Noninvasive population genetics:: a review of sample source, diet, fragment length and microsatellite motif effects on amplification success and genotyping error rates

被引:197
作者
Broquet, Thomas [1 ]
Menard, Nelly
Petit, Eric
机构
[1] Univ Lausanne, Dept Ecol & Evolut, CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland
[2] Univ Rennes 1, CNRS, UMR 6552, Biol Stn, F-35380 Paimpont, France
关键词
allelic dropout; amplification success; genotyping errors; low DNA; noninvasive;
D O I
10.1007/s10592-006-9146-5
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Noninvasive population genetics has found many applications in ecology and conservation biology. However, the technical difficulties inherent to the analysis of low quantities of DNA generally tend to limit the efficiency of this approach. The nature of samples and loci used in noninvasive population genetics are important factors that may help increasing the potential success of case studies. Here we reviewed the effects of the source of DNA (hair vs. faeces), the diet of focal species, the length of mitochondrial DNA fragments, and the length and repeat motif of nuclear microsatellite loci on genotyping success (amplification success and rate of allelic dropout). Locus-specific effects appeared to have the greatest impact, amplification success decreasing with both mitochondrial and microsatellite fragments' length, while error rates increase with amplicons' length. Dinucleotides showed best amplification success and lower error rates compared to longer repeat units. Genotyping success did not differ between hair- versus faeces-extracted DNA, and success in faeces-based analyses was not consistently influenced by the diet of focal species. While the great remaining variability among studies implies that other unidentified parameters are acting, results show that the careful choice of genetic markers may allow optimizing the success of noninvasive approaches.
引用
收藏
页码:249 / 260
页数:12
相关论文
共 62 条
  • [1] Using faecal DNA sampling and GIS to monitor hybridization between red wolves (Canis rufus) and coyotes (Canis latrans)
    Adams, JR
    Kelly, BT
    Waits, LP
    [J]. MOLECULAR ECOLOGY, 2003, 12 (08) : 2175 - 2186
  • [2] Pooling hair samples to increase DNA yield for PCR
    Alpers, DL
    Taylor, AC
    Sunnucks, P
    Bellman, SA
    Sherwin, WB
    [J]. CONSERVATION GENETICS, 2003, 4 (06) : 779 - 788
  • [3] Testing the reliability of microsatellite typing from faecal DNA in the savannah baboon
    Bayes M.K.
    Smith K.L.
    Alberts S.C.
    Altmann J.
    Bruford M.W.
    [J]. Conservation Genetics, 2000, 1 (2) : 173 - 176
  • [4] False alleles derived from microbial DNA pose a potential source of error in microsatellite genotyping of DNA from faeces
    Bradley, BJ
    Vigilant, L
    [J]. MOLECULAR ECOLOGY NOTES, 2002, 2 (04): : 602 - 605
  • [5] Identification and redesign of human microsatellite markers for genotyping wild chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes verus) and gorilla (Gorilla gorilla gorilla) DNA from faeces
    Bradley B.J.
    Boesch C.
    Vigilant L.
    [J]. Conservation Genetics, 2000, 1 (3) : 289 - 292
  • [6] Quantifying genotyping errors in noninvasive population genetics
    Broquet, T
    Petit, E
    [J]. MOLECULAR ECOLOGY, 2004, 13 (11) : 3601 - 3608
  • [7] Locus effects and sources of error in noninvasive genotyping
    Buchan, JC
    Archie, EA
    Van Horn, RC
    Moss, CJ
    Alberts, SC
    [J]. MOLECULAR ECOLOGY NOTES, 2005, 5 (03): : 680 - 683
  • [8] Noninvasive paternity assignment in Gombe chimpanzees
    Constable, JL
    Ashley, MV
    Goodall, J
    Pusey, AE
    [J]. MOLECULAR ECOLOGY, 2001, 10 (05) : 1279 - 1300
  • [9] Crawley M.J., 2005, STAT COMPUTING INTRO
  • [10] Reliable noninvasive genotyping: Fantasy or reality?
    Fernando, P
    Vidya, TNC
    Rajapakse, C
    Dangolla, A
    Melnick, DJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HEREDITY, 2003, 94 (02) : 115 - 123