Stereotactic radiosurgery planning of vestibular schwannomas: Is MRI at 3 Tesla geometrically accurate?

被引:11
|
作者
Schmidt, M. A. [1 ]
Wells, E. J. [2 ]
Davison, K. [3 ]
Riddell, A. M. [3 ]
Welsh, L. [4 ]
Saran, F. [4 ]
机构
[1] Royal Marsden NHS Fdn Trust, CR UK & EPSRC Canc Imaging Ctr, Inst Canc Res, Sutton, Surrey, England
[2] Royal Marsden NHS Fdn Trust, Med Phys, London, England
[3] Royal Marsden NHS Fdn Trust, Dept Radiol, London, England
[4] Royal Marsden NHS Fdn Trust, Neurooncol Unit, London, England
关键词
distortion; MRI; Stereotactic Radiosurgery; COMPLETE DISTORTION CORRECTION; ACOUSTIC NEUROMAS; T MRI; RADIOTHERAPY; IMAGES; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.1002/mp.12068
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: MRI is a mandatory requirement to accurately plan Stereotactic Radiosurgery (SRS) for Vestibular Schwannomas. However, MRI may be distorted due not only to inhomogeneity of the static magnetic field and gradients but also due to susceptibility-induced effects, which are more prominent at higher magnetic fields. We assess geometrical distortions around air spaces and consider MRI protocol requirements for SRS planning at 3 T. Methods: Hardware-related distortion and the effect of incorrect shimming were investigated with structured test objects. The magnetic field was mapped over the head on five volunteers to assess susceptibility-related distortion in the naso-oro-pharyngeal cavities (NOPC) and around the internal ear canal (IAC). Results: Hardware-related geometric displacements were found to be less than 0.45 mm within the head volume, after distortion correction. Shimming errors can lead to displacements of up to 4 mm, but errors of this magnitude are unlikely to arise in practice. Susceptibility-related field inhomogeneity was under 3.4 ppm, 2.8 ppm, and 2.7 ppm for the head, NOPC region and IAC region, respectively. For the SRS planning protocol (890 Hz/pixel, approximately 1 mm(3) isotropic), susceptibility-related displacements were less than 0.5 mm (head), and 0.4 mm (IAC and NOPC). Large displacements are possible in MRI examinations undertaken with lower receiver bandwidth values, commonly used in clinical MRI. Higher receiver bandwidth makes the protocol less vulnerable to sub-optimal shimming. The shimming volume and the CT-MR co-registration must be considered jointly. Conclusion: Geometric displacements can be kept under 1 mm in the vicinity of air spaces within the head at 3 T with appropriate setting of the receiver bandwidth, correct shimming and employing distortion correction. (C) 2017 The Authors. Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine.
引用
收藏
页码:375 / 381
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Audiological Outcomes in Growing Vestibular Schwannomas Managed Either Conservatively, or With Stereotactic Radiosurgery
    Milner, Thomas Daniel
    Locke, Richard R.
    Kontorinis, Georgios
    Crowther, John A.
    OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY, 2018, 39 (02) : e143 - e150
  • [22] Fractionated stereotactic radiosurgery for vestibular schwannomas using cyberknife: A single institution experience
    Kocak, Mihriban Erdogan
    Sengul, Adem
    Ekici, Kemal
    Olmezoglu, Ali
    Seseogullari, Ozgur
    JOURNAL OF THE PAKISTAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2016, 66 (09) : 1089 - 1093
  • [23] Planned Subtotal Resection following Stereotactic Radiosurgery of Koos 3 and 4 Vestibular Schwannomas
    Turek, Grzegorz
    Dzierzecki, Sebastian
    Obierzynski, Pawel
    Drozdz, Adrian
    Mariak, Zenon
    Zielinska-Turek, Justyna
    Czyzewski, Wojciech
    Dzaman, Karolina
    Zabek, Miroslaw
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2024, 13 (14)
  • [24] Single institution experience treating 104 vestibular schwannomas with fractionated stereotactic radiation therapy or stereotactic radiosurgery
    Bethany M. Anderson
    Deepak Khuntia
    Søren M. Bentzen
    Heather M. Geye
    Lori L. Hayes
    John S. Kuo
    Mustafa K. Baskaya
    Behnam Badie
    Amar Basavatia
    G. Mark Pyle
    Wolfgang A. Tomé
    Minesh P. Mehta
    Journal of Neuro-Oncology, 2014, 116 : 187 - 193
  • [25] Single institution experience treating 104 vestibular schwannomas with fractionated stereotactic radiation therapy or stereotactic radiosurgery
    Anderson, Bethany M.
    Khuntia, Deepak
    Bentzen, Soren M.
    Geye, Heather M.
    Hayes, Lori L.
    Kuo, John S.
    Baskaya, Mustafa K.
    Badie, Behnam
    Basavatia, Amar
    Pyle, G. Mark
    Tome, Wolfgang A.
    Mehta, Minesh P.
    JOURNAL OF NEURO-ONCOLOGY, 2014, 116 (01) : 187 - 193
  • [26] Repeat stereotactic radiosurgery for progressive vestibular schwannomas after primary gamma knife radiosurgery
    Taori, Suchet
    Bin-Alamer, Othman
    Tang, Anthony
    Niranjan, Ajay
    Flickinger, John C.
    Hadjipanayis, Constantinos G.
    Lunsford, L. Dade
    JOURNAL OF NEURO-ONCOLOGY, 2024, 169 (03) : 591 - 599
  • [27] Stereotactic radiosurgery as the first-line treatment for intracanalicular vestibular schwannomas
    Ogino, Akiyoshi
    Lunsford, L. Dade
    Long, Hao
    Johnson, Stephen
    Faramand, Andrew
    Niranjan, Ajay
    Flickinger, John C.
    Kano, Hideyuki
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY, 2021, 135 (04) : 1051 - 1057
  • [28] Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Vestibular Schwannomas: A Survey of Current Practice Patterns of Neurotologists
    German, Michael A.
    Zardouz, Shawn
    Sina, Mehdi K.
    Ziai, Kasra
    Djalilian, Hamid Reza
    OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY, 2011, 32 (05) : 834 - 837
  • [29] Predictors of Hydrocephalus Risk After Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Vestibular Schwannomas: Utility of the Evans Index
    Santhumayor, Brandon A.
    Mashiach, Elad
    Meng, Ying
    Rotman, Lauren
    Golub, Danielle
    Bernstein, Kenneth
    Vasconcellos, Fernando De Nigris
    Silverman, Joshua S.
    Harter, David H.
    Golfinos, John G.
    Kondziolka, Douglas
    NEUROSURGERY, 2025, 96 (03) : 650 - 659
  • [30] Outcomes of stereotactic radiosurgery for large vestibular schwannomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Tosi, Umberto
    Lavieri, Miguel E. Tusa
    An, Anjile
    Maayan, Omri
    Guadix, Sergio W.
    DeRosa, Antonio P.
    Christos, Paul J.
    Pannullo, Susan
    Stieg, Philip E.
    Brandmaier, Andrew
    Knisely, Jonathan P. S.
    Ramakrishna, Rohan
    NEURO-ONCOLOGY PRACTICE, 2021, 8 (04) : 405 - 416