Analysis of a practical surgical skills laboratory for nerve sparing radical prostatectomy

被引:2
|
作者
Clarebrough, Emma [1 ,2 ]
Christidis, Daniel [2 ,3 ]
Lindner, Uri [4 ]
Fernandes, Kimberly [4 ]
Fleshner, Neil [4 ]
Lawrentschuk, Nathan [5 ,6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Royal Melbourne Hosp, Dept Surg, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[2] YURO, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[3] Austin Hlth, Dept Surg, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[4] Univ Toronto, Princess Margaret Hosp, Dept Urol & Surg Oncol, Toronto, ON, Canada
[5] Univ Melbourne, Austin Hlth, Dept Surg, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[6] Austin Hlth, Olivia Newton John Canc Res Inst, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[7] Peter MacCallum Canc Ctr, Div Canc Surg, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
关键词
Prostate cancer; Neurovascular bundle; Anatomical models; Surgical skills laboratory; Nerve-sparing prostatectomy; DISSECTION; SIMULATION; FASCIA; BUNDLE; VEIL;
D O I
10.1007/s00345-018-2472-7
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
PurposeWith the rapidly expanding anatomical and technical knowledge surrounding nervesparing radical prostatectomy (NSRP), anatomical and operative textbooks have failed to keep pace with the literature. A surgical skill laboratory (SSL) was designed to educate urology trainees on surgical anatomy and techniques for NSRP. The objective was to assess the validity of a SSL program.MethodsA low-fidelity, anatomically accurate prostate model with its appropriate fascial coverings and location of the neurovascular bundle was created. Participants were surveyed prior to a SSL workshop for their knowledge of NSRP focusing on clinical and anatomical considerations. An interactive 2-h tutorial and workshop was then undertaken outlining the clinical and anatomical nuances for NSRP, with participants then practising an intra and inter-fascial NSRP on the model. Participants were resurveyed immediately after the workshop and at 6months.ResultsThirty participants completed the NSRP workshop. Significant differences (p<0.0001) in anatomical and clinical knowledge were noted after the workshop with improvements for both junior and senior trainees. The knowledge was retained at 6months following the workshop.ConclusionsA low-fidelity bench-top model is a feasible and reproducible technique for improving the understanding of periprostatic anatomy and the different surgical approaches for NSRP. The SSL is useful and knowledge gained appears to be retained by workshop participants. SSL workshops are a valid hands-on approach to teaching surgical skills and should remain an integral part of urology training.
引用
收藏
页码:799 / 804
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Influence of nerve-sparing (NS) procedure during radical prostatectomy (RP) on margin status and biochemical failure
    Palisaar, RR
    Noldus, J
    Graefen, M
    Erbersdobler, A
    Haese, A
    Huland, H
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2005, 47 (02) : 176 - 184
  • [42] Urinary continence recovery after radical prostatectomy - anatomical/reconstructive and nerve-sparing techniques to improve outcomes
    Pavlovich, Christian P.
    Rocco, Bernardo
    Druskin, Sasha C.
    Davis, John W.
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2017, 120 (02) : 185 - 196
  • [43] Baseline factors and surgical procedures affecting changes in lower urinary tract symptoms after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: the impact of nerve-sparing
    Soda, Takeshi
    Otsuka, Hikari
    Koike, Shuhei
    Okada, Takuya
    INTERNATIONAL UROLOGY AND NEPHROLOGY, 2024, 56 (03) : 989 - 997
  • [44] Intrafascial nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy improves patients' postoperative continence recovery and erectile function A pooled analysis based on available literatures
    Wang, Xiao
    Wu, Yiqi
    Guo, Jia
    Chen, Hui
    Weng, Xiaodong
    Liu, Xiuheng
    MEDICINE, 2018, 97 (29)
  • [45] Anatomical grades of nerve sparing: a risk-stratified approach to neural-hammock sparing during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP)
    Tewari, Ashutosh K.
    Srivastava, Abhishek
    Huang, Michael W.
    Robinson, Brian D.
    Shevchuk, Maria M.
    Durand, Matthieu
    Sooriakumaran, Prasanna
    Grover, Sonal
    Yadav, Rajiv
    Mishra, Nishant
    Mohan, Sanjay
    Brooks, Danielle C.
    Shaikh, Nusrat
    Khanna, Abhinav
    Leung, Robert
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2011, 108 (6B) : 984 - 992
  • [46] Predicting Erectile Function Recovery after Bilateral Nerve Sparing Radical Prostatectomy: A Proposal of a Novel Preoperative Risk Stratification
    Briganti, Alberto
    Gallina, Andrea
    Suardi, Nazareno
    Capitanio, Umberto
    Tutolo, Manuela
    Bianchi, Marco
    Passoni, Niccolo
    Salonia, Andrea
    Colombo, Renzo
    Di Girolamo, Valerio
    Guazzoni, Giorgio
    Rigatti, Patrizio
    Montorsi, Francesco
    JOURNAL OF SEXUAL MEDICINE, 2010, 7 (07): : 2521 - 2531
  • [47] Randomized Comparison between Laparoscopic and Robot-Assisted Nerve-Sparing Radical Prostatectomy
    Asimakopoulos, Anastasios D.
    Fraga, Clovis T. Pereira
    Annino, Filippo
    Pasqualetti, Patrizio
    Calado, Adriano A.
    Mugnier, Camille
    JOURNAL OF SEXUAL MEDICINE, 2011, 8 (05): : 1503 - 1512
  • [48] NERVE-SPARING RADICAL RETROPUBIC PROSTATECTOMY FOR LOCALIZED PROSTATE-CANCER - THE PROS AND CONS
    ZIMMERN, PE
    LEACH, GE
    CANCER, 1995, 75 (07) : 1944 - 1948
  • [49] Active Patient Decision Making Regarding Nerve Sparing During Radical Prostatectomy: A Novel Approach
    Lavery, Hugh J.
    Prall, David N.
    Abaza, Ronney
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2011, 186 (02): : 487 - 492
  • [50] Surgery Insight: optimizing open nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy techniques for improved outcomes
    Eastham, James A.
    NATURE CLINICAL PRACTICE UROLOGY, 2007, 4 (10): : 561 - 569