A cost effective method of identifying and recruiting persons over 80 free of dementia or mild cognitive impairment

被引:29
作者
Graff-Radford, NR
Ferman, TJ
Lucas, JA
Johnson, HK
Patfitt, FC
Heckman, MG
Todd, M
Sadowsky, C
Epstein, DE
Crook, JE
机构
[1] Mayo Clin Jacksonville, Dept Neurol, Jacksonville, FL 32224 USA
[2] Mayo Clin Jacksonville, Dept Psychiat & Psychol, Jacksonville, FL USA
[3] Mayo Clin Jacksonville, Biostat Unit, Jacksonville, FL USA
[4] N Broward Memory Disorder Clin, Ft Lauderdale, FL USA
[5] W Palm Memory Disorder Clin, W Palm, FL USA
关键词
cognitively normal elderly; telephone evaluation; clinical dementia rating scale; telephone interview cognitive status-modified;
D O I
10.1097/01.wad.0000213813.35424.d2
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
For observational or prevention studies, accurately identifying by mail and telephone cognitively normal elderly volunteers would be cost effective. We describe how to recruit cognitively normal sib-pairs over age 80 using commercially available lists by age and ZIP code. We mailed an Institutional Review Board-approved letter to 24,366 persons over 85 around Jacksonville, FL, and received similar to 3000 postcard replies with similar to 500 answering 3 screening statements affirmatively. Of these, we recruited 128 persons who underwent both in-person and telephone evaluations, the latter using the Telephone Interview of Cognitive Status-modified (TICS-m) and Clinical Dementia Rating scale (CDR). Blinded to the TICS-m and CDR data, clinicians made a consensus diagnosis for each participant, 120 were normal and 8 had mild cognitive impairment. With CDR, 119 patients (93%) screened as normal, and of these 115 (97%) were confirmed as normal with the consensus diagnosis. A TICS-m score cut-off of < 29 resulted in a similar proportion of normals in the screened sample (97% or 103/106); however, 13 normal volunteers would have been excluded because they scored < 29 on the TICS-m. Supplementing the sample, we recruited 12 age-matched cases having consensus diagnosis of dementia (n = 2) or mild cognitive impairment (n = 10). A CDR > 0 correctly identified 12/12, whereas the TICS-m < 29 correctly identified 7/12. Hearing loss present in 50% did not influence TICS-m or CDR performance. Using stringent entry criteria and the telephone CDR, this method accurately identified normal elderly persons.
引用
收藏
页码:101 / 104
页数:4
相关论文
共 21 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 1983, BOSTON NAMING TEST
  • [2] [Anonymous], 1985, HALSTEAD REITAN NEUR
  • [3] [Anonymous], WESCHLER ADULT INTEL
  • [4] Baker F M, 1991, J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol, V4, P218, DOI 10.1177/089198879100400407
  • [5] Benton A. L., 1983, MULTILINGUAL APHASIA, DOI [DOI 10.1037/T10132-000, 10.1037/t10132-000]
  • [6] EVALUATING STORAGE, RETENTION, AND RETRIEVAL IN DISORDERED MEMORY AND LEARNING
    BUSCHKE, H
    FULD, PA
    [J]. NEUROLOGY, 1974, 24 (11) : 1019 - 1025
  • [7] Collins R, 2002, LANCET, V360, P7, DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)09327-3
  • [8] COSTA R, 2000, NEUROBIOL AGING, V21, pS92
  • [9] Feller William, 1950, An Introduction to Probability Theory and its Applications I
  • [10] MINI-MENTAL STATE - PRACTICAL METHOD FOR GRADING COGNITIVE STATE OF PATIENTS FOR CLINICIAN
    FOLSTEIN, MF
    FOLSTEIN, SE
    MCHUGH, PR
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRIC RESEARCH, 1975, 12 (03) : 189 - 198