Game theory approach to optimal design of shale gas supply chains with consideration of economics and life cycle greenhouse gas emissions

被引:46
|
作者
Gao, Jiyao [1 ]
You, Fengqi [1 ]
机构
[1] Cornell Univ, Robert Frederick Smith Sch Chem Engn & Biomol Eng, Ithaca, NY 14853 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
shale gas; non-cooperative supply chain; life cycle GHG emissions; MIBLP; WATER MANAGEMENT; NATURAL-GAS; MULTIOBJECTIVE OPTIMIZATION; ENVIRONMENTAL-IMPACT; GLOBAL OPTIMIZATION; SUSTAINABLE DESIGN; FRAMEWORK; MODEL; COORDINATION; UNCERTAINTY;
D O I
10.1002/aic.15605
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
This article addresses the optimal design of a non-cooperative shale gas supply chain based on a game theory approach. Instead of assuming a single stakeholder as in centralized models, we consider different stakeholders, including the upstream shale gas producer and the midstream shale gas processor. Following the Stackelberg game, the shale gas producer is identified as the leader, whose objectives include maximizing its net present value (NPV) and minimizing the life cycle greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. The shale gas processor is identified as the follower that takes actions after the leader to maximize its own NPV. The resulting problem is a multiobjective mixed-integer bilevel linear programming problem, which cannot be solved directly using any off-the-shelf optimization solvers. Therefore, an efficient projection-based reformulation and decomposition algorithm is further presented. Based on a case study of the Marcellus shale play, the non-cooperative model not only captures the interactions between stakeholders but also provides more realistic solutions. (c) 2017 American Institute of Chemical Engineers AIChE J, 63: 2671-2693, 2017
引用
收藏
页码:2671 / 2693
页数:23
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Uncertainties in Life Cycle Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Advanced Biomass Feedstock Logistics Supply Chains in Kansas
    Nguyen, Long
    Cafferty, Kara G.
    Searcy, Erin M.
    Spatari, Sabrina
    ENERGIES, 2014, 7 (11): : 7125 - 7146
  • [12] Ship life cycle greenhouse gas emissions
    Chatzinikolaou S.
    Ventikos N.
    Bilgili L.
    Celebi U.B.
    Chatzinikolaou, Stefanos (stefanos.chatzinikolaou@rina.org), 1600, Springer Verlag (PartF2): : 883 - 895
  • [13] Optimal greenhouse gas emissions in NGCC plants integrating life cycle assessment
    Bernier, Etienne
    Marechal, Francois
    Samson, Rejean
    ENERGY, 2012, 37 (01) : 639 - 648
  • [14] An Assessment of Life Cycle Greenhouse Gas Emissions Associated With the Use of Water, Sand, and Chemicals in Shale Gas Production of the Pennsylvania Marcellus Shale
    Sibrizzi, Christopher
    LaPuma, Peter
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH, 2016, 79 (04) : 8 - 15
  • [15] Sustainable design and operations of shale gas supply chains using integrated hybrid life cycle optimization models
    Gao J.
    You F.
    1723, Italian Association of Chemical Engineering - AIDIC (70): : 1723 - 1728
  • [16] Assessing the life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of biorefineries
    Sokka, Laura
    Soimakallio, Sampo
    LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT OF PRODUCTS AND TECHNOLOGIES, 2009, 262 : 17 - 26
  • [17] Life Cycle Greenhouse Gas Emissions of Anesthetic Drugs
    Sherman, Jodi
    Le, Cathy
    Lamers, Vanessa
    Eckelman, Matthew
    ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2012, 114 (05): : 1086 - 1090
  • [18] Life cycle greenhouse gas emissions and freshwater consumption of liquefied Marcellus shale gas used for international power generation
    Mallapragada, Dharik S.
    Reyes-Bastida, Eric
    Roberto, Frank
    McElroy, Erin M.
    Veskovic, Dejan
    Laurenzi, Ian J.
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2018, 205 : 672 - 680
  • [19] Life-Cycle Greenhouse Gas Emissions of Shale Gas, Natural Gas, Coal, and Petroleum (vol 46, pg 619, 2012)
    Burnham, Andrew
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2012, 46 (04) : 2482 - 2482
  • [20] A Simplified Life Cycle Approach for Assessing Greenhouse Gas Emissions of Wind Electricity
    Padey, Pierryves
    Blanc, Isabelle
    Le Boulch, Denis
    Zhao, Xiusheng
    JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ECOLOGY, 2012, 16 : S28 - S38