Risk analysis of geothermal power plants using Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA) technique

被引:80
|
作者
Feili, Hamid Reza [1 ]
Akar, Navid [2 ]
Lotfizadeh, Hossein [3 ]
Bairampour, Mohammad [2 ]
Nasiri, Sina [4 ]
机构
[1] Alzahra Univ, Fac Engn, Dept Ind Engn, Tehran, Iran
[2] Karaj Islamic Azad Univ, Young Researchers Club, Karaj, Iran
[3] Karaj Islamic Azad Univ, Fac Engn, Dept Mech Engn, Karaj, Iran
[4] Karaj Islamic Azad Univ, Fac Engn, Dept Ind Engn, Karaj, Iran
关键词
Renewable energy; Geothermal energy; Geothermal Power Plants (GPPs); Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA); RANKINE-CYCLE; ENERGY; SYSTEM; GENERATION; STEAM; HEAT;
D O I
10.1016/j.enconman.2012.10.027
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
Renewable energy plays a key role in the transition toward a low carbon economy and the provision of a secure supply of energy. Geothermal energy is a versatile source as a form of renewable energy that meets popular demand. Since some Geothermal Power Plants (GPPs) face various failures, the requirement of a technique for team engineering to eliminate or decrease potential failures is considerable. Because no specific published record of considering an FMEA applied to GPPs with common failure modes have been found already, in this paper, the utilization of Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA) as a convenient technique for determining, classifying and analyzing common failures in typical GPPs is considered. As a result, an appropriate risk scoring of occurrence, detection and severity of failure modes and computing the Risk Priority Number (RPN) for detecting high potential failures is achieved. In order to expedite accuracy and ability to analyze the process, XFMEA software is utilized. Moreover, 5 major parts of a GPP is studied to propose a suitable approach for developing GPPs and increasing reliability by recommending corrective actions for each failure mode. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:69 / 76
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Radiation Oncology Ransomware Attack Response Risk Analysis Using Failure Modes and Effects Analysis
    Vinogradskiy, Yevgeniy
    Schubert, Leah
    Taylor, Amy
    Rudoler, Shari
    Lamb, James
    PRACTICAL RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2024, 14 (05) : e407 - e415
  • [32] Cable failure modes and effects risk analysis perspectives
    Nowlen, SP
    PROBABILISTIC SAFETY ASSESSMENT AND MANAGEMENT, VOL 1- 6, 2004, : 2481 - 2486
  • [33] Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA) on Xoft®
    Palaniswaamy, G.
    Richardson, S.
    Rangaraj, D.
    Mutic, S.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2010, 37 (06)
  • [34] FAILURE MODE AND EFFECTS ANALYSIS (FMEA) IMPLEMENTATION
    Rojas Lema, Sandra
    3C TECNOLOGIA, 2019, 8 (01): : 64 - 74
  • [35] Using fuzzy logic to reduce risk uncertainty in failure modes and effects analysis
    de Aguiar, Jessica
    Scalice, Regis Kovacs
    Bond, Danielle
    JOURNAL OF THE BRAZILIAN SOCIETY OF MECHANICAL SCIENCES AND ENGINEERING, 2018, 40 (11)
  • [36] Using fuzzy logic to reduce risk uncertainty in failure modes and effects analysis
    Jéssica de Aguiar
    Regis Kovacs Scalice
    Danielle Bond
    Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering, 2018, 40
  • [37] Evaluating risk to the environment from mining using failure modes and effects analysis
    Dushnisky, K
    Vick, SG
    UNCERTAINTY IN THE GEOLOGIC ENVIRONMENT: FROM THEORY TO PRACTICE, VOLS 1 AND 2: PROCEEDINGS OF UNCERTAINTY '96, 1996, (58): : 848 - 865
  • [38] Structural and Functional Analysis in Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA)
    Panyukov D.I.
    Kozlovskii V.N.
    Aidarov D.V.
    Shakurskii M.V.
    Russian Engineering Research, 2023, 43 (08) : 1018 - 1022
  • [39] Thermodynamics and exergoeconomic analysis of geothermal power plants
    Yildirim, Deniz
    Ozgener, Leyla
    RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2012, 16 (08): : 6438 - 6454
  • [40] Failure Analysis of FMEA
    Bluvband, Zigmund
    Grabov, Pavel
    ANNUAL RELIABILITY AND MAINTAINABILITY SYMPOSIUM, 2009 PROCEEDINGS, 2009, : 345 - 348