Ocular Surface Stem Cell Transplantation Rejection: Incidence, Characteristics, and Outcomes

被引:44
|
作者
Ang, Andrea Y. [1 ]
Chan, Clara C. [2 ]
Biber, Joseph M. [3 ,4 ]
Holland, Edward J. [1 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Cincinnati Eye Inst, Cincinnati, OH USA
[2] Univ Toronto, Dept Ophthalmol Vis Sci, Toronto, ON, Canada
[3] Horizon Eye Care, Charlotte, NC USA
[4] Univ Cincinnati, Dept Ophthalmol, Cincinnati, OH USA
关键词
ocular surface stem cell transplantation; limbal stem cell transplantation; keratolimbal allograft; rejection; LONG-TERM OUTCOMES; KERATOLIMBAL ALLOGRAFT; LIMBAL TRANSPLANTATION; RENAL-TRANSPLANTATION; CORNEAL EPITHELIUM; RECONSTRUCTION; KERATOEPITHELIOPLASTY; DEFICIENCY; DISORDERS;
D O I
10.1097/ICO.0b013e318255eac4
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose: To describe the incidence, characteristics, risk factors, treatment, and outcomes of ocular surface stem cell transplantation (OSST) rejection. Methods: A chart review of patients who had OSST at a single institution between 1998 and 2010 was performed. Data were collected on patient demographics, type of OSST procedure, duration of immunosuppression, and rejection characteristics. Main outcome measures were ocular surface stability and improvement in best-corrected visual acuity. Results: Two hundred twenty-two eyes of 158 patients were included with mean follow-up of 62.7 months (range, 12.0-158.3 months). The most common indications for OSST were aniridia (46.4%), chemical/thermal injury (22.1%), and Stevens-Johnson syndrome (12.2%). The most common procedures performed were keratolimbal allograft (KLAL) alone (80.6%) and combined living-related conjunctival allograft (lr-CLAL)-KLAL (11.3%). Mean time on immunosuppression was 44.3 months (range, 7.6-138.2 months). Severe rejection occurred in 43 eyes (19.4%) with mean time to rejection being 15.2 months (range, 0.2-93.1 months). Low-grade rejection occurred in 26 eyes (11.7%) with mean time to rejection being 26.2 months (range, 1.3-64.9 months). At the final follow-up, 36.6% of eyes in the rejection group achieved a stable ocular surface compared with 71.9% of eyes in the nonrejection group (P < 0.0001). Risk factors associated with increased risk of rejection were younger age (P < 0.0001), KLAL alone (P = 0.049), and noncompliance with immunosuppression (P = 0.047). Conclusions: Ocular surface outcomes for patients with OSST rejection are poor, with the majority of patients having failed ocular surfaces despite treatment with increased immunosuppression and repeat OSST. It is critical for success that OSST patients are closely monitored for rejection and for compliance with immunosuppression.
引用
收藏
页码:229 / 236
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Comparison of Glaucoma Drainage Device Versus Transscleral Cyclophotocoagulation for Secondary Glaucoma Following Ocular Surface Stem Cell Transplantation
    Denny, Matthew R.
    Chu, Fred B.
    Cheung, Albert Y.
    Holland, Edward J.
    JOURNAL OF GLAUCOMA, 2021, 30 (03) : E119 - E122
  • [32] Oral Mucosal Graft With Amniotic Membrane Transplantation for Total Limbal Stem Cell Deficiency
    Liu, Jingbo
    Sheha, Hosam
    Fu, Yao
    Giegengack, Matthew
    Tseng, Scheffer C. G.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2011, 152 (05) : 739 - 747
  • [33] Incidence and impact of rejection following simultaneous liver-kidney transplantation
    Nilles, Kathy M.
    Krupp, James
    Lapin, Brittany
    Sustento-Reodica, Nedjema
    Gallon, Lorenzo
    Levitsky, Josh
    JOURNAL OF HEPATOLOGY, 2015, 62 (02) : 340 - 345
  • [34] Limbal stem cell transplantation: new progresses and challenges
    Liang, L.
    Sheha, H.
    Li, J.
    Tseng, S. C. G.
    EYE, 2009, 23 (10) : 1946 - 1953
  • [35] Ocular Surface Reconstruction by Cultivated Epithelial Sheet Transplantation
    Satake, Yoshiyuki
    Yamaguchi, Takefumi
    Hirayama, Masatoshi
    Higa, Kazunari
    Shimazaki-Den, Seika
    Dogru, Murat
    Kawakita, Tetsuya
    Kawashima, Motoko
    Shimmura, Shigeto
    Tsubota, Kazuo
    Shimazaki, Jun
    CORNEA, 2014, 33 : S42 - S46
  • [36] Outcomes of Combined Penetrating Keratoplasty and Limbal Stem Cell Transplantation: A Meta-Analysis on Simultaneous Versus Sequential Surgery
    Giachos, Ioannis
    Angelidis, Constantine D.
    Doumazos, Spyros
    Tzavara, Chara
    Palioura, Sotiria
    CORNEA, 2023, 42 (06) : 787 - 796
  • [37] Midterm Outcomes of Autologous Cultivated Limbal Stem Cell Transplantation With or Without Penetrating Keratoplasty
    Baradaran-Rafii, Alireza
    Ebrahimi, Marzieh
    Kanavi, Mozhgan Rezaei
    Taghi-Abadi, Ehsan
    Aghdami, Nasser
    Eslani, Medi
    Bakhtiari, Pejman
    Einollahi, Bahram
    Baharvand, Hossein
    Javadi, Mohammad-Ali
    CORNEA, 2010, 29 (05) : 502 - 509
  • [38] Transforming ocular surface stem cell research into successful clinical practice
    Sangwan, Virender S.
    Jain, Rajat
    Basu, Sayan
    Bagadi, Anupam B.
    Sureka, Shraddha
    Mariappan, Indumathi
    MacNeil, Sheila
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2014, 62 (01) : 29 - 40
  • [39] The surgical outcomes of limbal allograft transplantation in eyes having limbal stem cell deficiency
    Ozer, Muhammet Derda
    Altinkurt, Emre
    Yilmaz, Yusuf Cem
    Gedik, Ali Ceyhun
    Alparslan, Nilufer
    JOURNAL OF CURRENT OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2020, 32 (02): : 132 - 141
  • [40] Long-term Outcomes of Keratolimbal Allograft for Total Limbal Stem Cell Deficiency Using Combined Immunosuppressive Agents and Correction of Ocular Surface Deficits
    Liang, Lingyi
    Sheha, Hosam
    Tseng, Scheffer C. G.
    ARCHIVES OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2009, 127 (11) : 1428 - 1434