Stereotactic radiosurgery planning of vestibular schwannomas: Is MRI at 3 Tesla geometrically accurate?

被引:11
作者
Schmidt, M. A. [1 ]
Wells, E. J. [2 ]
Davison, K. [3 ]
Riddell, A. M. [3 ]
Welsh, L. [4 ]
Saran, F. [4 ]
机构
[1] Royal Marsden NHS Fdn Trust, CR UK & EPSRC Canc Imaging Ctr, Inst Canc Res, Sutton, Surrey, England
[2] Royal Marsden NHS Fdn Trust, Med Phys, London, England
[3] Royal Marsden NHS Fdn Trust, Dept Radiol, London, England
[4] Royal Marsden NHS Fdn Trust, Neurooncol Unit, London, England
关键词
distortion; MRI; Stereotactic Radiosurgery; COMPLETE DISTORTION CORRECTION; ACOUSTIC NEUROMAS; T MRI; RADIOTHERAPY; IMAGES; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.1002/mp.12068
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: MRI is a mandatory requirement to accurately plan Stereotactic Radiosurgery (SRS) for Vestibular Schwannomas. However, MRI may be distorted due not only to inhomogeneity of the static magnetic field and gradients but also due to susceptibility-induced effects, which are more prominent at higher magnetic fields. We assess geometrical distortions around air spaces and consider MRI protocol requirements for SRS planning at 3 T. Methods: Hardware-related distortion and the effect of incorrect shimming were investigated with structured test objects. The magnetic field was mapped over the head on five volunteers to assess susceptibility-related distortion in the naso-oro-pharyngeal cavities (NOPC) and around the internal ear canal (IAC). Results: Hardware-related geometric displacements were found to be less than 0.45 mm within the head volume, after distortion correction. Shimming errors can lead to displacements of up to 4 mm, but errors of this magnitude are unlikely to arise in practice. Susceptibility-related field inhomogeneity was under 3.4 ppm, 2.8 ppm, and 2.7 ppm for the head, NOPC region and IAC region, respectively. For the SRS planning protocol (890 Hz/pixel, approximately 1 mm(3) isotropic), susceptibility-related displacements were less than 0.5 mm (head), and 0.4 mm (IAC and NOPC). Large displacements are possible in MRI examinations undertaken with lower receiver bandwidth values, commonly used in clinical MRI. Higher receiver bandwidth makes the protocol less vulnerable to sub-optimal shimming. The shimming volume and the CT-MR co-registration must be considered jointly. Conclusion: Geometric displacements can be kept under 1 mm in the vicinity of air spaces within the head at 3 T with appropriate setting of the receiver bandwidth, correct shimming and employing distortion correction. (C) 2017 The Authors. Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine.
引用
收藏
页码:375 / 381
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Stereotactic Radiosurgery versus Natural History in Patients with Growing Vestibular Schwannomas
    Tu, Albert
    Gooderham, Peter
    Mick, Paul
    Westerberg, Brian
    Toyota, Brian
    Akagami, Ryojo
    JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGICAL SURGERY PART B-SKULL BASE, 2015, 76 (04) : 286 - 290
  • [32] Repeat stereotactic radiosurgery for progressive vestibular schwannomas after previous radiosurgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Balossier, Anne
    Regis, Jean
    Reyns, Nicolas
    Roche, Pierre-Hugues
    Daniel, Roy Thomas
    George, Mercy
    Faouzi, Mohamed
    Levivier, Marc
    Tuleasca, Constantin
    NEUROSURGICAL REVIEW, 2021, 44 (06) : 3177 - 3188
  • [33] DOSIMETRIC COMPARISON OF HELICAL TOMOTHERAPY AND DYNAMIC CONFORMAL ARC THERAPY IN STEREOTACTIC RADIOSURGERY FOR VESTIBULAR SCHWANNOMAS
    Lee, Tsair-Fwu
    Chao, Pei-Ju
    Wang, Chang-Yu
    Lan, Jen-Hong
    Huang, Yu-Je
    Hsu, Hsuan-Chih
    Sung, Chieh-Cheng
    Su, Te-Jen
    Lian, Shi-Long
    Fang, Fu-Min
    MEDICAL DOSIMETRY, 2011, 36 (01) : 62 - 70
  • [34] Management of vestibular schwannomas with linear accelerator-based stereotactic radiosurgery: a single center experience
    Sager, Omer
    Beyzadeoglu, Murat
    Dincoglan, Ferrat
    Demiral, Selcuk
    Uysal, Bora
    Gamsiz, Hakan
    Oysul, Kaan
    Dirican, Bahar
    Sirin, Salt
    TUMORI JOURNAL, 2013, 99 (05): : 617 - 622
  • [35] Small Vestibular Schwannomas With No Hearing: Comparison of Functional Outcomes in Stereotactic Radiosurgery and Microsurgery
    Coelho, Daniel H.
    Roland, J. Thomas, Jr.
    Rush, Stephen A.
    Narayana, Ashwatha
    Clair, Eric St.
    Chung, Wayne
    Golfinos, John G.
    LARYNGOSCOPE, 2008, 118 (11) : 1909 - 1916
  • [36] Large vestibular schwannomas: long-term outcomes after stereotactic radiosurgery
    Stastna, Daniela
    Urgosik, Dusan
    Chytka, Tomas
    Liscak, Roman
    NEUROENDOCRINOLOGY LETTERS, 2020, 41 (06) : 329 - 338
  • [37] Outcomes Following Malignant Degeneration of Benign Vestibular Schwannomas After Stereotactic Radiosurgery
    Zhang, Michael
    Chang, Steven D.
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2014, 82 (3-4) : 346 - 349
  • [38] Stereotactic radiosurgery as the primary management for patients with Koos grade IV vestibular schwannomas
    Ogino, Akiyoshi
    Lunsford, L. Dade
    Long, Hao
    Johnson, Stephen
    Faramand, Andrew
    Niranjan, Ajay
    Flickinger, John C.
    Kano, Hideyuki
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY, 2021, 135 (04) : 1058 - 1066
  • [39] Stereotactic Radiosurgery in Primary Treatment of Sporadic Small to Medium (<3 cm) Vestibular Schwannomas: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Bonin, Bryce J.
    Beckman, Scott
    Mahmud, Sultan
    Terrell, Danielle
    Whipple, Stephen Garrett
    Diaz, Ryan
    Bhuiyan, Mohammad Alfrad Nobel
    Kumbhare, Deepak
    Wang, Chiachien Jake
    Guthikonda, Bharat
    Savardekar, Amey R.
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2025, 194
  • [40] Imaging Post Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Vestibular Schwannomas-When Should We Scan?
    Ton, Trung
    Sheldon, Anna
    Tikka, Theofano
    Locke, Richard
    Crowther, John A.
    Kontorinis, Georgios
    OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY, 2021, 42 (02) : E216 - E221