The promise and challenges of utility-scale compressed air energy storage in aquifers

被引:39
作者
Guo, Chaobin [1 ]
Li, Cai [2 ]
Zhang, Keni [3 ]
Cai, Zuansi [4 ]
Ma, Tianran [5 ]
Maggi, Federico [2 ]
Gan, Yixiang [2 ]
El-Zein, Abbas [2 ]
Pan, Zhejun [6 ]
Shen, Luming [2 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Geol Sci, Beijing 100037, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Sydney, Sch Civil Engn, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
[3] Jinan Univ, Inst Groundwater & Earth Sci, Guangzhou, Peoples R China
[4] Edinburgh Napier Univ, Sch Engn & Built Environm, Edinburgh EH10 5DT, Midlothian, Scotland
[5] China Univ Min & Technol, Sch Mech & Civil Engn, Xuzhou 221116, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[6] CSIRO Energy, Private Bag 10, Clayton, Vic 3169, Australia
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会; 中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Compressed air energy storage; Aquifers; Storage efficiency; Pittsfield test; Iowa Stored Energy Plant Agency project; PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT; DYNAMIC SIMULATION; SALINE AQUIFERS; EXERGY ANALYSIS; SYSTEM; CAES; GAS; PERMEABILITY; FEASIBILITY; SHALE;
D O I
10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.116513
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Widely distributed aquifers have been proposed as effective storage reservoirs for compressed air energy storage (CAES). This aims to overcome the limitations of geological conditions for conventional utility-scale CAES, which has to date used caverns as the storage reservoirs. As a promising technology, compressed air energy storage in aquifers (CAESA) has received increasing attention as a potential method to deal with the intermittent nature of solar or wind energy sources. This article presents a selective review of theoretical and numerical modeling studies as well as field tests, along with efficiency and economic analyses, to assess the feasibility of the emerging technology. Although some field tests suggest that a large bubble could be created in aquifers to sustain the working cycles at target rates, challenges remain before the technology can be recommended for wide deployment. The geological critical safety factors affecting the gas bubble development and sustainability of operation cycles include the geological structure, aquifer depth, and hydrodynamic and mechanical properties, such as porosity, permeability, compressibility, and mineral composition. Moreover, the injection/withdrawal well configurations and oxidation reactions caused by the oxygen in compressed air should also be considered. The failed attempt of renewable energy combined with CAESA in Iowa is described and the lessons learned are summarized. Combining CAESA with thermal storage, using CO2 as cushion gas, horizontal wells or hydraulic fracturing, and man-made boundaries are proposed to improve CAESA efficiency but need further study for future applications.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 119 条
[1]  
Acien FG., 2020, ENERGY CONVERS MANAG, V210, P9
[2]   Assessment of geological resource potential for compressed air energy storage in global electricity supply [J].
Aghahosseini, Arman ;
Breyer, Christian .
ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2018, 169 :161-173
[3]  
Allen R.D., 1983, Factors Affecting Storage of Compressed Air in Porous Rock Reservoirs
[4]  
Allen R.D., 1981, PNLSA9447
[5]  
Allen RD., 1985, Summary of selected compressed air energy storage studies
[6]  
Alrobaian AA., 2020, ENERGY, V197, P13
[7]  
Amirlatifi A, 2019, ELECT VEHICLES DRIVI, P1
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2008, Morgan Stanley Research report on hedge fund and mutual fund redemptions
[9]   A review of pumped hydro energy storage development in significant international electricity markets [J].
Barbour, Edward ;
Wilson, I. A. Grant ;
Radcliffe, Jonathan ;
Ding, Yulong ;
Li, Yongliang .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2016, 61 :421-432
[10]   Adiabatic Compressed Air Energy Storage with packed bed thermal energy storage [J].
Barbour, Edward ;
Mignard, Dimitri ;
Ding, Yulong ;
Li, Yongliang .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2015, 155 :804-815