Comparative study on optimizing the wind farm layout using different design methods and cost models

被引:32
作者
Wang, Longyan [1 ]
Tan, Andy C. C. [1 ]
Gu, Yuantong [1 ]
机构
[1] Queensland Univ Technol, Sch Chem Phys & Mech Engn, Brisbane, Qld 4001, Australia
关键词
Layout optimization; Comparative study; Grid density; Grid based method; Unrestricted coordinate method; Mosetti's cost model; Chen's cost model; PARTICLE SWARM OPTIMIZATION; TURBINES; PLACEMENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.jweia.2015.07.009
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Optimizing wind farm layout is an effective tool to decrease wind power losses caused by the wake interaction between wind turbines. Current researches focus on advancing the optimization algorithms and improving the wind farm models based on two design methods (the grid based method and the unrestricted coordinate method). However, it has been rarely reported for the comparative studies of these two methods. Meanwhile, the topic of how to select a better wind farm cost model for the layout optimization has not been studied in literatures, while it is extremely important to the real wind farm design since the real wind farm cost can be highly uncertain which cannot be represented by a fixed model for different wind farms. Therefore, the wind farm layout optimization using the two design methods is conducted in this paper. Three different grid situations are considered so that the best optimization results with the grid based method can be obtained to compare with the unrestricted coordinate method more convincingly. Two widely acceptable cost models (Mosetti's model and Chen's model) are employed to unveil their influence on the optimization results. It has been found that (i) 20 x 20 grids should be preferred for the grid based method instead of the previously widely applied 10 x 10 grids; (ii) compared to using the grid based method, there is a small improvement for the optimization result using the unrestricted coordinate method. Nevertheless, more computation cost is needed for the method when a large number of turbines are optimized and (iii) there is a big discrepancy between the optimization with different cost models. Mosetti's cost model is more accurate than Chen's cost model when the optimized number of turbines is large and vise versa. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 10
页数:10
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]  
Beyer H.G., 1996, P EUR UN WIND EN C G
[2]  
Bilbao M., 2010, P 16 C ARG CIENC COM
[3]   A system-level cost-of-energy wind farm layout optimization with landowner modeling [J].
Chen, Le ;
MacDonald, Erin .
ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2014, 77 :484-494
[4]  
Chen Y, 2013, COMMERCIAL WIND FARM, P47
[5]  
Chowdhury S., 2010, P ASME 2010 INT DES
[6]   ON THE WIND-SPEED REDUCTION IN THE CENTER OF LARGE CLUSTERS OF WIND TURBINES [J].
FRANDSEN, S .
JOURNAL OF WIND ENGINEERING AND INDUSTRIAL AERODYNAMICS, 1992, 39 (1-3) :251-265
[7]  
Goldberg M., 2009, Jobs and Economic Development Impact (JEDI) Model
[8]  
Goldberg M., 2004, P GLOB WINDPOWER C
[9]   Placement of wind turbines using genetic algorithms [J].
Grady, SA ;
Hussaini, MY ;
Abdullah, MM .
RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2005, 30 (02) :259-270
[10]  
isbot S., 2010, WIND ENERGY, V13, P297