Selective vaginal breech delivery at term - still an option

被引:46
作者
Toivonen, Elli [1 ]
Palomaki, Outi [2 ]
Huhtala, Heini [3 ]
Uotila, Jukka [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tampere, Sch Med, Tampere 33041, Finland
[2] Tampere Univ Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Tampere, Finland
[3] Tampere Univ Hosp, Res Unit, Tampere, Finland
关键词
Breech presentation; cesarean section; trial of labor; neonatal morbidity; birth trauma; Apgar score; CESAREAN DELIVERY; INFANTS; MODE; MORBIDITY; SECTION; TRIAL;
D O I
10.1111/j.1600-0412.2012.01488.x
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective. To compare the neonatal outcome between planned vaginal or planned cesarean section (CS) breech delivery and planned vaginal vertex delivery at term with singleton fetuses. Design. A cohort study. Setting. Delivery Unit, Tampere University Hospital, Finland, with 5200 annual deliveries. Population. The term breech deliveries over a period of five years (January 2004 to January 2009), a total of 751 breech deliveries, and 257 vertex controls. Methods. The data were collected from the mother's medical records, including a summary of the newborn. In the case of neonatal health problems, the pediatric records were also examined. Main outcome measures. Maternal and neonatal mortality and morbidity as defined in the Term Breech Trial. Low Apgar scores or umbilical cord pH as secondary end-points. Results. There was no neonatal mortality. Severe morbidity was rare in all groups, with no differences between groups. The Apgar scores at one minute were lower in the planned vaginal delivery group compared with the other groups, but there was no difference at the age of five minutes. Significantly more infants in the vaginal delivery group had a cord pH < 7.05. There was one maternal death due to a complicated CS in the planned CS group and none in the other groups. Mothers in the planned CS group suffered significantly more often from massive bleeding and needed transfusions. Conclusions. Vaginal delivery remains an acceptable option for breech delivery in selected cases.
引用
收藏
页码:1177 / 1183
页数:7
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]  
ACOG Committee on Obstetric Practice, 2006, Obstet Gynecol, V108, P235
[2]   Singleton vaginal breech delivery at term: Still a safe option [J].
Alarab, M ;
Regan, C ;
O'Connell, MP ;
Keane, DP ;
O'Herlihy, C ;
Foley, ME .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2004, 103 (03) :407-412
[3]  
American College of obstetricians and gynecologists, 2002, INT J GYNECOL OBSTET, V77, P65
[4]   Pregnancy outcomes by mode of delivery among breech births [J].
Demirci, Oya ;
Tugrul, Ahmet Semih ;
Turgut, Abdulkadir ;
Ceyian, Sirin ;
Eren, Sadiye .
ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 2012, 285 (02) :297-303
[5]   CATECHOLAMINE SURGE AND LUNG-FUNCTION AFTER DELIVERY [J].
FAXELIUS, G ;
HAGNEVIK, K ;
LAGERCRANTZ, H ;
LUNDELL, B ;
IRESTEDT, L .
ARCHIVES OF DISEASE IN CHILDHOOD, 1983, 58 (04) :262-266
[6]   Neonatal impact of elective repeat cesarean delivery at term: A comment on patient choice cesarean delivery [J].
Fogelson, NS ;
Menard, MK ;
Hulsey, T ;
Ebeling, M .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2005, 192 (05) :1433-1436
[7]   Mode of delivery and outcome of 699 term singleton breech deliveries at a single center [J].
Giuliani, A ;
Schöll, WMJ ;
Basver, A ;
Tamussino, KR .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2002, 187 (06) :1694-1698
[8]   Is planned vaginal delivery for breech presentation at term still an option?: Results of an observational prospective survey in France and Belgium [J].
Goffinet, F ;
Carayol, M ;
Foidart, JM ;
Alexander, S ;
Uzan, S ;
Subtil, D ;
Bréart, G .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2006, 194 (04) :1002-1011
[9]   Planned vaginal delivery versus elective caesarean section in singleton term breech presentation: a study of 1116 cases [J].
Golfier, F ;
Vaudoyer, F ;
Ecochard, R ;
Champion, F ;
Audra, P ;
Raudrant, D .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2001, 98 (02) :186-192
[10]   Planned caesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: a randomised multicentre trial [J].
Hannah, ME ;
Hannah, WJ ;
Hewson, SA ;
Hodnett, ED ;
Saigal, S ;
Willan, AR .
LANCET, 2000, 356 (9239) :1375-1383