Is Intraarticular Antibiotic Administration Effective in the Treatment of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus?

被引:2
|
作者
Kuyucu, E. [1 ]
Cabuk, H. [2 ]
Guler, Y. [1 ]
Cabuk, F. [3 ]
Kilic, E. [1 ]
Bulbul, M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Istanbul Medipol Univ, Dept Orthoped & Traumatol, Fac Med, Istanbul, Turkey
[2] Istanbul Okmeydani Orthoped & Traumatol Clin, Istanbul, Turkey
[3] Bakirkoy Dr Sadi Konuk Training & Res Hosp, Pathol Clin, Istanbul, Turkey
关键词
arthritis; infectious; methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus; mortality; SEPTIC ARTHRITIS;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
PURPOSE OF THE STUDY Septic arthritis is an infection of joints caused by a pathogenic microorganism. Septic arthritis has a mortality rate of 11-40% when it's not treated properly. The mortality rate with methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) is 5-7%, while the rate with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is 13-20%. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effects of intraarticular vancomycin and teicoplanin on joint cartilage in in vivo settings and its utility in routine MRSA treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS In our study, 35 male Sprague-Dawley rats aged 28 days were used. Rats were obtained from the Regenerative and Restorative Medicine Research Center (REMER) of Istanbul Medipol University. Rats were randomly divided into 5 groups each containing 7 rats. Joint injections were administered with isoflurane analgesia every day at 6 am. Three rats (15 rats) from each group were sacrified in seventh day and evaluated immunohistologically to evaluate acute healing in articular cartilage. All remaining rats were sacrificed on day 28 and their knees were evaluated by immunohistochemical examination. RESULTS In our study, there were no complications in any rat during injection and the study period. Hematoxylin eosin (H & E) histological staining for evaluating cartilage healing and healing levels did not show statistically significant differences between the groups at first week (p > 0.05). Matrix metalloproteinase-13 (MMP-13) staining did not show any statistically significant difference between the groups. (p > 0.05). DISCUSSION MRSA septic arthritis, diagnosed for the first time in 1960, has recently been responsible for 6-22% of all septic arthritis and is increasing day by day. The use of systemic vancomycin or teicoplanin is the first-line treatment method in MRSA septic arthritis. Serum levels reach the desired level, especially with intravenous infusion dose. On the other hand, it has been shown that intraarticular concentration does not reach a sufficient level in studies conducted. The use of intraarticular antibiotics during treatment can lead to more effective and early disease control by turning this negative situation into favor of the patient. As a result, intraarticular vancomycin and teicoplanin maximale tolerable and maintenance doses can be safely used beside surgery and intravenous antibiotics to increase efficacy of treatment, reduction of recurrence rates and reduction of mortality in MRSA septic arthritis. CONCLUSIONS Intraarticular vancomycin and teicoplanin maximale tolerable and maintenance doses can be safely used beside surgery and intravenous antibiotics to increase efficacy of treatment, reduction of recurrence rates and reduction of mortality in MRSA septic arthritis.
引用
收藏
页码:276 / 280
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Effective antibiotic treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus-associated glomerulonephritis
    Nagaba, Y
    Hiki, Y
    Aoyama, T
    Sano, T
    Matsuo, T
    Shimizu, T
    Tateno, S
    Sakamoto, H
    Kamata, K
    Shigematsu, H
    Higashihara, M
    Kobayashi, Y
    NEPHRON, 2002, 92 (02): : 297 - 303
  • [2] Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in TKA Treated With Revision and Direct Intraarticular Antibiotic Infusion
    Whiteside, Leo A.
    Peppers, Michael
    Nayfeh, Tariq A.
    Roy, Marcel E.
    CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2011, 469 (01) : 26 - 33
  • [3] Combination Antibiotic Treatment of Serious Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Infections
    Davis, J. S.
    Van Hal, S.
    Tong, S. Y. C.
    SEMINARS IN RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2015, 36 (01) : 3 - 16
  • [4] Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus antibiotic resistance and virulence
    Xia, Jufeng
    Gao, Jianjun
    Kokudo, Norihiro
    Hasegawa, Kiyoshi
    Tang, Wei
    BIOSCIENCE TRENDS, 2013, 7 (03) : 113 - 121
  • [5] Treatment of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia
    Choo, Eun Ju
    Chambers, Henry F.
    INFECTION AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 2016, 48 (04): : 267 - 273
  • [6] Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus
    Turner, Evie
    Brownlee, Keith G.
    Denton, Miles
    JOURNAL OF CYSTIC FIBROSIS, 2013, 12 (02) : 184 - 185
  • [7] Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus
    Lee, Andie S.
    de Lencastre, Herminia
    Garau, Javier
    Kluytmans, Jan
    Malhotra-Kumar, Surbhi
    Peschel, Andreas
    Harbarth, Stephan
    NATURE REVIEWS DISEASE PRIMERS, 2018, 4
  • [8] Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus
    Losa, JE
    Barba, R
    Delgado-Iribarren, A
    MEDICINA CLINICA, 2002, 119 (19): : 755 - 756
  • [9] Methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus
    Ellie J. C. Goldstein
    Current Infectious Disease Reports, 2000, 2 (5) : 431 - 432
  • [10] Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus
    Gosbell, IB
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL DERMATOLOGY, 2004, 5 (04) : 239 - 259