What Are We Really Talking About? An Organizing Framework for Types of Consultation and Their Implications for Physician Communication

被引:13
作者
Hale, Andrew J. [1 ,2 ]
Freed, Jason A. [3 ,4 ]
Alston, W. Kemper [2 ,5 ]
Ricotta, Daniel N. [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Vermont, Med Ctr, Burlington, VT 05401 USA
[2] Univ Vermont, Lamer Coll Med, Med, Burlington, VT 05401 USA
[3] Beth Israel Deaconess Med Ctr, Boston, MA 02215 USA
[4] Harvard Med Sch, Med, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[5] Univ Vermont, Med Ctr, Infect Dis, Burlington, VT 05401 USA
关键词
CURBSIDE CONSULTATIONS; INTERNAL-MEDICINE; CARE; RECOMMENDATIONS; ELEMENTS; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1097/ACM.0000000000002659
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Consultation amongst providers is a foundation of modern health care and one of the most frequent means of interdisciplinary communication. Accordingly, clear and efficient communication between providers and across medical specialties during consultation is essential to patient care and a collegial work environment. Traditionally, consultation requests are felt to require a clear question that falls within the purview of the consultant's expertise. However, this narrow constraint is often lacking in the real-world clinical environment and may in fact be detrimental to physician communication and patient care. In this Perspective, the authors propose an organizing framework of seven specific consultation types, which apply broadly across disciplines: ideal, obligatory, procedural, S.O.S., confirmatory, inappropriate, and curbside. The authors describe what factors define each type and the benefits and pitfalls of each. The proposed framework may help providers have more productive, efficient, and collegial conversations about patient care, which may facilitate improved work satisfaction and an enhanced learning environment.
引用
收藏
页码:809 / 812
页数:4
相关论文
共 27 条
  • [1] ASD and ADHD Comorbidity: What Are We Talking About?
    Hours, Camille
    Recasens, Christophe
    Baleyte, Jean-Marc
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHIATRY, 2022, 13
  • [2] Duration of untreated psychosis: What are we talking about?
    Polari, Andrea
    Berk, Michael
    Macneil, Craig
    Conus, Philippe
    ACTA NEUROPSYCHIATRICA, 2009, 21 (03): : 106 - 108
  • [3] Time motion studies in healthcare: What are we talking about?
    Lopetegui, Marcelo
    Yen, Po-Yin
    Lai, Albert
    Jeffries, Joseph
    Embi, Peter
    Payne, Philip
    JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL INFORMATICS, 2014, 49 : 292 - 299
  • [4] Adherence to Lung Cancer Screening: What Exactly Are We Talking About?
    Sakoda, Lori C.
    Henderson, Louise M.
    Rivera, M. Patricia
    ANNALS OF THE AMERICAN THORACIC SOCIETY, 2021, 18 (12) : 1951 - 1952
  • [5] Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing: What Are We Talking About?
    Weaver, Meredith
    Pollin, Toni I.
    JOURNAL OF GENETIC COUNSELING, 2012, 21 (03) : 361 - 366
  • [6] What Can We Really Know about BITs and FDI?
    Kerner, Andrew
    ICSID REVIEW-FOREIGN INVESTMENT LAW JOURNAL, 2018, 33 (01) : 1 - 13
  • [7] Commentary: Non-linearity in LCA - What are we talking about?
    Heijungs, Reinout
    Suh, Sangwon
    FRONTIERS IN SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 3
  • [8] Talking about depression: An analogue study of physician gender and communication style on patient disclosures
    Roter, Debra L.
    Erby, Lori H.
    Adams, Ann
    Buckingham, Christopher D.
    Vail, Laura
    Realpe, Alba
    Larson, Susan
    Hall, Judith A.
    PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2014, 96 (03) : 339 - 345
  • [9] Patient-physician communication about work-related asthma: what we do and do not know
    Mazurek, Jacek M.
    White, Gretchen E.
    Moorman, Jeanne E.
    Storey, Eileen
    ANNALS OF ALLERGY ASTHMA & IMMUNOLOGY, 2015, 114 (02) : 97 - U138
  • [10] Perspective: Total, Added, or Free? What Kind of Sugars Should We Be Talking About?
    Mela, David J.
    Woolner, Elizabeth M.
    ADVANCES IN NUTRITION, 2018, 9 (02) : 63 - 69