Fuzzy optimization model for earthwork allocations with imprecise parameters

被引:32
|
作者
Karimi, Shahram Mohamad [1 ]
Mousavi, Seyed Jamshid
Kaveh, Ali
Afshar, Abbas
机构
[1] Iran Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Civil Engn, Tehran, Iran
[2] Amirkabir Univ Technol Tehran Polytech, Dept Civil Engn, Tehran, Iran
关键词
earthwork; optimization; uncertainty principles; fuzzy sets; computer programming; parameters;
D O I
10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2007)133:2(181)
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Existing linear programming (LP) models of earthwork allocations in roadway construction assume that unit cost coefficients of earthwork activities and borrow pits/disposal sites capacities are certain and deterministic numbers. However in real-world problems there are naturally some uncertainties inherited in these values, which make it difficult to represent a single value as the candidate of entire possible values. This paper presents a fuzzy linear programming (FLP) model of earthwork allocations based on the fact of assuming unit cost coefficients and borrow pits/disposal sites capacities as fuzzy numbers while minimizing total earth-moving cost as an objective function. A method based on alpha cuts of a fuzzy set is used to take the uncertainty in borrow pits/disposal sites capacities into account. The uncertainty in fuzzy cost coefficients of the objective function and its effects on decision variables of the earthwork allocations model are also considered using the method presented by Chanas and Kuchta in 1994. Subsequently, a more general model is suggested which considers both uncertainties in borrow pits/disposal sites capacities and cost coefficients simultaneously. It is demonstrated that the presented FLP. compared to a deterministic LP, introduces a more robust solution; as the result of giving fuzziness to the uncertain parameters. Such a solution could be beneficial in real world decision making where uncertainties on resources and activities cost exist.
引用
收藏
页码:181 / 190
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Sustainable Irrigation Planning with Imprecise Parameters under Fuzzy Environment
    Regulwar, D. G.
    Gurav, Jyotiba B.
    WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT, 2012, 26 (13) : 3871 - 3892
  • [2] Sustainable Irrigation Planning with Imprecise Parameters under Fuzzy Environment
    D. G. Regulwar
    Jyotiba B. Gurav
    Water Resources Management, 2012, 26 : 3871 - 3892
  • [3] Two-Phase Earthwork Optimization Model for Highway Construction
    Bogenberger, Christian
    Dell'Amico, Mauro
    Fuellerer, Guenther
    Hoefinger, Gerhard
    Iori, Manuel
    Novellani, Stefano
    Panicucci, Barbara
    JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT, 2015, 141 (06)
  • [4] Bid-Winning Potential Optimization for Concession Schemes with Imprecise Investment Parameters
    Islam, Md. Mainul
    Mohamed, Sherif
    JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT-ASCE, 2009, 135 (08): : 690 - 700
  • [5] A twofold fuzzy region model for imprecise (duality control of geographic information
    Charlier, Niels
    De Tre, Guy
    Gautama, Sidharta
    Bellens, Rik
    COMPUTATIONAL SCIENCE AND ITS APPLICATIONS - ICCSA 2008, PT 1, PROCEEDINGS, 2008, 5072 : 647 - 662
  • [6] Fuzzy estimates of regression parameters in linear regression models for imprecise input and output data
    Wu, HC
    COMPUTATIONAL STATISTICS & DATA ANALYSIS, 2003, 42 (1-2) : 203 - 217
  • [7] Earthwork optimization system for sustainable highway construction
    Gomes Correia, Antonio
    Parente, Manuel
    Cortez, Paulo
    GEOTECHNICAL SYNERGY IN BUENOS AIRES 2015, 2015, 5 : 121 - 138
  • [8] A novel integrated optimization system for earthwork tasks
    Parente, Manuel
    Correia, Antonio Gomes
    Cortez, Paulo
    TRANSPORT RESEARCH ARENA TRA2016, 2016, 14 : 3601 - 3610
  • [9] Imprecise stochastic orders and fuzzy rankings
    Ignacio Montes
    Enrique Miranda
    Susana Montes
    Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making, 2017, 16 : 297 - 327
  • [10] Imprecise stochastic orders and fuzzy rankings
    Montes, Ignacio
    Miranda, Enrique
    Montes, Susana
    FUZZY OPTIMIZATION AND DECISION MAKING, 2017, 16 (03) : 297 - 327