Treatment of cannabis dependence using escitalopram in combination with cognitive-behavior therapy: a double-blind placebo-controlled study

被引:35
作者
Weinstein, A. M. [1 ,2 ]
Miller, H. [1 ]
Bluvstein, I. [1 ]
Rapoport, E. [1 ]
Schreiber, S. [1 ,4 ]
Bar-Hamburger, R. [3 ]
Bloch, M. [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Tel Aviv Sourasky Med Ctr, Dept Psychiat, IL-64239 Tel Aviv, Israel
[2] Tel Aviv Sourasky Med Ctr, Dept Nucl Med, IL-64239 Tel Aviv, Israel
[3] Israeli Anti Drug Author, Jerusalem, Israel
[4] Tel Aviv Univ, Sackler Fac Med, IL-69978 Tel Aviv, Israel
关键词
Anxiety; cannabis dependence; cognitive-behavior therapy; depression; escitalopram; withdrawal syndrome; MARIJUANA WITHDRAWAL; LABORATORY MODEL; BUPROPION-SR; DEPRESSION; TRIAL; PHARMACOTHERAPY; ADOLESCENTS; FLUOXETINE; NEFAZODONE; RELAPSE;
D O I
10.3109/00952990.2013.819362
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Background: Cannabis is the most frequently used illegal substance in the United States and Europe. There is a dramatic increase in the demand for treatment for cannabis dependence. Cannabis users frequently have co-morbid mood symptoms, especially depression and anxiety, and regular cannabis users may self-medicate for such symptoms. Objectives: We report a double-blind, placebo-controlled treatment study, for the prevention of cannabis use in cannabis-dependent individuals. Method: Regular cannabis-dependent users (n = 52) were treated for 9 weeks with weekly cognitive-behavior and motivation-enhancement therapy sessions together with escitalopram 10 mg/day. Urine samples were collected to monitor delta-9 tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) during treatment and questionnaires were administered to assess anxiety and depression. Results: We observed a high rate of dropout (50%) during the 9-week treatment program. Fifty-two patients were included in the intention-to-treat analysis. Of these, ten (19%) remained abstinent after 9 weeks of treatment as indicated by negative urine samples for THC. Escitalopram provided no advantage over placebo in either abstinence rates from cannabis or anxiety and depression scores during the withdrawal and abstinent periods. Conclusions: Escitalopram treatment does not provide an additional benefit either for achieving abstinence, or for the treatment of the cannabis withdrawal syndrome. Due to limitations of our study, namely, a high dropout rate and effects of low abstinence rates on measures of anxiety, depression and withdrawal, it is premature to conclude that selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors are not effective for treatment of the cannabis withdrawal syndrome.
引用
收藏
页码:16 / 22
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], ART NEWS
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2012, EUR MON CTR DRUGS DR
[3]   Testing the self-medication hypothesis of depression and aggression in cannabis-dependent subjects [J].
Arendt, Mikkel ;
Rosenberg, Raben ;
Fjordback, Lone ;
Brandholdt, Jack ;
Foldager, Leslie ;
Sher, Leo ;
Munk-Jorgensen, Povl .
PSYCHOLOGICAL MEDICINE, 2007, 37 (07) :935-945
[4]  
Beck A.T., 1978, DEPRESSION INVENTORY
[5]  
Budney A. J., 2002, Drug and Alcohol Dependence, V66, pS23
[6]   The cannabis withdrawal syndrome [J].
Budney, AJ ;
Hughes, JR .
CURRENT OPINION IN PSYCHIATRY, 2006, 19 (03) :233-238
[7]   Marijuana abstinence effects in marijuana smokers maintained in their home environment [J].
Budney, AJ ;
Hughes, JR ;
Moore, BA ;
Novy, PL .
ARCHIVES OF GENERAL PSYCHIATRY, 2001, 58 (10) :917-924
[8]   Review of the validity and significance of cannabis withdrawal syndrome [J].
Budney, AJ ;
Hughes, JR ;
Moore, BA ;
Vandrey, R .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2004, 161 (11) :1967-1977
[9]   Adding voucher-based incentives to coping skills and motivational enhancement improves outcomes during treatment for marijuana dependence [J].
Budney, AJ ;
Higgins, ST ;
Radonovich, KJ ;
Novy, PL .
JOURNAL OF CONSULTING AND CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2000, 68 (06) :1051-1061
[10]   Adults seeking treatment for marijuana dependence: A comparison with cocaine-dependent treatment seekers [J].
Budney, AJ ;
Radonovich, KJ ;
Higgins, ST ;
Wong, CJ .
EXPERIMENTAL AND CLINICAL PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 1998, 6 (04) :419-426