Analysis of a practical surgical skills laboratory for nerve sparing radical prostatectomy

被引:2
|
作者
Clarebrough, Emma [1 ,2 ]
Christidis, Daniel [2 ,3 ]
Lindner, Uri [4 ]
Fernandes, Kimberly [4 ]
Fleshner, Neil [4 ]
Lawrentschuk, Nathan [5 ,6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Royal Melbourne Hosp, Dept Surg, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[2] YURO, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[3] Austin Hlth, Dept Surg, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[4] Univ Toronto, Princess Margaret Hosp, Dept Urol & Surg Oncol, Toronto, ON, Canada
[5] Univ Melbourne, Austin Hlth, Dept Surg, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[6] Austin Hlth, Olivia Newton John Canc Res Inst, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[7] Peter MacCallum Canc Ctr, Div Canc Surg, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
关键词
Prostate cancer; Neurovascular bundle; Anatomical models; Surgical skills laboratory; Nerve-sparing prostatectomy; DISSECTION; SIMULATION; FASCIA; BUNDLE; VEIL;
D O I
10.1007/s00345-018-2472-7
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
PurposeWith the rapidly expanding anatomical and technical knowledge surrounding nervesparing radical prostatectomy (NSRP), anatomical and operative textbooks have failed to keep pace with the literature. A surgical skill laboratory (SSL) was designed to educate urology trainees on surgical anatomy and techniques for NSRP. The objective was to assess the validity of a SSL program.MethodsA low-fidelity, anatomically accurate prostate model with its appropriate fascial coverings and location of the neurovascular bundle was created. Participants were surveyed prior to a SSL workshop for their knowledge of NSRP focusing on clinical and anatomical considerations. An interactive 2-h tutorial and workshop was then undertaken outlining the clinical and anatomical nuances for NSRP, with participants then practising an intra and inter-fascial NSRP on the model. Participants were resurveyed immediately after the workshop and at 6months.ResultsThirty participants completed the NSRP workshop. Significant differences (p<0.0001) in anatomical and clinical knowledge were noted after the workshop with improvements for both junior and senior trainees. The knowledge was retained at 6months following the workshop.ConclusionsA low-fidelity bench-top model is a feasible and reproducible technique for improving the understanding of periprostatic anatomy and the different surgical approaches for NSRP. The SSL is useful and knowledge gained appears to be retained by workshop participants. SSL workshops are a valid hands-on approach to teaching surgical skills and should remain an integral part of urology training.
引用
收藏
页码:799 / 804
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Rehabilitative therapy for erectile function after nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy
    Bannowsky, Andreas
    Schulze, Heiko
    Junemann, Klaus-Peter
    JOURNAL OF MENS HEALTH, 2010, 7 (04) : 390 - 395
  • [32] Bilateral vs unilateral laparoscopic intrafascial nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy: evaluation of surgical and functional outcomes in 457 patients
    Greco, Francesco
    Hoda, M. Raschid
    Wagner, Sigrid
    Reichelt, Olaf
    Inferrera, Antonino
    Magno, Carlo
    Fornara, Paolo
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2011, 108 (04) : 583 - 587
  • [33] Effects of different surgical modalities for nerve-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy on postoperative erectile function: a systematic review and one-arm meta-analysis
    Liang, Zichun
    Liu, Chunhui
    Gu, Qingwen
    Gao, Yue
    Chen, Ming
    Sun, Chao
    BIOTECHNOLOGY AND GENETIC ENGINEERING REVIEWS, 2024, 40 (03) : 1959 - 1984
  • [34] Quantitative and qualitative analysis of the recovery of potency after radical prostatectomy: effect of unilateral vs bilateral nerve sparing
    Finley, David S.
    Rodriguez, Esequiel, Jr.
    Skarecky, Douglas W.
    Ahlering, Thomas E.
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2009, 104 (10) : 1484 - 1489
  • [35] Nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy: steps to standardize surgical technique
    Muallem, Mustafa Zelal
    Diab, Yasser
    Sehouli, Jalid
    Fujii, Shingo
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2019, 29 (07) : 1203 - 1208
  • [36] Erectile function recovery in patients after non-nerve sparing radical prostatectomy
    Krishnan, R.
    Katz, D.
    Nelson, C. J.
    Mulhall, J. P.
    ANDROLOGY, 2014, 2 (06) : 951 - 954
  • [37] An operative and anatomic study to help in nerve sparing during laparoscopic and robotic radical prostatectomy
    Tewari, A
    Peabody, JO
    Fischer, M
    Sarle, R
    Vallancien, G
    Delmas, V
    Hassan, M
    Bansal, A
    Hemal, AK
    Guillonneau, B
    Menon, M
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2003, 43 (05) : 444 - 454
  • [38] Erectile function after non-nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy: Fact or fiction?
    Borchers, H
    Brehmer, B
    Kirschner-Hermanns, R
    Reineke, T
    Tietze, L
    Jakse, G
    UROLOGIA INTERNATIONALIS, 2006, 76 (03) : 213 - 216
  • [39] Nerve-sparing techniques in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy - anatomical approach
    Czarnogorski, Michal C.
    Settaf-Cherif, Layla
    Koper, Krzysztof
    Petrasz, Piotr
    Ostrowski, Adam
    Juszczak, Kajetan
    Drewa, Tomasz
    Adamowicz, Jan
    EXPERT REVIEW OF MEDICAL DEVICES, 2024, 21 (12) : 1101 - 1110
  • [40] What Is the Definition of a Satisfactory Erectile Function After Bilateral Nerve Sparing Radical Prostatectomy?
    Briganti, Alberto
    Gallina, Andrea
    Suardi, Nazareno
    Capitanio, Umberto
    Tutolo, Manuela
    Bianchi, Marco
    Salonia, Andrea
    Colombo, Renzo
    Di Girolamo, Valerio
    Martinez-Salamanca, Juan Ignazio
    Guazzoni, Giorgio
    Rigatti, Patrizio
    Montorsi, Francesco
    JOURNAL OF SEXUAL MEDICINE, 2011, 8 (04): : 1210 - 1217