Practices and Complications of Vascular Closure Devices and Manual Compression in Patients Undergoing Elective Transfemoral Coronary Procedures

被引:61
作者
Smilowitz, Nathaniel R. [1 ]
Kirtane, Ajay J. [1 ]
Guiry, Michael [1 ]
Gray, William A. [1 ]
Dolcimascolo, Pilar [1 ]
Querijero, Michael [1 ]
Echeverry, Claudia [1 ]
Kalcheva, Nellie [1 ]
Flores, Braulio [1 ]
Singh, Varinder P. [1 ]
Rabbani, LeRoy [1 ]
Kodali, Susheel [1 ]
Collins, Michael B. [1 ]
Leon, Martin B. [1 ]
Moses, Jeffrey W. [1 ]
Weisz, Giora [1 ]
机构
[1] Columbia Univ, Med Ctr, New York Presbyterian Hosp, Ctr Intervent Vasc Therapy, New York, NY 10027 USA
关键词
DIAGNOSTIC CARDIAC-CATHETERIZATION; FEMORAL-ARTERY; ACCESS SITE; INTERVENTION; RISK; METAANALYSIS; ANGIOPLASTY; ANGIOGRAPHY; TRIAL; TRANSFUSION;
D O I
10.1016/j.amjcard.2012.02.065
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Femoral arterial puncture is the most common access method for coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs). Access complications, although infrequent, affect morbidity, mortality, costs, and length of hospital stay. Vascular closure devices (VCDs) are used for rapid hemostasis and early ambulation, but there is no consensus on whether VCDs are superior to manual compression (MC). A retrospective review and nested case-control study of consecutive patients undergoing elective transfemoral coronary angiography and PCI over 3 years was performed. Hemostasis strategy was performed according to the operators' discretion. Vascular complications were defined as groin bleeding (hematoma, hemoglobin decrease >= 3 g/dl, transfusion, retroperitoneal bleeding, or arterial perforation), pseudoaneurysm, arteriovenous fistula formation, obstruction, or infection. Patients with postprocedure femoral vascular access complications were compared to randomly selected patients without complication. Data were available for 9,108 procedures, of which PCI was performed in 3,172 (34.8%). MC was performed in 2,581 (28.3%) and VCDs (4 different types) were deployed in 6,527 procedures (71.7%). Significant complications occurred in 74 procedures (0.81%), with 32 (1.24%) complications with MC and 42 (0.64%) with VCD (p = 0.004). VCD deployment failed in 80 procedures (1.23%), of which 8 (10%) had vascular complications. VCD use was a predictor of fewer complications (odds ratio 0.52, 95% confidence interval 0.33 to 0.83). In the case-control analysis, older age and use of large (7Fr to 8Fr) femoral sheaths were independent predictors of complications. In conclusion, the retrospective analysis of contemporary hemostasis strategies and outcomes in elective coronary procedures identified a low rate of complications (0.81%), with superior results after VCD deployment. Careful selection of hemostasis strategy and closure device may further decrease complication rates. (C) 2012 Published by Elsevier Inc. (Am J Cardiol 2012;110:177-182)
引用
收藏
页码:177 / 182
页数:6
相关论文
共 30 条
  • [1] Significantly Improved Vascular Complications Among Women Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention A Report From the Northern New England Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Registry
    Ahmed, Bina
    Piper, Winthrop D.
    Malenka, David
    VerLee, Peter
    Robb, John
    Ryan, Thomas
    Herne, Michael
    Phillips, William
    Dauerman, Harold L.
    [J]. CIRCULATION-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2009, 2 (05) : 423 - 429
  • [2] Propensity score analysis of vascular complications after diagnostic cardiac catheterization and percutaneous coronary intervention 1998-2003
    Applegate, RJ
    Sacrinty, MT
    Kutcher, MA
    Baki, TT
    Gandhi, SK
    Santos, RM
    Little, WC
    [J]. CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2006, 67 (04) : 556 - 562
  • [3] Applegate RJ, 2010, J INVASIVE CARDIOL, V22, P358
  • [4] Trends in Vascular Complications After Diagnostic Cardiac Catheterization and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Via the Femoral Artery, 1998 to 2007
    Applegate, Robert J.
    Sacrinty, Matthew T.
    Kutcher, Michael A.
    Kahl, Frederic R.
    Gandhi, Sanjay K.
    Santos, Renato M.
    Little, William C.
    [J]. JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2008, 1 (03) : 317 - 326
  • [5] A propensity analysis of the risk of vascular complications after cardiac catheterization procedures with the use of vascular closure devices
    Arora, Nipun
    Matheny, Michael E.
    Sepke, Carrie
    Resnic, Frederic S.
    [J]. AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL, 2007, 153 (04) : 606 - 611
  • [6] Vascular Closure Device Failure: Frequency and Implications A Propensity-Matched Analysis
    Bangalore, Sripal
    Arora, Nipun
    Resnic, Frederic S.
    [J]. CIRCULATION-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2009, 2 (06) : 549 - 556
  • [7] Meta-analysis of randomized trials on the efficacy of vascular closure devices after diagnostic angiography and angioplasty
    Biancari, Fausto
    D'Andrea, Vito
    Di Marco, Carlo
    Savino, Grazia
    Tiozzo, Valentina
    Catania, Antonio
    [J]. AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL, 2010, 159 (04) : 518 - 531
  • [8] Brueck M, 2010, J INVASIVE CARDIOL, V22, P353
  • [9] Association of the arterial access site at angioplasty with transfusion and mortality: the MORTAL study (Mortality benefit Of Reduced Transfusion after percutaneous coronary intervention via the Arm or Leg)
    Chase, A. J.
    Fretz, E. B.
    Warburton, W. P.
    Klinke, W. P.
    Carere, R. G.
    Pi, D.
    Berry, B.
    Hilton, J. D.
    [J]. HEART, 2008, 94 (08) : 1019 - 1025
  • [10] Safety of femoral closure devices after percutaneous coronary interventions in the era of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa platelet blockade
    Cura, FA
    Kapadia, SR
    L'Allier, PL
    Schneider, JP
    Kreindel, MS
    Silver, MJ
    Yadav, JS
    Simpfendorfer, CC
    Raymond, RR
    Tuzcu, EM
    Franco, I
    Whitlow, PL
    Topol, EJ
    Ellis, SG
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2000, 86 (07) : 780 - +