What role for frames in scalar conflicts?

被引:14
作者
Juerges, Nataly [1 ]
Newig, Jens [1 ]
机构
[1] Leuphana Univ Luneburg, Inst Environm & Sustainabil Commun, D-21335 Luneburg, Germany
关键词
Conflict; Framing; Multi-level governance; Scale; Wind energy; Sustainability transition; FOREST CONFLICTS; MANAGEMENT; STATE; PERCEPTIONS; MISMATCHES; GOVERNANCE; FARM;
D O I
10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.08.013
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
To meet growing demands of renewable energy, wind farms are increasingly planned and situated in forested lands. This stirs novel conflicts, which are often not strictly technological in nature. Instead, perceptions and narratives of affected actors play an important role in the development of such conflicts. As often in land-use decision, this involves conflicts over the right spatial scale on which decisions should be taken. This study empirically examines how conflicts over the most appropriate governance scale for decision-making are rooted in the different frames of involved actors. Based on 44 qualitative interviews in the German states of Lower Saxony and Rhineland-Palatinate, this study provides evidence for the value of frame theory for understanding scaling conflicts. Furthermore, the study is helpful to wind energy policy makers because it illustrates how actors perceive the strength and weaknesses of decision-making at different governance scales. The findings imply that frame reflection should become more integrated into conflict management practices because conflict over the most appropriate governance scale can be based on different perceptions of what the conflict is about and which scales of action are required. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:426 / 434
页数:9
相关论文
共 40 条
  • [1] Framing the environment - Disputes and developments in the management of Norwegian salmon fjords
    Aasetre, Jorund
    Vik, Jostein
    [J]. OCEAN & COASTAL MANAGEMENT, 2013, 71 : 203 - 212
  • [2] Baumgartner F. R., 1993, AGENDAS INSTABILITY
  • [3] The Scaling of Water Governance Tasks: A Comparative Federal Analysis of the European Union and Australia
    Benson, David
    Jordan, Andrew
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2010, 46 (01) : 7 - 16
  • [4] Making sense of intractable multiparty conflict: A study of framing in four environmental disputes
    Brummans, Boris H. J. M.
    Putnam, Linda L.
    Gray, Barbara
    Hanke, Ralph
    Lewicki, Roy J.
    Wiethoff, Carolyn
    [J]. COMMUNICATION MONOGRAPHS, 2008, 75 (01) : 25 - 51
  • [5] Beyond environmental frames: The social representation and cultural resonance of nature in conflicts over a Dutch woodland
    Buijs, Arjen E.
    Arts, Bas J. M.
    Elands, Birgit H. M.
    Lengkeek, Jaap
    [J]. GEOFORUM, 2011, 42 (03) : 329 - 341
  • [6] Linking global and local scales: designing dynamic assessment and management processes
    Cash, DW
    Moser, SC
    [J]. GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS, 2000, 10 (02): : 109 - 120
  • [7] Wind power, landscape and strategic, spatial planning-The construction of 'acceptable locations' in Wales
    Cowell, Richard
    [J]. LAND USE POLICY, 2010, 27 (02) : 222 - 232
  • [8] Cumming GS, 2006, ECOL SOC, V11
  • [9] Davis C.B., 2003, Environmental Practice, V5, P200, DOI [10.1017/s1466046603035580, DOI 10.1017/S1466046603035580, 10.1017/S1466046603035580]
  • [10] The political construction of scale
    Delaney, D
    Leitner, H
    [J]. POLITICAL GEOGRAPHY, 1997, 16 (02) : 93 - 97