Health information diffusion on Twitter: The content and design of WHO tweets matter

被引:18
作者
Hoenings, Holger [1 ]
Knapp, Daniel [1 ]
Nguyen, Bich Chau [1 ]
Richter, Daniel [1 ]
Williams, Kelly [1 ]
Dorsch, Isabelle [1 ]
Fietkiewicz, Kaja J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Heinrich Heine Univ Dusseldorf, Dept Informat Sci, Dusseldorf, Germany
关键词
global health; public health; research qualitative; research quantitative; social media; statistics;
D O I
10.1111/hir.12361
中图分类号
G25 [图书馆学、图书馆事业]; G35 [情报学、情报工作];
学科分类号
1205 ; 120501 ;
摘要
Background Micro-blogging services empower health institutions to quickly disseminate health information to many users. By analysing user data, infodemiology (i.e. improving public health using user contributed health related content) can be measured in terms of information diffusion. Objectives Tweets by the WHO were examined in order to identify tweet attributes that lead to a high information diffusion rate using Twitter data collected between November 2019 and January 2020. Methods One thousand hundred and seventy-seven tweets were collected using Python's Tweepy library. Afterwards, k-means clustering and manual coding were used to classify tweets by theme, sentiment, length and count of emojis, pictures, videos and links. Resulting groups with different characteristics were analysed for significant differences using Mann-Whitney U- and Kruskal-Wallis H-tests. Results The topic of the tweet, the included links, emojis and (one) picture as well as the tweet length significantly affected the tweets' diffusion, whereas sentiment and videos did not show any significant influence on the diffusion of tweets. Discussion The findings of this study give insights on why specific health topics might generate less attention and do not showcase sufficient information diffusion. Conclusion The subject and appearance of a tweet influence its diffusion, making the design equally essential to the preparation of its content.
引用
收藏
页码:22 / 35
页数:14
相关论文
共 59 条
[1]  
Abdullah NorAthiyah., 2015, J. Inf. Process., V23, P31, DOI DOI 10.2197/IPSJJIP.23.31
[2]   Cluster Analysis of Twitter Data: A Review of Algorithms [J].
Alnajran, Noufa ;
Crockett, Keeley ;
McLean, David ;
Latham, Annabel .
ICAART: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 9TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON AGENTS AND ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, VOL 2, 2017, :239-249
[3]   Identifying diffusion patterns of research articles on Twitter: A case study of online engagement with open access articles [J].
Alperin, Juan Pablo ;
Gomez, Charles J. ;
Haustein, Stefanie .
PUBLIC UNDERSTANDING OF SCIENCE, 2019, 28 (01) :2-18
[4]  
Antenucci Dolan., 2011, Final Project, V545, P1
[5]  
Bird S., 2009, NATURAL LANGUAGE PRO
[6]   Vaccine Images on Twitter: Analysis of What Images are Shared [J].
Chen, Tao ;
Dredze, Mark .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2018, 20 (04)
[7]   Diffusion of Messages from an Electronic Cigarette Brand to Potential Users through Twitter [J].
Chu, Kar-Hai ;
Unger, Jennifer B. ;
Allem, Jon-Patrick ;
Pattarroyo, Monica ;
Soto, Daniel ;
Cruz, Tess Boley ;
Yang, Haodong ;
Jiang, Ling ;
Yang, Christopher C. .
PLOS ONE, 2015, 10 (12)
[8]  
Dave A., 2018, START FREAKING OUT A
[9]   The spreading of misinformation online [J].
Del Vicario, Michela ;
Bessi, Alessandro ;
Zollo, Fabiana ;
Petroni, Fabio ;
Scala, Antonio ;
Caldarelli, Guido ;
Stanley, H. Eugene ;
Quattrociocchi, Walter .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2016, 113 (03) :554-559
[10]  
Einspanner J., 2014, Twitter and Society, P97