Evaluation and comparison of a methylated teicoplanin aglycone to teicoplanin aglycone and natural teicoplanin chiral stationary phases

被引:39
作者
Xiao, TL
Tesarova, E
Anderson, JL
Egger, M
Armstrong, DW [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas, Dept Chem & Biochem, Arlington, TX 76019 USA
[2] Pfizer, St Louis Labs Q3A, Chesterfield, MO USA
[3] Charles Univ Prague, Dept Phys & Macromol Chem, Fac Sci, Prague, Czech Republic
[4] Univ Toledo, Dept Chem, Toledo, OH 43606 USA
[5] Iowa State Univ, Dept Chem, Ames, IA USA
关键词
chiral stationary phases; enantiomer separation; HPLC; macrocyclic glycopeptide; methylation;
D O I
10.1002/jssc.200500332
中图分类号
O65 [分析化学];
学科分类号
070302 ; 081704 ;
摘要
HPLC enantiomeric separations of a wide variety of racemic analytes was evaluated using chiral stationary phases (CSPs) based on the macrocyclic glycopeptides teicoplanin (T), teicoplanin aglycone (TAG), and methylated teicoplanin aglycone (Me-TAG) in two different mobile phase modes, i.e., the RP mode and the polar organic (PO) mode. Comparison of the enantiomeric separations using Chirobiotic T, Chirobiotic TAG, and the methylated form of TAG were conducted in order to gain a better understanding of the roles of the polar functional groups on the CSP. Substantial effects due to the cleavage of saccharides and/or methylation on chiral separations were observed in both separation modes. Improved separation efficiencies for many acidic analytes were obtained by methylating the H-bonding groups of TAG. These groups were believed to be a contributing factor to band broadening on TAG due to their negative effect on mass transfer between the stationary phase and mobile phase. Ionic/dipolar interactions between the carboxylate group of the analytes and the amine groups on T, TAG, or Me-TAG are important for chiral discrimination. Therefore, analytes possessing a carboxyl group are good candidates for successful separations on these CSPs. Hydrophobic interactions are important for enantiomeric separations in the RP mode where the H-bonding interactions between analytes and the chiral selectors are relatively weak. Me-TAG offers higher hydrophobicity, which can accentuate the interactions of analytes with hydrophobic moieties, but these interactions are not necessarily stereoselective. In the PO mobile phase, electrostatic/dipolar interactions between polar functional groups are the dominating interactions in chiral recognition. Another important factor is steric fit, which could be changed with every modification of the T structure. Therefore, substantial changes of enantioseparations were obtained within this studied group of CSPs. The PO mode was shown to be the most powerful mobile phase mode for enantiomeric separations on T-based stationary phases, mainly due to the improved efficiency. Methylation of the TAG proved to be a very useful tool for investigating the chiral recognition mechanism for this group of chiral selectors.
引用
收藏
页码:429 / 445
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]   Enantioseparation of dipeptides by capillary electrochromatography on a teicoplanin aglycone chiral stationary phase [J].
Schmid, MG ;
Grobuschek, N ;
Pessenhofer, V ;
Klostius, A ;
Gübitz, G .
JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A, 2003, 990 (1-2) :83-90
[2]   Evaluation and Comparison of m-Tolyl Isocyanate Teicoplanin and Teicoplanin Chiral Stationary Phase [J].
Shen Baochun ;
Yuan Jianyong ;
Xu Beijia ;
Xu Xiuzhu .
ACTA CHIMICA SINICA, 2009, 67 (17) :2005-2012
[3]   Effect of temperature on retention and enantiomeric separation of chiral sulfoxides using teicoplanin aglycone chiral stationary phase [J].
Mericko, D ;
Lehotay, J ;
Skacáni, I ;
Armstrong, DW .
JOURNAL OF LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY & RELATED TECHNOLOGIES, 2006, 29 (05) :623-638
[4]   Evaluation of Dalbavancin as Chiral Selector for HPLC and Comparison with Teicoplanin-Based Chiral Stationary Phases [J].
Zhang, Xiaotong ;
Bao, Ye ;
Huang, Ke ;
Barnett-Rundlett, Kimber L. ;
Armstrong, Daniel W. .
CHIRALITY, 2010, 22 (05) :495-513
[5]   Thermodynamic Approach to Enantioseparation of Aryl-Methyl Sulfoxides on Teicoplanin Aglycone Stationary Phase [J].
Mericko, D. ;
Lehotay, J. ;
Skacani, I. ;
Armstrong, D. W. .
JOURNAL OF LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY & RELATED TECHNOLOGIES, 2009, 32 (03) :331-347
[6]   Enantioseparation of semisynthetic ergot alkaloids on vancomycin and teicoplanin stationary phases [J].
Tesarová, E ;
Záruba, K ;
Flieger, M .
JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A, 1999, 844 (1-2) :137-147
[7]   Enantioselective ion-exclusion chromatography on teicoplanin aglycone and (+)-(18-crown-6)-2,3,11,12-tetracarboxylic acid stationary phases [J].
Steffeck, RJ ;
Zelechonok, Y .
JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A, 2003, 983 (1-2) :91-100
[8]   Study of the mechanism of enantioseparation.: VII.: Effect of temperature on retention of some enantiomers of phenylcarbamic acid derivates on a teicoplanin aglycone chiral stationary phase [J].
Rojkovicová, T ;
Lehotay, J ;
Krupcík, J ;
Fedurcová, A ;
Cizmárik, J ;
Armstrong, DW .
JOURNAL OF LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY & RELATED TECHNOLOGIES, 2004, 27 (11) :1653-1670
[9]   Comparative study of three teicoplanin-based chiral stationary phases using the linear free energy relationship model [J].
Lokajová, J ;
Tesarová, E ;
Armstrong, DW .
JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A, 2005, 1088 (1-2) :57-66
[10]   Evaluation of the macrocyclic glycopeptide A-40,926 as a high-performance liquid chromatographic chiral selector and comparison with teicoplanin chiral stationary phase [J].
Berthod, A ;
Yu, T ;
Kullman, JP ;
Armstrong, DW ;
Gasparrini, F ;
D'Acquarica, I ;
Misiti, D ;
Carotti, A .
JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A, 2000, 897 (1-2) :113-129