Ruffe Length-Weight Relationships with a Proposed Standard Weight Equation

被引:23
作者
Ogle, Derek H. [1 ]
Winfield, Ian J. [2 ]
机构
[1] Northland Coll, Ashland, WI 54806 USA
[2] Lancaster Environm Ctr, Ctr Ecol & Hydrol, Lancaster LA1 4AP, Lancs, England
基金
英国自然环境研究理事会;
关键词
VENDACE COREGONUS-ALBULA; PERCH PERCA-FLUVIATILIS; GYMNOCEPHALUS-CERNUUS; RELATIVE WEIGHT; CONDITION INDEXES; PROXIMATE COMPOSITION; LAKE-SUPERIOR; FISH; POPULATIONS; COMPETITION;
D O I
10.1577/M08-176.1
中图分类号
S9 [水产、渔业];
学科分类号
0908 ;
摘要
Ruffe Gymnocephalus cernuus length-weight data from 141 data sets were obtained from a variety of waters across Europe and the Laurentian Great Lakes for summarization and development of standard weight (W(s)) equations. The mean slopes of the length-weight relationships from all populations and for all percentiles except the 95th percentile were not different from 3.0, suggesting that ruffe growth is generally isometric. The W(s) equations developed using the regression line percentile, linear empirical percentile (EmP), and Froese's methods exhibited length-related biases. The quadratic EmP W(s) equations for the 75th and 50th percentiles did not exhibit length-related biases and thus can be used to compute the relative weight of ruffe. The EmP 75th percentile W(s) equation was log(10)(W(s75)) = -2.5800 + 0.6210.log(10)(total length, TL) + 0.6073.[log(10)(TL)](2), and the 50th percentile W(s) equation was log(10)(W(s50)) = -3.3524 + 1.3969.log(10)(TL) + 0.4054.[log(10)(TL)](2) when constrained to ruffe between 55 and 205 mm TL. We propose that the minimum TL for a five-cell length categorization system used to compute stock indices for ruffe be 55, 90, 120, 140, and 175 mm TL. These results provide a method for computing relative weight indices for typical (50th percentile) and above-average (75th percentile) ruffe; this method will allow comparisons of body condition across time, among habitats, among bodies of water, and among length categories.
引用
收藏
页码:850 / 858
页数:9
相关论文
共 57 条
[1]   SHIFT IN PIKE, ESOX-LUCIUS L, PREDATION PRESSURE FOLLOWING THE INTRODUCTION OF RUFFE, GYMNOCEPHALUS-CERNUUS (L) TO LOCH LOMOND [J].
ADAMS, CE .
JOURNAL OF FISH BIOLOGY, 1991, 38 (05) :663-667
[2]  
[Anonymous], N AM J FISH MANAGE, DOI DOI 10.1577/1548-8659(1984)4<273:ALSTAF>2.0.C0
[3]  
2
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2021, R foundation for statistical computing Computer software
[5]  
[Anonymous], QUANTREG QUANTILE RE
[6]  
Bister Timothy J., 2000, North American Journal of Fisheries Management, V20, P570, DOI 10.1577/1548-8675(2000)020<0570:PSWWSE>2.3.CO
[7]  
2
[8]  
Blackwell Brian G., 2000, Reviews in Fisheries Science, V8, P1, DOI 10.1080/10641260091129161
[9]   Fish community changes in the St. Louis River estuary, Lake Superior, 1989-1996: Is it ruffe or population dynamics? [J].
Bronte, CR ;
Evrard, LM ;
Brown, WP ;
Mayo, KR ;
Edwards, AJ .
JOURNAL OF GREAT LAKES RESEARCH, 1998, 24 (02) :309-318
[10]  
Brown Michael L., 1996, North American Journal of Fisheries Management, V16, P427, DOI 10.1577/1548-8675(1996)016<0427:MBSOAM>2.3.CO