Game theory approach to optimal design of shale gas supply chains with consideration of economics and life cycle greenhouse gas emissions

被引:46
|
作者
Gao, Jiyao [1 ]
You, Fengqi [1 ]
机构
[1] Cornell Univ, Robert Frederick Smith Sch Chem Engn & Biomol Eng, Ithaca, NY 14853 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
shale gas; non-cooperative supply chain; life cycle GHG emissions; MIBLP; WATER MANAGEMENT; NATURAL-GAS; MULTIOBJECTIVE OPTIMIZATION; ENVIRONMENTAL-IMPACT; GLOBAL OPTIMIZATION; SUSTAINABLE DESIGN; FRAMEWORK; MODEL; COORDINATION; UNCERTAINTY;
D O I
10.1002/aic.15605
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
This article addresses the optimal design of a non-cooperative shale gas supply chain based on a game theory approach. Instead of assuming a single stakeholder as in centralized models, we consider different stakeholders, including the upstream shale gas producer and the midstream shale gas processor. Following the Stackelberg game, the shale gas producer is identified as the leader, whose objectives include maximizing its net present value (NPV) and minimizing the life cycle greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. The shale gas processor is identified as the follower that takes actions after the leader to maximize its own NPV. The resulting problem is a multiobjective mixed-integer bilevel linear programming problem, which cannot be solved directly using any off-the-shelf optimization solvers. Therefore, an efficient projection-based reformulation and decomposition algorithm is further presented. Based on a case study of the Marcellus shale play, the non-cooperative model not only captures the interactions between stakeholders but also provides more realistic solutions. (c) 2017 American Institute of Chemical Engineers AIChE J, 63: 2671-2693, 2017
引用
收藏
页码:2671 / 2693
页数:23
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Techno-economic and life cycle greenhouse gas emissions assessment of liquefied natural gas supply chain in China
    Zhang, Jinrui
    Meerman, Hans
    Benders, Rene
    Faaij, Andre
    ENERGY, 2021, 224
  • [32] Greenhouse gas emissions in the nuclear life cycle: A balanced appraisal
    Beerten, Jef
    Laes, Erik
    Meskens, Gaston
    D'haeseleer, William
    ENERGY POLICY, 2009, 37 (12) : 5056 - 5068
  • [33] Life cycle greenhouse gas emissions in California rice production
    Brodt, Sonja
    Kendall, Alissa
    Moharnmadi, Yaser
    Arslan, Aslihan
    Yuan, Juhong
    Lee, In-Sung
    Linquist, Bruce
    FIELD CROPS RESEARCH, 2014, 169 : 89 - 98
  • [34] REASSESSMENT OF LIFE CYCLE GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS FOR SOYBEAN BIODIESEL
    Pradhan, A.
    Shrestha, D. S.
    Van Gerpen, J.
    McAloon, A.
    Yee, W.
    Haas, M.
    Duffield, J. A.
    TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASABE, 2012, 55 (06) : 2257 - 2264
  • [35] Assessment of the life cycle greenhouse gas emissions in the food industry
    Moresi, Mauro
    AGRO FOOD INDUSTRY HI-TECH, 2014, 25 (03): : 53 - 62
  • [36] Life cycle emissions of greenhouse gas for ammonia scrubbing technology
    Wang, Shujuan
    Liu, Fang
    Chen, Changhe
    Xu, Xuchang
    KOREAN JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 2007, 24 (03) : 495 - 498
  • [37] Life cycle emissions of greenhouse gas for ammonia scrubbing technology
    Shujuan Wang
    Fang Liu
    Changhe Chen
    Xuchang Xu
    Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering, 2007, 24 : 495 - 498
  • [38] Life Cycle Greenhouse Gas Emissions of Nuclear Electricity Generation
    Warner, Ethan S.
    Heath, Garvin A.
    JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ECOLOGY, 2012, 16 : S73 - S92
  • [39] Aggregation and Allocation of Greenhouse Gas Emissions in Oil and Gas Production: Implications for Life-Cycle Greenhouse Gas Burdens
    Chen, Qining
    Dunn, Jennifer B.
    Allen, David T.
    ACS SUSTAINABLE CHEMISTRY & ENGINEERING, 2019, 7 (20): : 17065 - 17073
  • [40] Life-cycle energy consumption and greenhouse-gas emissions of hydrogen supply chains for fuel-cell vehicles in China
    Ren, Lei
    Zhou, Sheng
    Ou, Xunmin
    ENERGY, 2020, 209