Ocular Surface Stem Cell Transplantation Rejection: Incidence, Characteristics, and Outcomes

被引:44
|
作者
Ang, Andrea Y. [1 ]
Chan, Clara C. [2 ]
Biber, Joseph M. [3 ,4 ]
Holland, Edward J. [1 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Cincinnati Eye Inst, Cincinnati, OH USA
[2] Univ Toronto, Dept Ophthalmol Vis Sci, Toronto, ON, Canada
[3] Horizon Eye Care, Charlotte, NC USA
[4] Univ Cincinnati, Dept Ophthalmol, Cincinnati, OH USA
关键词
ocular surface stem cell transplantation; limbal stem cell transplantation; keratolimbal allograft; rejection; LONG-TERM OUTCOMES; KERATOLIMBAL ALLOGRAFT; LIMBAL TRANSPLANTATION; RENAL-TRANSPLANTATION; CORNEAL EPITHELIUM; RECONSTRUCTION; KERATOEPITHELIOPLASTY; DEFICIENCY; DISORDERS;
D O I
10.1097/ICO.0b013e318255eac4
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose: To describe the incidence, characteristics, risk factors, treatment, and outcomes of ocular surface stem cell transplantation (OSST) rejection. Methods: A chart review of patients who had OSST at a single institution between 1998 and 2010 was performed. Data were collected on patient demographics, type of OSST procedure, duration of immunosuppression, and rejection characteristics. Main outcome measures were ocular surface stability and improvement in best-corrected visual acuity. Results: Two hundred twenty-two eyes of 158 patients were included with mean follow-up of 62.7 months (range, 12.0-158.3 months). The most common indications for OSST were aniridia (46.4%), chemical/thermal injury (22.1%), and Stevens-Johnson syndrome (12.2%). The most common procedures performed were keratolimbal allograft (KLAL) alone (80.6%) and combined living-related conjunctival allograft (lr-CLAL)-KLAL (11.3%). Mean time on immunosuppression was 44.3 months (range, 7.6-138.2 months). Severe rejection occurred in 43 eyes (19.4%) with mean time to rejection being 15.2 months (range, 0.2-93.1 months). Low-grade rejection occurred in 26 eyes (11.7%) with mean time to rejection being 26.2 months (range, 1.3-64.9 months). At the final follow-up, 36.6% of eyes in the rejection group achieved a stable ocular surface compared with 71.9% of eyes in the nonrejection group (P < 0.0001). Risk factors associated with increased risk of rejection were younger age (P < 0.0001), KLAL alone (P = 0.049), and noncompliance with immunosuppression (P = 0.047). Conclusions: Ocular surface outcomes for patients with OSST rejection are poor, with the majority of patients having failed ocular surfaces despite treatment with increased immunosuppression and repeat OSST. It is critical for success that OSST patients are closely monitored for rejection and for compliance with immunosuppression.
引用
收藏
页码:229 / 236
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Why Are Corneal Specialists Resistant to Treating Patients Who Have Severe Ocular Surface Disease With Limbal Stem Cell Deficiency?
    Holland, Edward J.
    Cheung, Albert Y.
    Djalilian, Ali R.
    Farid, Marjan
    Mannis, Mark J.
    CORNEA, 2023, 42 (09) : 1063 - 1068
  • [22] Ocular surface reconstruction in limbal stem cell deficiency. Transplantation of cultivated limbal epithelium
    Meller, D.
    Thomasen, H.
    Steuhl, K. -P.
    OPHTHALMOLOGE, 2012, 109 (09): : 863 - 868
  • [23] Clinical Outcomes of Repeat Autologous Cultivated Limbal Epithelial Transplantation for Ocular Surface Burns
    Basu, Sayan
    Ali, Md Hasnat
    Sangwan, Virender S.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2012, 153 (04) : 643 - 650
  • [24] Late Acute Rejection After Allograft Limbal Stem Cell Transplantation: Evidence for Long-Term Donor Survival
    Eslani, Medi
    Haq, Zeeshan
    Movahedan, Asadolah
    Moss, Adam
    Baradaran-Rafii, Alireza
    Mogilishetty, Gautham
    Holland, Edward J.
    Djalilian, Ali R.
    CORNEA, 2017, 36 (01) : 26 - 31
  • [25] Immunocytochemistry of the ocular surface after different techniques of limbal stem cell transplantation for chronic chemical burns
    Arora, Ritu
    Saran, Ravindra
    Jha, Vikas
    Gotmare, Nikhil Dattatraya
    Jain, Parul
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2022, 106 (04) : 461 - 466
  • [26] Xenofree generation of limbal stem cells for ocular surface advanced cell therapy
    Nieto-Nicolau, Nuria
    Martinez-Conesa, Eva M.
    Velasco-Garcia, Alba M.
    Aloy-Reverte, Caterina
    Vilarrodona, Anna
    Casaroli-Marano, Ricardo P.
    STEM CELL RESEARCH & THERAPY, 2019, 10 (01)
  • [27] Allogenic cultivated limbal stem cell transplantation versus cadaveric keratolimbal allograft in ocular surface disorder: 1-year outcome
    Parihar, Jitendra Kumar Singh
    Parihar, Avinash Singh
    Jain, Vaibhav Kumar
    Kaushik, Jaya
    Nath, Pramod
    INTERNATIONAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2017, 37 (06) : 1323 - 1331
  • [28] Ocular characteristics and outcomes of phacoemulsification in patients with cataract after renal transplantation
    Chen, Yilin
    Yang, Pingxiao
    Li, Wentao
    Huo, Lijun
    INTERNATIONAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2024, 44 (01)
  • [29] Understanding Ocular Surface Inflammation in Tears Before and After Autologous Cultivated Limbal Epithelial Stem Cell Transplantation
    Figueiredo, Gustavo S.
    Hogg, Jeffry
    Okonkwo, Arthur
    Baylis, Oliver J.
    Berry, Monica
    Ali, Simi
    Lako, Majlinda
    Figueiredo, Francisco C.
    OPHTHALMOLOGY AND THERAPY, 2023, 12 (02) : 1097 - 1107
  • [30] Contemporary limbal stem cell transplantation - a review
    Dua, Harminder S.
    Miri, Ammar
    Said, Dalia G.
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2010, 38 (02) : 104 - 117