Towards a standard technique for soil quality assessment

被引:90
作者
Obade, Vincent de Paul [1 ]
Lal, Rattan [1 ]
机构
[1] Ohio State Univ, Carbon Management & Sequestrat Ctr, Sch Environm & Nat Resources, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
关键词
Land management practices; Partial least squares regression; Soil quality index; VARIABLE SELECTION METHODS; LAND MANAGEMENT; INDICATORS; FRAMEWORK; TILLAGE; IMPACTS; INDEX;
D O I
10.1016/j.geoderma.2015.11.023
中图分类号
S15 [土壤学];
学科分类号
0903 ; 090301 ;
摘要
A soil quality index (SQI) that integrates key soil attribute information would be beneficial in minimizing spillover effects of indiscriminate soil management such as shortages in food, water, energy and abate adverse repercussions of climate change. In this study, a new SQI that synthesizes soil attributes is developed using partial least squares regression (PLSR), and compared with crop yields. The field data were acquired in the year 2013 from 5 different on-farm sites within Ohio, USA that were under Natural Vegetation (NV), No-Till (NT), and Conventional Till (CT) management. The data shows that P-w (Pewamo silty clay loam) soil under NV land use had a higher quality, than GWA (Glynwood silt loam), kbA (Kibbie fine sandy loam), CrA (Crosby silt loam), and CtA (Crosby Celina silt loams) soil; whereas CT managed soil had P-w > CrA > kbA > CtA > GWA. The soil bulk density (rho(b)), electrical conductivity (EC), available water capacity (AWC) and soil organic carbon (SOC) greatly influenced the SQI especially at the soil surface. The SQI and yield were highly correlated, with that for corn (Zea mays L.) being 64%; whereas soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr.) was 100%. This finding is of special relevance because it explicates the interconnection between on-farm soil quality vis-vis crop yields by objectively blending soil attributes from different management scenarios and soil layers. Future research will investigate techniques for integrating this SQI with socio-economic indicators of agro-ecosystem sustainability. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:96 / 102
页数:7
相关论文
共 55 条
[1]   A comparison of soil quality indexing methods for vegetable production systems in Northern California [J].
Andrews, SS ;
Karlen, DL ;
Mitchell, JP .
AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT, 2002, 90 (01) :25-45
[2]  
Andrews SS, 2001, ECOL APPL, V11, P1573, DOI 10.1890/1051-0761(2001)011[1573:DASQAT]2.0.CO
[3]  
2
[4]   The soil management assessment framework: A quantitative soil quality evaluation method [J].
Andrews, SS ;
Karlen, DL ;
Cambardella, CA .
SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL, 2004, 68 (06) :1945-1962
[5]   On-farm assessment of soil quality in California's central valley [J].
Andrews, SS ;
Mitchell, JP ;
Mancinelli, R ;
Karlen, DL ;
Hartz, TK ;
Horwath, WR ;
Pettygrove, GS ;
Scow, KM ;
Munk, DS .
AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 2002, 94 (01) :12-23
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2015, PROGR SANITATION DRI
[7]  
[Anonymous], SOIL QUAL CONC
[8]   Uni and multivariate analyses of soil physical quality indicators of a Cambisol from Apodi Plateau - CE, Brazil [J].
Anunciato Mota, Jaedson Claudio ;
Oliveira Alves, Carlos Vitor ;
Freire, Alcione Guimaraes ;
de Assis Junior, Raimundo Nonato .
SOIL & TILLAGE RESEARCH, 2014, 140 :66-73
[9]   Developing a soil quality index to compare soil fitness for agricultural use under different managements in the Mediterranean environment [J].
Armenise, E. ;
Redmile-Gordon, M. A. ;
Stellacci, A. M. ;
Ciccarese, A. ;
Rubino, P. .
SOIL & TILLAGE RESEARCH, 2013, 130 :91-98
[10]   Identifying critical limits for soil quality indicators in agro-ecosystems [J].
Arshad, MA ;
Martin, S .
AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT, 2002, 88 (02) :153-160