The promise and challenges of utility-scale compressed air energy storage in aquifers

被引:34
|
作者
Guo, Chaobin [1 ]
Li, Cai [2 ]
Zhang, Keni [3 ]
Cai, Zuansi [4 ]
Ma, Tianran [5 ]
Maggi, Federico [2 ]
Gan, Yixiang [2 ]
El-Zein, Abbas [2 ]
Pan, Zhejun [6 ]
Shen, Luming [2 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Geol Sci, Beijing 100037, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Sydney, Sch Civil Engn, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
[3] Jinan Univ, Inst Groundwater & Earth Sci, Guangzhou, Peoples R China
[4] Edinburgh Napier Univ, Sch Engn & Built Environm, Edinburgh EH10 5DT, Midlothian, Scotland
[5] China Univ Min & Technol, Sch Mech & Civil Engn, Xuzhou 221116, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[6] CSIRO Energy, Private Bag 10, Clayton, Vic 3169, Australia
基金
中国国家自然科学基金; 澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
Compressed air energy storage; Aquifers; Storage efficiency; Pittsfield test; Iowa Stored Energy Plant Agency project; PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT; DYNAMIC SIMULATION; SALINE AQUIFERS; EXERGY ANALYSIS; SYSTEM; CAES; GAS; PERMEABILITY; FEASIBILITY; SHALE;
D O I
10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.116513
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Widely distributed aquifers have been proposed as effective storage reservoirs for compressed air energy storage (CAES). This aims to overcome the limitations of geological conditions for conventional utility-scale CAES, which has to date used caverns as the storage reservoirs. As a promising technology, compressed air energy storage in aquifers (CAESA) has received increasing attention as a potential method to deal with the intermittent nature of solar or wind energy sources. This article presents a selective review of theoretical and numerical modeling studies as well as field tests, along with efficiency and economic analyses, to assess the feasibility of the emerging technology. Although some field tests suggest that a large bubble could be created in aquifers to sustain the working cycles at target rates, challenges remain before the technology can be recommended for wide deployment. The geological critical safety factors affecting the gas bubble development and sustainability of operation cycles include the geological structure, aquifer depth, and hydrodynamic and mechanical properties, such as porosity, permeability, compressibility, and mineral composition. Moreover, the injection/withdrawal well configurations and oxidation reactions caused by the oxygen in compressed air should also be considered. The failed attempt of renewable energy combined with CAESA in Iowa is described and the lessons learned are summarized. Combining CAESA with thermal storage, using CO2 as cushion gas, horizontal wells or hydraulic fracturing, and man-made boundaries are proposed to improve CAESA efficiency but need further study for future applications.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Numerical investigation of cycle performance in compressed air energy storage in aquifers
    Yang, Lichao
    Cai, Zuansi
    Li, Cai
    He, Qingcheng
    Ma, Yan
    Guo, Chaobin
    APPLIED ENERGY, 2020, 269
  • [2] Controllable and affordable utility-scale electricity from intermittent wind resources and compressed air energy storage (CAES)
    Cavallo, Alfred
    ENERGY, 2007, 32 (02) : 120 - 127
  • [3] Numerical investigation of a joint approach to thermal energy storage and compressed air energy storage in aquifers
    Guo, Chaobin
    Zhang, Keni
    Pan, Lehua
    Cai, Zuansi
    Li, Cai
    Li, Yi
    APPLIED ENERGY, 2017, 203 : 948 - 958
  • [4] Modelling studies for influence factors of gas bubble in compressed air energy storage in aquifers
    Guo, Chaobin
    Zhang, Keni
    Li, Cai
    Wang, Xiaoyu
    ENERGY, 2016, 107 : 48 - 59
  • [5] The underground performance analysis of compressed air energy storage in aquifers through field testing
    Li, Yi
    Wang, Hao
    Wang, Jinsheng
    Hu, Litang
    Wu, Xiaohua
    Yang, Yabin
    Gai, Peng
    Liu, Yaning
    Li, Yi
    APPLIED ENERGY, 2024, 366
  • [6] Coupled nonlinear wellbore multiphase flow and thermo-hydro-mechanical analysis of compressed air energy storage in aquifers
    Li, Yi
    Zhou, Qian
    Yu, Hao
    Li, Yi
    Liu, Yinjiang
    Huang, Leqing
    Tang, Dong
    Zhang, Guijin
    Liu, Yaning
    APPLIED ENERGY, 2025, 377
  • [7] A comparison of compressed carbon dioxide energy storage and compressed air energy storage in aquifers using numerical methods
    Li, Yi
    Yu, Hao
    Tang, Dong
    Li, Yi
    Zhang, Guijin
    Liu, Yaning
    RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2022, 187 : 1130 - 1153
  • [8] Compressed air energy storage in aquifers: basic principles, considerable factors, and improvement approaches
    Li, Yi
    Li, Yi
    Liu, Yaning
    Cao, Xiaoyuan
    REVIEWS IN CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 2021, 37 (05) : 561 - 584
  • [9] Comparison of compressed air energy storage process in aquifers and caverns based on the Huntorf CAES plant
    Guo, Chaobin
    Pan, Lehua
    Zhang, Keni
    Oldenburg, Curtis M.
    Li, Cai
    Li, Yi
    APPLIED ENERGY, 2016, 181 : 342 - 356
  • [10] Numerical Investigation of the Influences of Wellbore Flow on Compressed Air Energy Storage in Aquifers
    Li, Yi
    Zhang, Keni
    Hu, Litang
    Wang, Jinsheng
    GEOFLUIDS, 2017,