Ocular Surface Stem Cell Transplantation Rejection: Incidence, Characteristics, and Outcomes

被引:44
|
作者
Ang, Andrea Y. [1 ]
Chan, Clara C. [2 ]
Biber, Joseph M. [3 ,4 ]
Holland, Edward J. [1 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Cincinnati Eye Inst, Cincinnati, OH USA
[2] Univ Toronto, Dept Ophthalmol Vis Sci, Toronto, ON, Canada
[3] Horizon Eye Care, Charlotte, NC USA
[4] Univ Cincinnati, Dept Ophthalmol, Cincinnati, OH USA
关键词
ocular surface stem cell transplantation; limbal stem cell transplantation; keratolimbal allograft; rejection; LONG-TERM OUTCOMES; KERATOLIMBAL ALLOGRAFT; LIMBAL TRANSPLANTATION; RENAL-TRANSPLANTATION; CORNEAL EPITHELIUM; RECONSTRUCTION; KERATOEPITHELIOPLASTY; DEFICIENCY; DISORDERS;
D O I
10.1097/ICO.0b013e318255eac4
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose: To describe the incidence, characteristics, risk factors, treatment, and outcomes of ocular surface stem cell transplantation (OSST) rejection. Methods: A chart review of patients who had OSST at a single institution between 1998 and 2010 was performed. Data were collected on patient demographics, type of OSST procedure, duration of immunosuppression, and rejection characteristics. Main outcome measures were ocular surface stability and improvement in best-corrected visual acuity. Results: Two hundred twenty-two eyes of 158 patients were included with mean follow-up of 62.7 months (range, 12.0-158.3 months). The most common indications for OSST were aniridia (46.4%), chemical/thermal injury (22.1%), and Stevens-Johnson syndrome (12.2%). The most common procedures performed were keratolimbal allograft (KLAL) alone (80.6%) and combined living-related conjunctival allograft (lr-CLAL)-KLAL (11.3%). Mean time on immunosuppression was 44.3 months (range, 7.6-138.2 months). Severe rejection occurred in 43 eyes (19.4%) with mean time to rejection being 15.2 months (range, 0.2-93.1 months). Low-grade rejection occurred in 26 eyes (11.7%) with mean time to rejection being 26.2 months (range, 1.3-64.9 months). At the final follow-up, 36.6% of eyes in the rejection group achieved a stable ocular surface compared with 71.9% of eyes in the nonrejection group (P < 0.0001). Risk factors associated with increased risk of rejection were younger age (P < 0.0001), KLAL alone (P = 0.049), and noncompliance with immunosuppression (P = 0.047). Conclusions: Ocular surface outcomes for patients with OSST rejection are poor, with the majority of patients having failed ocular surfaces despite treatment with increased immunosuppression and repeat OSST. It is critical for success that OSST patients are closely monitored for rejection and for compliance with immunosuppression.
引用
收藏
页码:229 / 236
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Outcomes of Keratoplasty After Ocular Surface Stem Cell Transplantation
    Sepsakos, Lorena
    Cheung, Albert Y.
    Holland, Edward J.
    CORNEA, 2017, 36 (09) : 1025 - 1030
  • [2] Long-term Outcomes of Ocular Surface Stem Cell Allograft Transplantation
    Movahedan, Asadolah
    Cheung, Albert Y.
    Eslani, Medi
    Mogilishetty, Gautham
    Govil, Amit
    Holland, Edward J.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2017, 184 : 97 - 107
  • [3] Clinical Outcomes of Allogeneic Ocular Surface Stem Cell Transplantation in Pediatric Patients
    Cheung, Albert Y.
    Sarnicola, Enrica
    Eslani, Medi
    Wright, Elizabeth
    Goebel, Jens
    Hooper, David K.
    Govil, Amit
    Kurji, Khaliq H.
    Holland, Edward J.
    CORNEA, 2021, 40 (01) : 54 - 60
  • [4] Infectious Keratitis After Ocular Surface Stem Cell Transplantation
    Cheung, Albert Y.
    Sarnicola, Enrica
    Eslani, Medi
    Kurji, Khaliq H.
    Genereux, Brad M.
    Govil, Amit
    Holland, Edward J.
    CORNEA, 2018, 37 (11) : 1395 - 1399
  • [5] Cincinnati Protocol for Preoperative Screening and Donor Selection for Ocular Surface Stem Cell Transplantation
    Cheung, Albert Y.
    Sarnicola, Enrica
    Kurji, Khaliq H.
    Govil, Amit
    Mogilishetty, Gautham
    Eslani, Medi
    Wright, Elizabeth
    Brailey, Paul
    Holland, Edward J.
    CORNEA, 2018, 37 (09) : 1192 - 1197
  • [6] Systemic Immunosuppression in Ocular Surface Stem Cell Transplantation: Results of a 10-Year Experience
    Holland, Edward J.
    Mogilishetty, Gautham
    Skeens, Heather M.
    Hair, David B.
    Neff, Kristiana D.
    Biber, Joseph M.
    Chan, Clara C.
    CORNEA, 2012, 31 (06) : 655 - 661
  • [7] Adnexal Surgery in Patients Undergoing Ocular Surface Stem Cell Transplantation
    deSousa, Jean-Louis
    Daya, Sheraz
    Malhotra, Raman
    OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2009, 116 (02) : 235 - 242
  • [8] Current and future options for ocular surface reconstruction, including ocular surface stem cell transplantation (limbal stem cell transplantation)
    Cheung, Albert Y.
    Sarnicola, Enrica
    Arias, Diego E.
    EXPERT REVIEW OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2024, 19 (05) : 341 - 355
  • [9] Outcomes and Complications of Limbal Stem Cell Allograft Transplantation
    Li, Jennifer Y.
    Cortina, Maria S.
    Greiner, Mark A.
    Kuo, Anthony N.
    Miller, Darby D.
    Shtein, Roni M.
    Veldman, Peter B.
    Yin, Jia
    Kim, Stephen J.
    Shen, Joanne F.
    OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2024, 131 (09) : 1121 - 1131
  • [10] Outcomes of Penetrating Keratoplasty Following Autologous Cultivated Limbal Epithelial Stem Cell Transplantation
    Figueiredo, Gustavo S.
    Salvador-Culla, Borja
    Baylis, Oliver J.
    Mudhar, Hardeep S.
    Lako, Majlinda
    Figueiredo, Francisco C.
    STEM CELLS, 2018, 36 (06) : 925 - 931