Comparative analysis of two-step GA-based PV array reconfiguration technique and other reconfiguration techniques

被引:76
作者
Ajmal, Aidha Muhammad [1 ]
Ramachandaramurthy, Vigna K. [1 ]
Naderipour, Amirreza [2 ]
Ekanayake, Janaka B. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tenaga Nas, Coll Engn, Dept Elect Power Engn, Inst Power Engn, Jalan IKRAM UNITEN, Kajang 43000, Selangor, Malaysia
[2] Univ Teknol Malaysia, Fac Engn, Sch Elect Engn, Inst High Voltage & High Current, Skudai 81310, Johor, Malaysia
[3] Univ Peradeniya, Dept Elect & Elect Engn, Galaha Rd, Peradeniya 20400, Sri Lanka
关键词
Photovoltaic; Array reconfiguration; Genetic algorithm; Optimization;
D O I
10.1016/j.enconman.2020.113806
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
Photovoltaic (PV) plants can be exposed to partial shading, which reduces the energy production and causes multi-peaks to form in the Power-Voltage (P-V) curve. As a result, the row currents of the PV modules will not be constant. Several techniques have been proposed to overcome partial shading, such as the static and dynamic reconfiguration techniques, with both aiming to reduce the difference in the row currents to improve energy production. Minimization of the row current via static techniques requires laborious work and extra wiring. On the other hand, dynamic techniques require an extensive monitoring system to support different tasks. Therefore, to improve the power generated from the PV array, this paper suggests a new reconfiguration technique for PV panels using Genetic algorithm (GA) and two main reconfigurable steps based on a switching matrix. In this technique, only the electrical connections of the PV panels are changed while its physical location remains unchanged. To verify the effectiveness of the proposed reconfiguration technique, the system was simulated and tested using MATLAB/SIMULINK software, with four shading patterns. The results were compared with other reconfiguration techniques, namely TCT configuration, competence square (CS), SuDoKu, two-phase array reconfiguration, Genetic algorithm (GA), Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO), and Modified Harris Hawks Optimization (MHHO). The performance of each shading case was also analyzed. Also, a comparative study on performance analysis in real-time application was carried out for each shading pattern. The results prove the superiority of the proposed technique over other techniques for overcoming partial shading.
引用
收藏
页数:21
相关论文
共 51 条
[1]   Static and dynamic reconfiguration approaches for mitigation of partial shading influence in photovoltaic arrays [J].
Ajmal, Aidha Muhammad ;
Babu, Thanikanti Sudhakar ;
Ramachandaramurthy, Vigna K. ;
Yousri, Dalia. ;
Ekanayake, Janaka B. .
SUSTAINABLE ENERGY TECHNOLOGIES AND ASSESSMENTS, 2020, 40 (40)
[2]  
Ajmal AM, 2019, DECEMBER EFFECT PART, P1
[3]   A novel reconfiguration procedure to extract maximum power from partially-shaded photovoltaic arrays [J].
Akrami, Mohammadreza ;
Pourhossein, Kazem .
SOLAR ENERGY, 2018, 173 :110-119
[4]  
Alkahtani M., 2020, J Multidiscip Sci J, V3, P32, DOI [10.3390/j3010005, DOI 10.3390/J3010005]
[5]  
Almaktar M, 2012, 2012 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON POWER AND ENERGY (PECON), P360, DOI 10.1109/PECon.2012.6450238
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2017, P 2017 8 INT RENEWAB
[7]   Particle Swarm Optimization Based Solar PV Array Reconfiguration of the Maximum Power Extraction Under Partial Shading Conditions [J].
Babu, Thanikanti Sudhakar ;
Ram, J. Prasanth ;
Dragicevic, Tomislav ;
Miyatake, Masafumi ;
Blaabjerg, Frede ;
Rajasekar, Natarajan .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SUSTAINABLE ENERGY, 2018, 9 (01) :74-85
[8]   A cost-benefit analysis for reconfigurable PV modules under shading [J].
Baka, M. ;
Manganiello, P. ;
Soudris, D. ;
Catthoor, F. .
SOLAR ENERGY, 2019, 178 :69-78
[9]   Analysis and comparison of different PV array configurations under partial shading conditions [J].
Bingol, Okan ;
Ozkaya, Burcin .
SOLAR ENERGY, 2018, 160 :336-343
[10]   Simple and efficient approach to detect and diagnose electrical faults and partial shading in photovoltaic systems [J].
Chaibi, Y. ;
Malvoni, M. ;
Chouder, A. ;
Boussetta, M. ;
Salhi, M. .
ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2019, 196 :330-343