Measuring Writing Development and Proficiency Gains Using Indices of Lexical and Syntactic Complexity: Evidence From Longitudinal Russian Learner Corpus Data

被引:9
作者
Kisselev, Olesya [1 ]
Soyan, Rossina [2 ]
Pastushenkov, Dmitrii [3 ]
Merrill, Jason [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas San Antonio, Dept Bilingual & Bicultural Studies, 3 302D Main Bldg,One UTSA Circle, San Antonio, TX 78249 USA
[2] Carnegie Mellon Univ, Dept Modern Language, 5000 Forbes Ave, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
[3] Harvard Univ, Barker Ctr, Dept Slav Languages & Literatures, 12 Quincy St, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
[4] Michigan State Univ, Dept Linguist Languages & Cultures, 619 Red Cedar Rd, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA
关键词
L2 writing development; L2; proficiency; lexical complexity; syntactic complexity; Russian; EXPLORING MULTIPLE PROFILES; L2; LANGUAGE; QUALITY; DIVERSITY; JUDGMENTS; ENGLISH; WRITERS;
D O I
10.1111/modl.12808
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Linguistic complexity serves as an important measure of second language (L2) writing development. Complexity indices, however, rarely feature in the studies of learner languages other than English. Additionally, L2 writing studies have been criticized for the lack of consistency in defining proficiency. The current study addresses these gaps by exploring writing development in a less commonly studied language (i.e., Russian) while paying attention to the operationalization of proficiency. We analyzed lexical and syntactic complexity indices in a corpus of essays written by learners at different levels at the beginning and the end of an instructional program. Our analyses demonstrate that 9 complexity indices (i.e., mean word length, type-token ratio, percentage of high-frequency words, mean sentence length, clauses per sentence, syntactic depth, proportion of subordinate clauses, and proportion of relative clauses) changed significantly over the course of the program; the same 9 indices showed significant correlation with the initial curricular placement, and all-with the exception of clauses per sentence-modestly or highly correlated with the final rating on the proficiency test. The findings confirm the usefulness of complexity measures in tracking writing development in L2 Russian.
引用
收藏
页码:798 / 817
页数:20
相关论文
共 60 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2021, UDPipe 1 Models
[2]  
Bailyn JohnFrederick., 2012, The syntax of Russian
[3]   A 2ND LOOK AT T-UNIT ANALYSIS - RECONSIDERING THE SENTENCE [J].
BARDOVIHARLIG, K .
TESOL QUARTERLY, 1992, 26 (02) :390-395
[4]   "Follow Your Interests Because Those Will Motivate You to Excel": An Interview with Alister Cumming [J].
Barkaoui, Khaled ;
Shi, Ling ;
Riazi, Mehdi .
LANGUAGE ASSESSMENT QUARTERLY, 2021, 18 (01) :56-75
[5]  
Barykina Alevtina N., 1978, Posobie po razvitiiu navykov pis'mennoi rechi
[6]  
BIBER D, 2016, APPL LINGUIST, V37, P639, DOI DOI 10.1093/APPLIN/AMU059
[7]   Should We Use Characteristics of Conversation to Measure Grammatical Complexity in L2 Writing Development? [J].
Biber, Douglas ;
Gray, Bethany ;
Poonpon, Kornwipa .
TESOL QUARTERLY, 2011, 45 (01) :5-35
[8]  
Boguslavsky I., 2011, P INT C DEPENDENCY L, P318
[9]  
Bulte B., 2012, Dimensions of L2 performance and proficiency: Complexity, accuracy and fluency in SLA, P21, DOI DOI 10.1075/LLLT.32.02BUL
[10]   Conceptualizing and measuring short-term changes in L2 writing complexity [J].
Bulte, Bram ;
Housen, Alex .
JOURNAL OF SECOND LANGUAGE WRITING, 2014, 26 :42-65