo
    Spaans, Johanna N.
    Graham, Barbara C.
    Goss, Glenwood D.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2008, 26 (01) : 54 - 59
  • [4] Diagnosis and treatment of lung cancer: summary of updated NICE guidance
    Baldwin, D. R.
    White, B.
    Schmidt-Hansen, M.
    Champion, A. R.
    Melder, A. M.
    [J]. BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2011, 342
  • [5] Comorbidity, Treatment and Mortality: A Population Based Cohort Study of Prostate Cancer in PCBaSe Sweden
    Berglund, Anders
    Garmo, Hans
    Tishelman, Carol
    Holmberg, Lars
    Stattin, Paer
    Lambe, Mats
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2011, 185 (03) : 833 - 839
  • [6] Social inequalities in non-small cell lung cancer management and survival: a population-based study in central Sweden
    Berglund, Anders
    Holmberg, Lars
    Tishelman, Carol
    Wagenius, Gunnar
    Eaker, Sonja
    Lambe, Mats
    [J]. THORAX, 2010, 65 (04) : 327 - 333
  • [7] Relation between socioeconomic status and tumour stage in patients with breast, colorectal, ovarian, and lung cancer: results from four national, population based studies
    Brewster, DH
    Thomson, CS
    Hole, DJ
    Black, RJ
    Stroner, PL
    Gillis, CR
    [J]. BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2001, 322 (7290): : 830 - 831
  • [8] Cancer and health policy: The postcode lottery of care
    Bungay, H
    [J]. SOCIAL POLICY & ADMINISTRATION, 2005, 39 (01) : 35 - 48
  • [9] A NEW METHOD OF CLASSIFYING PROGNOSTIC CO-MORBIDITY IN LONGITUDINAL-STUDIES - DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION
    CHARLSON, ME
    POMPEI, P
    ALES, KL
    MACKENZIE, CR
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CHRONIC DISEASES, 1987, 40 (05): : 373 - 383
  • [10] Cancer survival in Australia, Canada, Denmark, Norway, Sweden, and the UK, 1995-2007 (the International Cancer Benchmarking Partnership): an analysis of population-based cancer registry data
    Coleman, M. P.
    Forman, D.
    Bryant, H.
    Butler, J.
    Rachet, B.
    Maringe, C.
    Nur, U.
    Tracey, E.
    Coory, M.
    Hatcher, J.
    McGahan, C. E.
    Turner, D.
    Marrett, L.
    Gjerstorff, M. L.
    Johannesen, T. B.
    Adolfsson, J.
    Lambe, M.
    Lawrence, G.
    Meechan, D.
    Morris, E. J.
    Middleton, R.
    Steward, J.
    Richards, M. A.
    [J]. LANCET, 2011, 377 (9760) : 127 - 138